Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.

Agreed

MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.

Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.

ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral

Pay attention.

Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.

Who is moving from ECNL to MLSN2?

Someone said earlier that MLSN2 is the equivalent of ECRL
They were being corrected

You saying ECRL is better than MLSN2 seems like bluster. For pay to play, they are both 2nd tier, so about the same seems about right.

ECNL is MLSN2

Remember, the clubs that had both ECNL and MLS Next before ecnl forced the split?

The ECNL teams were the 2nd teams, which are now the MLSN2 teams.

Poster on another thread showed boys team rankings. After MLSN academies, MLSN and ECNL were the same. Unless are performing a stock pump and dump, I have no idea why you would care either way for these leagues, they all come and go. Local MLSN academy can't even fund one U14 team so not a good sign for financial longevity there. What's next after MLSN folds? Who knows.

Anonymous wrote:Very confused about this whole MLSNII situation as we are seeing those who are being offered MLSNII are second and third team players at ECNL clubs or coming from lower level travel clubs. So you would have to say for PP that MLSNII is equal or lower than ECRL. Even more leagues to cause even more confusion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Virginia only has only 8 teams, the least number of teams of all the regions. Does this mean 18 games for the whole year?

Lmao and look at the teams VRSC LOUDOUN SOCCER TSJ… you’re asked to drop 4K to play the same shitty teams that you play in spring’s NCSL.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.

Agreed

MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.

Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.

ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral

Pay attention.

Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.

It’s called MLSNext. Please keep the 4 letter acronym for the dumpster fire ECNL.

Too late, that ship has sailed, you are pissin in the wind.

So MLSN2 or MLSNII? And is Liverpool in MLSN3 or MLSN III?

What's kinda funny is that MLSN has not even released what they are calling their new league. The clubs that got it don't even know lol! That's why you see a bunch of clubs that only have MLSN2 advertising that they are having tryouts for "MLSNext!". Such a bizarre and half-assed way to release something. It makes me think they weren't quite ready and just released this to get it out prior to tryouts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.

Agreed

MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.

Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.

ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral

Pay attention.

Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.

It’s called MLSNext. Please keep the 4 letter acronym for the dumpster fire ECNL.

Too late, that ship has sailed, you are pissin in the wind.

So MLSN2 or MLSNII? And is Liverpool in MLSN3 or MLSN III?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.

Agreed

MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.

Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.

ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral

Pay attention.

Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.

It’s called MLSNext. Please keep the 4 letter acronym for the dumpster fire ECNL.

Anonymous wrote:I think NAL will be renamed MLSN II. Currently, NAL is just for teams that have their first teams on MLSN.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.

Agreed

MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.

Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.

ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral

Pay attention.

Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Virginia only has only 8 teams, the least number of teams of all the regions. Does this mean 18 games for the whole year?

Lmao and look at the teams VRSC LOUDOUN SOCCER TSJ… you’re asked to drop 4K to play the same shitty teams that you play in spring’s NCSL.

Anonymous wrote:Virginia only has only 8 teams, the least number of teams of all the regions. Does this mean 18 games for the whole year?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2013 will destroy all those B teams in MLSN2. They belong in the top tier of MLSN.

Agreed

MLS Next II account the clubs that are in it. Each club has different level of teams. So Coppermine probably already has a team in MLS Next and this is their next lower team in MLS Next II.

Coppermine was in ECRL not MLSN. So just a lateral move, ECRL to MLS2. Probably made the move because ECRL North Atlantic and Northeast South have weird overlaps so forces too much unnecessary travel for a regional league. They weren't even in the same ECRL league as Celtic and Pipeline.

ECNL to MLSN2 is lateral

Pay attention.

Yes, and ECNL for boys is just not the place to be. Any MLSN team is a better option, same applies to MLNSII.

Who is moving from ECNL to MLSN2?

Someone said earlier that MLSN2 is the equivalent of ECRL
They were being corrected

You saying ECRL is better than MLSN2 seems like bluster. For pay to play, they are both 2nd tier, so about the same seems about right.

ECNL is MLSN2

Remember, the clubs that had both ECNL and MLS Next before ecnl forced the split?

The ECNL teams were the 2nd teams, which are now the MLSN2 teams.

Poster on another thread showed boys team rankings. After MLSN academies, MLSN and ECNL were the same. Unless are performing a stock pump and dump, I have no idea why you would care either way for these leagues, they all come and go. Local MLSN academy can't even fund one U14 team so not a good sign for financial longevity there. What's next after MLSN folds? Who knows.