Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was the founder of a non-profit legit? That’s the type of thing an AO will look into
That's the first thing I thought to. She should have left that off. That just looks like striving at that point, and calls into question whether the drive is from student or the parents.
And OP: you may want to talk to your daugther about making assumptions about other people's stats. Maybe people who got into Princeton had lower grades, maybe they didn't. Either way, they had something that Princeton wanted and it's just so poisonous to talk about other students that way.
But it's true. Many of her peers that got in to one of the schools she was WL/rejected do. It's just speaking the truth.
DP. How would you know this?
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else facing a lot of disappointment during this cycle? DD got into a couple target schools + most of her safeties... Rejected or WL from the rest. She was (imo and told to us by many others) a great applicant - High stats, great ECs + essays, LORs... Her interviews all went very well, especially JHU. She applied to JHU EA and the rest RD, and we're from NOVA. Intended major is BME (biomed engineering).
Stats:
4.0 UW/4.7 W GPA
1570 SAT (800 M, 770 R&W)
14 APs, all 5s
ECs:
- A few regional awards (STEM)
- 200+ volunteer hours @ local hospital
- Founder of non-profit
- Research w/ prof at T30
- Competitive summer program for BME
- Lots of community service
Results:
JHU EA - Deferred -> Rejected
Princeton - Rejected
Brown - Rejected
Dartmouth - Rejected
Columbia - Rejected
Duke - Rejected
UVA - WL
Cornell - WL
CMU - WL
UNC CH - WL
VT - Accepted
W&M - Accepted
Lehigh - Accepted
UPitt - Accepted
DD is incredibly upset and so are we... JHU was her dream school but she relied on UVA + CMU as well. Anyone here confused and facing a similar situation?We all were convinced that DD had it in the bag - Worst of all is that many of her classmates w/ lower stats and worse ECs have gotten into a few of these schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How on earth would you know the stats and ECs of any child other than your own?
DD obviously told me, I think it's pretty common to know these things about some of your classmates.
Anonymous wrote:For all the posters here who are speculating about the weak spots in OP’s kid’s application (EC’s personality, no sports, etc), how many kids DON’T have a weak or weaker part of their application? Even if the “whole package” is great? We don’t know the kid. We don’t know what went on during the admissions review of her applications. We don’t know the kid’s school who else from her school applied to the same schools. OP came here looking for support. Let’s see what we can do to make things better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was the founder of a non-profit legit? That’s the type of thing an AO will look into
That's the first thing I thought to. She should have left that off. That just looks like striving at that point, and calls into question whether the drive is from student or the parents.
And OP: you may want to talk to your daugther about making assumptions about other people's stats. Maybe people who got into Princeton had lower grades, maybe they didn't. Either way, they had something that Princeton wanted and it's just so poisonous to talk about other students that way.
But it's true. Many of her peers that got in to one of the schools she was WL/rejected do. It's just speaking the truth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has to be fake. People cannot be this naive.
+100
How utterly ridiculous - she "thought she had it in the bag."![]()
![]()
Right? Who thinks like this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was the founder of a non-profit legit? That’s the type of thing an AO will look into
That's the first thing I thought to. She should have left that off. That just looks like striving at that point, and calls into question whether the drive is from student or the parents.
And OP: you may want to talk to your daugther about making assumptions about other people's stats. Maybe people who got into Princeton had lower grades, maybe they didn't. Either way, they had something that Princeton wanted and it's just so poisonous to talk about other students that way.
But it's true. Many of her peers that got in to one of the schools she was WL/rejected do. It's just speaking the truth.
Anonymous wrote: +100
How utterly ridiculous - she "thought she had it in the bag."![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who finds HS founders of non-profits to be borderline insulting? I worked in the non-profit world, so did dh. These are serious places and it takes as much (if not more) work than a business to be a really successful one. I know bc we now own a successful business. It's not some vanity project to be started by a 17 year old. So annoying. Change my mind.
Anonymous wrote:How on earth would you know the stats and ECs of any child other than your own?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has to be fake. People cannot be this naive.
+100
How utterly ridiculous - she "thought she had it in the bag."![]()
![]()