Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP: I'm a Gen X who has attended Catholic Mass in English, Spanish, Italian, Tagalog, Latin (once, as an adult in Rome), and Irish; I've also attended Mass with traditional old school liturgical music, folk music, rock music, monastic chanting, and Black spiritual gospel music. PP is correct that there are parishes that regularly use the Latin Mass as a choice, so yes there are children being raise with it. There are many ways to participate in the Mass, and that has nothing to do with U.S. politics.
I believe the broader point these two are struggling to discuss is that, while the Latin mass has zero to do with U.S. politics (after all, it's said worldwide in a small number of parishes), it is also simultaneously true that those who are strong proponents of attending them regularly in the U.S. instead of common language Mass (and who perhaps also join groups like the Arlington Latin Mass Society or Opus Dei) also overlap widely on a ven diagram with those who vote Republican and may also be politically right wing Trump voters. You are far less likely to find support for Trump at a folk Mass in Massachusetts, for example.
In the U.S., Catholics, on average, year over year, are politically 50/50 R/D, which is normal and wholly appropriate, including among those who have taken religious vows. I don't personally know many nuns or priests who don't speak out against Trump's politics and who are sad that people voted for him (as am I). They are also busy working to protect those this administration aims to harm (as am I), as they should be given vows they have taken.
To the PP who suggests American Catholics will break from the Roman Catholic Church, I do not think it likely, but if anyone did, they would a minority and entirely among the right wing crowd, who I personally agree seem to have lost their way.
Thank you. I appreciate your comments. However, I would agree with the other poster in that we are not struggling. I am talking about the US Church and what I would safely assume is a he is attempting to mansplain the worldwide Church. Despite what he thinks, there is a strong correlation between Opus Dei and R politics and Becket and Teneo and all of that. There also exists the same nihilism between the right wing within the Catholic Church and MAGA.
I disagree with you regarding the Latin Mass here in the US. IME there are very few who may have grown up with a Latin Mass so much so that they are statistically insignificant. Among GenX and younger in this country there is no natural affinity for the Latin Mass. A cradle Catholic, I have only recently started seeing hymn books with the Latin Mass in the them. Forcing the Latin Mass on the general population is some really weird, backwards arse sh*t that needs to be called out for what it is. This may be more of a discussion for the religion thread, but here we are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, I supposed he thinks he's more Catholic than the Pope. These right wing Catholics are SO arrogant.
Also, Refugess are LEGAL immigrants.
Oof. This gave me a ghost of Henry VIII chill. When do American Catholics break away from Rome and declare Vance head of the Catholic Church in America and ALL churches.
There are already right wing US sects who consider themselves Catholic. Many of them say Mass in Latin.
Yes and Opus Dei
Today's version of the John Birch Society.
Have you ever met a member of Opus Dei? Attended one of their liturgies or events? Consulted one of their priests? Read any of their publications?
You genuinely don’t know what you’re talking about.
Not PP: But yes I have, and they are cuckoo.
Pejorative epithets may be the safe harbor of the intellectually deficient, but they hardly explain the purported defects in the beliefs and practices of Opus Dei adherents.
Dude, I am a graduate of one of the top SLACs in this country and have two advanced degrees from an Ivy League institution. I am more than intellectually sufficient and I call it like I see it.
LOL. THAT explains things.
Anonymous wrote:NP: I'm a Gen X who has attended Catholic Mass in English, Spanish, Italian, Tagalog, Latin (once, as an adult in Rome), and Irish; I've also attended Mass with traditional old school liturgical music, folk music, rock music, monastic chanting, and Black spiritual gospel music. PP is correct that there are parishes that regularly use the Latin Mass as a choice, so yes there are children being raise with it. There are many ways to participate in the Mass, and that has nothing to do with U.S. politics.
I believe the broader point these two are struggling to discuss is that, while the Latin mass has zero to do with U.S. politics (after all, it's said worldwide in a small number of parishes), it is also simultaneously true that those who are strong proponents of attending them regularly in the U.S. instead of common language Mass (and who perhaps also join groups like the Arlington Latin Mass Society or Opus Dei) also overlap widely on a ven diagram with those who vote Republican and may also be politically right wing Trump voters. You are far less likely to find support for Trump at a folk Mass in Massachusetts, for example.
In the U.S., Catholics, on average, year over year, are politically 50/50 R/D, which is normal and wholly appropriate, including among those who have taken religious vows. I don't personally know many nuns or priests who don't speak out against Trump's politics and who are sad that people voted for him (as am I). They are also busy working to protect those this administration aims to harm (as am I), as they should be given vows they have taken.
