Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Women have nothing to fear from trans women. Trans women are not interested in being in women’s spaces for a sexual thrill. They need to be in those spaces because they ARE women. If they stayed in male spaces, they would likely be raped.”

^This. Transwomen are women and forcing them into a gross and dangerous men’s bathroom would be cruel and dangerous.

Some people insist on misgendering transwomen. Those people are called bigots. Their hatred is being gradually criminalized, so so this problem will solve itself. Republicans aren’t going to be able to run on this issue on 2028 without running afoul of the law.

Define "woman", then, please.

Any person who chooses to identify as a woman, IS a woman.


See how easy that was, trumpie? Blows your mind that it could be soooo simple, huh?

Good grief, do you know how ridiculous you sound? What if they want to identify as a platypus? Does that make it so?

+1
Absolutely nutty. I actually think they're either trolls, or proud to be so openly bizarre.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here have every competed in an athletic event with a trans person?

The OP makes a good point. This isn’t about sports, it’s about sex. Few women have ever competed against trans athletes. But many, many men have felt attracted to a transwoman and then felt shame and communication at their own arousal. A friend of mine was seduced, roofied, and robbed by a transwoman. And he feels weird about it because if his cultural conditioning. Not the robbery, the hookup. His own attraction for the female’s male spaces. OP is right. The issue Republican men have with trans folks isn’t about sports and it isn’t even about trans folks themselves. It’s about the fragile male ego, about desire, and about feeling ashamed of one’s own desires. Republican men don’t need trans bans, they need therapy.

Your post is pure insanity.

+100
The PP and others spewing the same garbage are clearly mentally ill. Who even thinks like that? The UK is ahead of the US on this issue:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/what-the-uk-ruling-on-the-definition-of-woman-means-for-same-sex-spaces-culture-wars-and-more/ar-AA1DdAWm?ocid=BingNewsSerp

There are no men’s sports, only women’s sports. All the major pro leagues allow women (NBA, NHL, NFL, MLB, MLS, PGA etc.) They have no gender rule, if there is a woman who can hoop like LeBron she will go #1 in the draft.

This Oliver guy isn't coming across as very intelligent pretty one sided really. I mean no advantages. There they are this past summer two women with Y chromosomes ( cis not trans ), battling it out for silver and gold for boxing at the summer games. Griner (cis not trans) WNBA 6'8" *woman* that can dunk.
https://www.elle.com/culture/career-politics/interviews/a12606/brittney-griner-profile/

The point is athletics are about the extremes places where science doesn't perform very well. However, it should be noted that it wouldn't take very many trans or even cis athletes to turn women's athletics into a circus. Furthermore, what you have to understand is that these are businesses an WNBA team is trying to make money. No one is going to go see a team of trans-thletes from Transylvania compete. I don't think men are interested in it nor are women. It's a business decision. There is precedent. They banned Marfan syndrome in the NBA, no one wants to go watch a guy dunk then have a heart attack. Yeah, it's sad, start a non-for-profit the end.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Boston Marathon now allows biological men in all three winner categories: men, binary (all winners have been biological men in this mixed group) and women.

At what point do we recognize this as anti woman?

Trans women ARE women!

How many times do we need to keep repeating this until you accept it?

They are NOT biological women. Just because you can outside in your penis does not make you a woman. Biological women should perform against other biological women. Period.

Well, if biological women don’t like their results in marathons then they should just train more a run faster.

Why do we have male and female marathon award categories? Do you understand why they exist in the first place?

Anonymous wrote:I think conservatives just want to see female athletes naked, the younger the better, and the whole "trans" thing is a smoke screen.

Please please please adopt this as Democratic Party campaign talking points.

- Definitely not a Republican

Anonymous wrote:I think conservatives just want to see female athletes naked, the younger the better, and the whole "trans" thing is a smoke screen.

+1. They want to see females naked. But not trans females. Because that would make them feel icky and gross and gay. Which is why they’re so dead set against trans women being in women’s sports. Because they only want to see the women without penises. It’s pure homophobia.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Women have nothing to fear from trans women. Trans women are not interested in being in women’s spaces for a sexual thrill. They need to be in those spaces because they ARE women. If they stayed in male spaces, they would likely be raped.”

^This. Transwomen are women and forcing them into a gross and dangerous men’s bathroom would be cruel and dangerous.

Some people insist on misgendering transwomen. Those people are called bigots. Their hatred is being gradually criminalized, so so this problem will solve itself. Republicans aren’t going to be able to run on this issue on 2028 without running afoul of the law.

Define "woman", then, please.

Any person who chooses to identify as a woman, IS a woman.


See how easy that was, trumpie? Blows your mind that it could be soooo simple, huh?

Good grief, do you know how ridiculous you sound? What if they want to identify as a platypus? Does that make it so?

You’re the one who sounds stupid here. And hateful and bigoted too.

I think conservatives just want to see female athletes naked, the younger the better, and the whole "trans" thing is a smoke screen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Women have nothing to fear from trans women. Trans women are not interested in being in women’s spaces for a sexual thrill. They need to be in those spaces because they ARE women. If they stayed in male spaces, they would likely be raped.”

^This. Transwomen are women and forcing them into a gross and dangerous men’s bathroom would be cruel and dangerous.

Some people insist on misgendering transwomen. Those people are called bigots. Their hatred is being gradually criminalized, so so this problem will solve itself. Republicans aren’t going to be able to run on this issue on 2028 without running afoul of the law.

Define "woman", then, please.

Any person who chooses to identify as a woman, IS a woman.


See how easy that was, trumpie? Blows your mind that it could be soooo simple, huh?

Good grief, do you know how ridiculous you sound? What if they want to identify as a platypus? Does that make it so?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Boston Marathon now allows biological men in all three winner categories: men, binary (all winners have been biological men in this mixed group) and women.

At what point do we recognize this as anti woman?

Trans women ARE women!

How many times do we need to keep repeating this until you accept it?

They are NOT biological women. Just because you can outside in your penis does not make you a woman. Biological women should perform against other biological women. Period.

Well, if biological women don’t like their results in marathons then they should just train more a run faster.

+100, stop with the whining already FFS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Boston Marathon now allows biological men in all three winner categories: men, binary (all winners have been biological men in this mixed group) and women.

At what point do we recognize this as anti woman?

Trans women ARE women!

How many times do we need to keep repeating this until you accept it?

They are NOT biological women. Just because you can outside in your penis does not make you a woman. Biological women should perform against other biological women. Period.

No one said it made them “biological women”. Because it’s an irrelevant term. The only thing that matters is how they choose to identify. Stop living in 1994.