Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t want strangers raising my children.
They're probably better at it than you.
Why would a random daycare worker be better at taking care of kids than their own parent?
Yes, every parent is a fit to parent by virtue of being a parent. Anyone who is paid to provide childcare could never be as fit. 🙄
Of course this isn’t true. I’m way more qualified to raise my own kids vs some kid making $22/hour. YMMV.
Why are you more qualified?
Because I’m intelligent and extremely vested. I have three kids at top colleges who are kind, loving, empathetic kids so I’m proud of my work and investment in their lives. It worked in my case, again, YMMV.
And your children's memories will be mostly of the nanny raising them, while on her phone all day. Don't fool yourself. A childcare worker will never care for your children in the same way you will (I hope).
And no paid childcare worker is extremely intelligent or educated? I went to Williams for college and Columbia for grad school. My husband went to Harvard. I have three kids who I love and care about. I am not a SAHM nor are many of my peers. Our nanny, who is paid a lot more than $22, is patient, kind, empathetic, and able to enforce boundaries. I reject the idea that my children or any children are materially worse off because their mother works at Latham and Watkins et al instead of staying home with them all day. There are many SAHMs who are overwhelmed and struggle to meet the constant demands of parenting 24/7. I feel bad for them and their kids. I also know SAHMs with Nannie’s who were very checked out when their kids were little.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t want strangers raising my children.
They're probably better at it than you.
Why would a random daycare worker be better at taking care of kids than their own parent?
Yes, every parent is a fit to parent by virtue of being a parent. Anyone who is paid to provide childcare could never be as fit. 🙄
Of course this isn’t true. I’m way more qualified to raise my own kids vs some kid making $22/hour. YMMV.
Why are you more qualified?
Because I’m intelligent and extremely vested. I have three kids at top colleges who are kind, loving, empathetic kids so I’m proud of my work and investment in their lives. It worked in my case, again, YMMV.
And your children's memories will be mostly of the nanny raising them, while on her phone all day. Don't fool yourself. A childcare worker will never care for your children in the same way you will (I hope).
And no paid childcare worker is extremely intelligent or educated? I went to Williams for college and Columbia for grad school. My husband went to Harvard. I have three kids who I love and care about. I am not a SAHM nor are many of my peers. Our nanny, who is paid a lot more than $22, is patient, kind, empathetic, and able to enforce boundaries. I reject the idea that my children or any children are materially worse off because their mother works at Latham and Watkins et al instead of staying home with them all day. There are many SAHMs who are overwhelmed and struggle to meet the constant demands of parenting 24/7. I feel bad for them and their kids. I also know SAHMs with Nannie’s who were very checked out when their kids were little.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t want strangers raising my children.
+1
Also, I felt that my DH's salary was enough for us to fund college and retirement. If my DH was not making a good enough salary, I would have continued working so that my kids could afford college.
We had some lucky financial leg ups - we did not have college debt, we bought a nice new SFH in an inexpensive neighborhood at the bottom of the market and at a good interst rate (we accepted DH's long commute and mediocre public schools), our COL was low, we did not have pets, we only had two kids, we drive old cars, we did not have to look after our parents, we did not need IVF or therapy, we are heavily insured, we will never divorce or cheat etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, we had saved a lot of money (my own 401k an other investments were solid; jointly we were doing great), had all the right insurance set up, had a solid emergency fund, were in our forever home, liked our public schools if needed, DH's compensation was less than mine but solid and we had confidence in his career trajectory, and we both grew up with far less so we know how to scrape by in a pinch if it ever happened and took longer than expected for me to return to work.
On balance, we felt our kid's particular needs at the time were not compatible with the hours were both worked and something had to give (work life was far less flexible back then). I was confident that I would be happy taking on that role, even though giving up the work was not an easy choice (nor would it have been easy to go the other way).
As time went on, we became even more financially comfortable, our family needs increased, my time spent at nonpaying work became more and more valuable to me and the community. I never struggled to find intellectual stimulation or activities that were rewarding for me. Each time we revisited our family-work-life balance, we felt that the status quo was working best for us.
Valuable to the community, lol.
I’m not the PP, but volunteer work IS important to the community. Many vital jobs are unpaid whether you realize it or not.
They are not valuable if they are not paid. Seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, we had saved a lot of money (my own 401k an other investments were solid; jointly we were doing great), had all the right insurance set up, had a solid emergency fund, were in our forever home, liked our public schools if needed, DH's compensation was less than mine but solid and we had confidence in his career trajectory, and we both grew up with far less so we know how to scrape by in a pinch if it ever happened and took longer than expected for me to return to work.
On balance, we felt our kid's particular needs at the time were not compatible with the hours were both worked and something had to give (work life was far less flexible back then). I was confident that I would be happy taking on that role, even though giving up the work was not an easy choice (nor would it have been easy to go the other way).
As time went on, we became even more financially comfortable, our family needs increased, my time spent at nonpaying work became more and more valuable to me and the community. I never struggled to find intellectual stimulation or activities that were rewarding for me. Each time we revisited our family-work-life balance, we felt that the status quo was working best for us.
Valuable to the community, lol.
I’m not the PP, but volunteer work IS important to the community. Many vital jobs are unpaid whether you realize it or not.
They are not valuable if they are not paid. Seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, we had saved a lot of money (my own 401k an other investments were solid; jointly we were doing great), had all the right insurance set up, had a solid emergency fund, were in our forever home, liked our public schools if needed, DH's compensation was less than mine but solid and we had confidence in his career trajectory, and we both grew up with far less so we know how to scrape by in a pinch if it ever happened and took longer than expected for me to return to work.