To the PP who suggests American Catholics will break from the Roman Catholic Church, I do not think it likely, but if anyone did, they would a minority and entirely among the right wing crowd, who I personally agree seem to have lost their way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, I supposed he thinks he's more Catholic than the Pope. These right wing Catholics are SO arrogant.
Also, Refugess are LEGAL immigrants.
Oof. This gave me a ghost of Henry VIII chill. When do American Catholics break away from Rome and declare Vance head of the Catholic Church in America and ALL churches.
There are already right wing US sects who consider themselves Catholic. Many of them say Mass in Latin.
Yes and Opus Dei
Today's version of the John Birch Society.
Have you ever met a member of Opus Dei? Attended one of their liturgies or events? Consulted one of their priests? Read any of their publications?
You genuinely don’t know what you’re talking about.
Not PP: But yes I have, and they are cuckoo.
Pejorative epithets may be the safe harbor of the intellectually deficient, but they hardly explain the purported defects in the beliefs and practices of Opus Dei adherents.
Dude, I am a graduate of one of the top SLACs in this country and have two advanced degrees from an Ivy League institution. I am more than intellectually sufficient and I call it like I see it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Op is a liar. Catholic Charities is NOT the Catholic Church. It’s an arm.
He was attacking the USCCB, the Catholic Bishops' Conference, which is the US' highest authority of leadership within the Catholic Church. If they aren't Catholic, then who is, exactly? Certainly not JD Vance.
Yeah Vance converts like ten minutes ago, likely for entirely political reasons, and now he’s like “all that help the poor and welcome the stranger stuff seems too woke.” Pathetic.
Bingo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As polling goes, the majority of Catholics voted for Trump. There are culturally conservative Catholics and theologically conservative Catholics. There's no shortage of Catholics who disagree with the liberal wing of the church. The tensions are pretty well known. Not sure why OP is trying to make a mountain out of a molehill. Is she saying people aren't allowed to criticize institutions, even ones they are part of?
How many Catholics believe the reason the US Conference of Bishops operates Catholic Charities, and that Catholic Charities helps resettle refugees, is because the Catholic Church is eager to make money bringing illegal immigrants into the country?
That’s not disagreeing with the policies of the Church, that’s slander. And if support for Catholic Charities’ work is now limited to the “liberal wing” of the Church then I think you’ve really lost the plot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Op is a liar. Catholic Charities is NOT the Catholic Church. It’s an arm.
He was attacking the USCCB, the Catholic Bishops' Conference, which is the US' highest authority of leadership within the Catholic Church. If they aren't Catholic, then who is, exactly? Certainly not JD Vance.
Yeah Vance converts like ten minutes ago, likely for entirely political reasons, and now he’s like “all that help the poor and welcome the stranger stuff seems too woke.” Pathetic.
Anonymous wrote:
Op is a liar. Catholic Charities is NOT the Catholic Church. It’s an arm.
Anonymous wrote:NP: I'm a Gen X who has attended Catholic Mass in English, Spanish, Italian, Tagalog, Latin (once, as an adult in Rome), and Irish; I've also attended Mass with traditional old school liturgical music, folk music, rock music, monastic chanting, and Black spiritual gospel music. PP is correct that there are parishes that regularly use the Latin Mass as a choice, so yes there are children being raise with it. There are many ways to participate in the Mass, and that has nothing to do with U.S. politics.
I believe the broader point these two are struggling to discuss is that, while the Latin mass has zero to do with U.S. politics (after all, it's said worldwide in a small number of parishes), it is also simultaneously true that those who are strong proponents of attending them regularly in the U.S. instead of common language Mass (and who perhaps also join groups like the Arlington Latin Mass Society or Opus Dei) also overlap widely on a ven diagram with those who vote Republican and may also be politically right wing Trump voters. You are far less likely to find support for Trump at a folk Mass in Massachusetts, for example.
In the U.S., Catholics, on average, year over year, are politically 50/50 R/D, which is normal and wholly appropriate, including among those who have taken religious vows. I don't personally know many nuns or priests who don't speak out against Trump's politics and who are sad that people voted for him (as am I). They are also busy working to protect those this administration aims to harm (as am I), as they should be given vows they have taken.
To the PP who suggests American Catholics will break from the Roman Catholic Church, I do not think it likely, but if anyone did, they would a minority and entirely among the right wing crowd, who I personally agree seem to have lost their way.
Anonymous wrote:I just don’t get people who claim to be religious Christians yet ignore the core teachings of the Gospels.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, I supposed he thinks he's more Catholic than the Pope. These right wing Catholics are SO arrogant.
Also, Refugees are LEGAL immigrants.
I wonder if the converts are worse that those brought up Catholic.
What's the saying: the recent convert is the biggest zealot.