Anonymous wrote:They are sad, searching for something in their lives. Deep down they know what they're missing. I pray they lose the blinders and turn to the one who loves them unconditionally before their hearts are forever hardened.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I assume you are being intentionally provocative and trolling. I also assume you know that atheism is a position on religion and this is a religion forum, so it would be unusual to post an atheist position in any other type of forum.
If I did not assume those things, I would have to assume you are just really, really stupid. But I don’t think that is the case.
Very true.
OP just woke up on a slow Saturday and decided to attack some people, with the "I'm just asking!" spiel.
Anonymous wrote:They are sad, searching for something in their lives. Deep down they know what they're missing. I pray they lose the blinders and turn to the one who loves them unconditionally before their hearts are forever hardened.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.
Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?
What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.
DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.
I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.
Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.
DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?
Whataboutism,
If you are interested in Jesus, you should also be interested in other religious figures.
Not logical rebuttal but rather an attempt to shift focus.
Why "should" pp be interested in other religious figures if they are interested in Jesus?
I see no "should". It was a very basic question. If you are afraid to actually answer, that speaks volumes about your ability to make a reasonable argument.
Don't make it more than it is. It is a simple compare and contrast type question that we all learned in 3rd grade English.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.
Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?
What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.
DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.
I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.
Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.
DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?
Whataboutism,
If you are interested in Jesus, you should also be interested in other religious figures.
Not logical rebuttal but rather an attempt to shift focus.
Why "should" pp be interested in other religious figures if they are interested in Jesus?
I see no "should". It was a very basic question. If you are afraid to actually answer, that speaks volumes about your ability to make a reasonable argument.
Anonymous wrote:They are sad, searching for something in their lives. Deep down they know what they're missing. I pray they lose the blinders and turn to the one who loves them unconditionally before their hearts are forever hardened.
Anonymous wrote:They are sad, searching for something in their lives. Deep down they know what they're missing. I pray they lose the blinders and turn to the one who loves them unconditionally before their hearts are forever hardened.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.
Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?
What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.
DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.
I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.
Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.
DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?
Whataboutism,
If you are interested in Jesus, you should also be interested in other religious figures.
Not logical rebuttal but rather an attempt to shift focus.
Why "should" pp be interested in other religious figures if they are interested in Jesus?
I see no "should". It was a very basic question. If you are afraid to actually answer, that speaks volumes about your ability to make a reasonable argument.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.
Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?
What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.
DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.
I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.
Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.
DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?
Whataboutism,
If you are interested in Jesus, you should also be interested in other religious figures.
Not logical rebuttal but rather an attempt to shift focus.
Why "should" pp be interested in other religious figures if they are interested in Jesus?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.
Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?
What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.
DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.
I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.
Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.
DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?
Whataboutism,
If you are interested in Jesus, you should also be interested in other religious figures.
Not logical rebuttal but rather an attempt to shift focus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.
Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?
What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.
DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.
I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.
Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.
DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.
Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?
What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.
DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.
I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.
Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.
Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?
What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.
DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.
I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.
Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.
Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?
What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.
DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.
I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.