On balance, we felt our kid's particular needs at the time were not compatible with the hours were both worked and something had to give (work life was far less flexible back then). I was confident that I would be happy taking on that role, even though giving up the work was not an easy choice (nor would it have been easy to go the other way).
As time went on, we became even more financially comfortable, our family needs increased, my time spent at nonpaying work became more and more valuable to me and the community. I never struggled to find intellectual stimulation or activities that were rewarding for me. Each time we revisited our family-work-life balance, we felt that the status quo was working best for us.
Valuable to the community, lol.
I’m not the PP, but volunteer work IS important to the community. Many vital jobs are unpaid whether you realize it or not.
They are not valuable if they are not paid. Seriously.
I'm a SAHP and I refused to get involved in volunteer work. Seriously, if I wanted a job, I'd go get one. Sure, I might chaperone a school trip, but not any more than a working parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, we had saved a lot of money (my own 401k an other investments were solid; jointly we were doing great), had all the right insurance set up, had a solid emergency fund, were in our forever home, liked our public schools if needed, DH's compensation was less than mine but solid and we had confidence in his career trajectory, and we both grew up with far less so we know how to scrape by in a pinch if it ever happened and took longer than expected for me to return to work.
On balance, we felt our kid's particular needs at the time were not compatible with the hours were both worked and something had to give (work life was far less flexible back then). I was confident that I would be happy taking on that role, even though giving up the work was not an easy choice (nor would it have been easy to go the other way).
As time went on, we became even more financially comfortable, our family needs increased, my time spent at nonpaying work became more and more valuable to me and the community. I never struggled to find intellectual stimulation or activities that were rewarding for me. Each time we revisited our family-work-life balance, we felt that the status quo was working best for us.
Valuable to the community, lol.
I’m not the PP, but volunteer work IS important to the community. Many vital jobs are unpaid whether you realize it or not.
They are not valuable if they are not paid. Seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, we had saved a lot of money (my own 401k an other investments were solid; jointly we were doing great), had all the right insurance set up, had a solid emergency fund, were in our forever home, liked our public schools if needed, DH's compensation was less than mine but solid and we had confidence in his career trajectory, and we both grew up with far less so we know how to scrape by in a pinch if it ever happened and took longer than expected for me to return to work.
On balance, we felt our kid's particular needs at the time were not compatible with the hours were both worked and something had to give (work life was far less flexible back then). I was confident that I would be happy taking on that role, even though giving up the work was not an easy choice (nor would it have been easy to go the other way).
As time went on, we became even more financially comfortable, our family needs increased, my time spent at nonpaying work became more and more valuable to me and the community. I never struggled to find intellectual stimulation or activities that were rewarding for me. Each time we revisited our family-work-life balance, we felt that the status quo was working best for us.
Valuable to the community, lol.
I’m not the PP, but volunteer work IS important to the community. Many vital jobs are unpaid whether you realize it or not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, we had saved a lot of money (my own 401k an other investments were solid; jointly we were doing great), had all the right insurance set up, had a solid emergency fund, were in our forever home, liked our public schools if needed, DH's compensation was less than mine but solid and we had confidence in his career trajectory, and we both grew up with far less so we know how to scrape by in a pinch if it ever happened and took longer than expected for me to return to work.
On balance, we felt our kid's particular needs at the time were not compatible with the hours were both worked and something had to give (work life was far less flexible back then). I was confident that I would be happy taking on that role, even though giving up the work was not an easy choice (nor would it have been easy to go the other way).
As time went on, we became even more financially comfortable, our family needs increased, my time spent at nonpaying work became more and more valuable to me and the community. I never struggled to find intellectual stimulation or activities that were rewarding for me. Each time we revisited our family-work-life balance, we felt that the status quo was working best for us.
Valuable to the community, lol.
Anonymous wrote:For me, we had saved a lot of money (my own 401k an other investments were solid; jointly we were doing great), had all the right insurance set up, had a solid emergency fund, were in our forever home, liked our public schools if needed, DH's compensation was less than mine but solid and we had confidence in his career trajectory, and we both grew up with far less so we know how to scrape by in a pinch if it ever happened and took longer than expected for me to return to work.
On balance, we felt our kid's particular needs at the time were not compatible with the hours were both worked and something had to give (work life was far less flexible back then). I was confident that I would be happy taking on that role, even though giving up the work was not an easy choice (nor would it have been easy to go the other way).
As time went on, we became even more financially comfortable, our family needs increased, my time spent at nonpaying work became more and more valuable to me and the community. I never struggled to find intellectual stimulation or activities that were rewarding for me. Each time we revisited our family-work-life balance, we felt that the status quo was working best for us.
Anonymous wrote:For me, we had saved a lot of money (my own 401k an other investments were solid; jointly we were doing great), had all the right insurance set up, had a solid emergency fund, were in our forever home, liked our public schools if needed, DH's compensation was less than mine but solid and we had confidence in his career trajectory, and we both grew up with far less so we know how to scrape by in a pinch if it ever happened and took longer than expected for me to return to work.
On balance, we felt our kid's particular needs at the time were not compatible with the hours were both worked and something had to give (work life was far less flexible back then). I was confident that I would be happy taking on that role, even though giving up the work was not an easy choice (nor would it have been easy to go the other way).
As time went on, we became even more financially comfortable, our family needs increased, my time spent at nonpaying work became more and more valuable to me and the community. I never struggled to find intellectual stimulation or activities that were rewarding for me. Each time we revisited our family-work-life balance, we felt that the status quo was working best for us.
Anonymous wrote:I had a bunch of money and I didn’t/don’t really care about my career.
If you need your career or you just like it, personally I think it would be better to find a full time nanny/housekeeper. Pay them well and make them part of the family. Even if it eats most of your salary for a while.