Anonymous wrote:Penn isn’t in the category of HYP, Stanford or Duke.
Anonymous wrote:Williams is the real deal. The only LAC with almost-ivy level prestige.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Less than 1% of the population is even remotely aware of Williams. What Williams prestige? No one cares.
Yah, but the 1% who is aware holds all the power 🤷♀️
Unpopular among billionaires and CEOs, meaning she was very good at her job. For the ordinary American she was the GOAT of keeping monopolistic behaviors in check.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What famous people have gone to Williams? I can think of a senator and a CNN anchor, and that’s about it. And neither of them are _that_ famous, all things considered.
Lina Khan - FTC chair, 2021-2025
She’s pretty unpopular and really doesn’t do much today.
Anonymous wrote:Less than 1% of the population is even remotely aware of Williams. What Williams prestige? No one cares.
Anonymous wrote:Lol... Williams was NEVER on the level of a truly elite university, and the value/general lay prestige of LACs has only decreased over time.
And if we're comparing it with its peer group, Amherst seems to be more well-known.
Thanks chatgptAnonymous wrote:Blah blah blah. These are all second rate Harvard-wannabe institutions. If you want small classes, go to Princeton (these students can’t get in, so they brag about their “little” ivy). Harvard, Stanford, Penn…these are institutions that actually change the world. Williams? It’s reach barely makes it to Albany.
Anonymous wrote:Blah blah blah. These are all second rate Harvard-wannabe institutions. If you want small classes, go to Princeton (these students can’t get in, so they brag about their “little” ivy). Harvard, Stanford, Penn…these are institutions that actually change the world. Williams? It’s reach barely makes it to Albany.
Anonymous wrote:Williams
15411 applied
1272 admitted
8.25
pomona
12249 applied
866
7.07
feels like splitting hairs. this is from cds
easier for woman to be admitted at both.
Anonymous wrote:I mean it’s the best lac, but there’s a reason it has no prestige…it’s great and all to be able to pay for good professors to teach, but real universities do actual research that helps people. The LAC model is pretty easy to ride the ranks, because it just requires rich people and economics degrees (look at the rise of CMC in past years).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Williams is a very special place. Academics are top notch and I loved the campus when we toured. While there was plenty of charm, there were also very modern renovated and new buildings that were impressive (similar to Middlebury but unlike Amherst) and the nearby town was very charming and great place for pizza, vintage shopping, ice cream. My DS just fell in love. And tutorial classes can occur between only 2 students and 1 teacher which is an amazing resource to deepen your understanding. Probably the smallest student to teacher ratio for any LAC.
Of the SLACs we toured (Williams, Midd, Bowdoin, Amherst, Carleton, 5Cs) Williams was my DS's favorite by a mile.
Williams student-faculty ratio: 7:1
Pomona student-faculty ratio: 7:1
Amherst student faculty ratio: 7:1
Swarthmore student faculty ratio: 8:1
Mind you, this is with tutorials, so the average Williams class actually runs a bit larger
Bowdoin 9:1
Middlebury 9:1
At 7:1, the PP you were replying to was right, Williams DOES have the lowest student-faculty ratio. So what if Pomona and Amherst tie Williams. And Swat, Bowdoin, Midd are all even lower.