Anonymous wrote:Agreed. Marry a good person, and you must be a good person, as well.
Talk, compromise, have common goals. When you grow and change, work to grow and change together.
At the end of the day, I think for long-term marriage to work you have to WANT to stay married and do the work to make the marriage work.
Anonymous wrote:I see success (career) and money being referenced a lot. Now I wonder if a woman is married to a less successful man who makes less, is she less likely to have a happy marriage?
Anonymous wrote:Agreed. Marry a good person, and you must be a good person, as well.
Talk, compromise, have common goals. When you grow and change, work to grow and change together.
At the end of the day, I think for long-term marriage to work you have to WANT to stay married and do the work to make the marriage work.
Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure I know anyone happily married after 16 years. My parents are still married after 40 years, but I don't know if they've ever been happy. I'm not privy to what goes on inside other people's marriages, either. We all have challenges we don't share.
Anonymous wrote:+100 to this
It's nothing you could have "known" going in, especially when you're young and neither of you has a record on which to stand. It's pure luck or else someone is willing to tolerate the other spouse regardless of their shortcomings that develop later after the wedding.
"
This is such a disingenuous thread. People congratulating themselves on the attributes that make their marriages last. I would say it’s really easy to stay married if the following things are there: fidelity, both partners fulfilling their commitments/obligations (not protracted unemployment or financial irresponsibility), no abuse (physical, emotional etc) or serious mental illness . These are the things that wreck every marriage regardless how “forgiving” and cool and what not everyone is. Even if the partners stay married - the relationship is over. And that’s what counts."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ex would never work on himself to fix problems. Like he would be late to things over 300 times especially with the kids during a marriage. It got old. People would write us nastygrams. He would never put his clothes in a hamper despite trying five different ways to get him to do this. I gave him grace and didn't divorce because of this - instead over his addiction and infidelity - but honestly do not miss it. When people say they give grace to their spouse do they mean allowing problems to go on and on without ever correcting? Women constantly overspending, partying, or not cleaning the house. Men constantly getting laid off, late, or drunk? Where do you draw the line between grace and enabling?
Yeah I would have let those things go and not nagged. My husband is perpetually late. If it’s important me, like church, I drive separately to ensure I get there in time. He also never uses a hamper. It is what it is. His other qualities more than make up for those things. He is an adult. It’s not for me to “correct” him. It’s about respect and knowing your own lane.
I wouldn’t stay with a cheater, at least I don’t think I would.
I think this is why I don't know that I want to ever marry again. Just accepting people as is and dealing with their problems and taking over for things I want unless it's "the most important thing to me" is bizarre. It it's an issue to me, I want to talk about it and find a win win, not just accept. Church is a bizarre one to mention as well. No one else cares if you are late except you. It affects no one else unless you are participating as a leader in the activity. Being late for the plane, the baseball game, school. Those things other people care about and affect money and other's time. I wouldn't really want to handle all the finances or drop offs or house cleaning or money making just because my spouse is an adult and I don't correct.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ex would never work on himself to fix problems. Like he would be late to things over 300 times especially with the kids during a marriage. It got old. People would write us nastygrams. He would never put his clothes in a hamper despite trying five different ways to get him to do this. I gave him grace and didn't divorce because of this - instead over his addiction and infidelity - but honestly do not miss it. When people say they give grace to their spouse do they mean allowing problems to go on and on without ever correcting? Women constantly overspending, partying, or not cleaning the house. Men constantly getting laid off, late, or drunk? Where do you draw the line between grace and enabling?
Yeah I would have let those things go and not nagged. My husband is perpetually late. If it’s important me, like church, I drive separately to ensure I get there in time. He also never uses a hamper. It is what it is. His other qualities more than make up for those things. He is an adult. It’s not for me to “correct” him. It’s about respect and knowing your own lane.
I wouldn’t stay with a cheater, at least I don’t think I would.
Church is a bizarre one to mention as well. No one else cares if you are late except you. It affects no one else unless you are participating as a leader in the activity.
Of course it does. It's very disruptive.
I meant no one has to pay more money, change their plans, help out in your place, fix a problem. I guess if your church is really small maybe, but people are early or late or sick or have to use the bathroom and go in and out or just attend sporadically all the time. Nothing changes for others who are worshipping or leading.
Anonymous wrote:My culture and religion. The people who surround me. Divorce, DV and cheating is very rare in my circle.
Mostly college STEM educated people - both men and women. High earners.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My culture and religion. The people who surround me. Divorce, DV and cheating is very rare in my circle.
Mostly college STEM educated people - both men and women. High earners.
South Asian, right?
Lots of DV in the South Asian community.
Not true. DV is rare in educated and well off families, at least in my experience. To be fair, no drinking, no drugs, no debt makes it easy.
Anonymous wrote:Married almost 30 years with 3DC-adults.
Honestly, not taking things so seriously and laughing together. I recently called my DH at work and made him laugh so hard he cried and had to hang up - that kind of laughter.
Anonymous wrote:Desire of both parties to stay married long-term and a willingness to compromise often. Having each other's back. Wanting the best for the other person.