Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's bad for women. It makes it look like it's easy and now men will expect all women should be back at work with no break. Even 6 weeks is not enough and other countries give women like a year off paid. Maybe she didn't want to lose her job so felt pressured to go back to work early?

Like Kate Middleton coming down the hospital stairs in stilettos and full make up hours after giving birth.

Imagine expecting women to be able to walk after giving birth. Crazy!

I walked to the nursery a few hours after delivery and just about fainted. They had to bring me back to my room in a wheel chair. I was terrified that Kate Middleton was going to drop the baby on the steps. And she must have had industrial sized pads underneath that dress.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when society keeps telling women that career comes before their physical and mental health and all other aspects of their lives including their infants.

No this is what happens when women have choice,

She can choose to bring the baby to work, her h can choose to take paternity, she can choose to do part of her job not all of it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for the baby.

The baby has a loving, involved, healthy mother. Nothing to feel bad about, put your empathy to use in places where it will actually matter.

This is a time for mom and baby to bond. She is not poor. She can afford to stay home. It's sad she would prefer to go to work. She will never get this time back.

I'd have enjoyed baby time a lot more if I had breaks from it and more help and sleep.

Going to work is not getting a break and getting more sleep.

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when society keeps telling women that career comes before their physical and mental health and all other aspects of their lives including their infants.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for the baby.

Why? The baby doesn't know it's mother from Adam's house cat. As long as there is someone to feed, change, and hold it is all the baby cares about.

This is the time to build a bond of trust and babies know voice of their mothers, often fathers too.

Anonymous wrote:Stepping back a bit, this situation gives me pause because we've set up a culture where there is this feeling that this time of life: pregnancy, giving birth, new parents, new baby, is just another thing on the to-do list.

In a case by case basis, sure, I'm happy for this coach who is able to get make the choice to get back to work for a bit during a peak time in her career. Great for those who can, but why, as a culture, don't we value this time?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Knew a woman who adopted a newborn and went back to her demanding medical job 3 days after bringing the less-than-a-week old baby home.

She has a very, very healthy trust fund, no mortgage, no car payments, etc. and does not need the money.

I didn't understand this. At all.

You don’t understand why wealthy men work?

Why adopt. a baby then? You can't give it a few weeks of attention?

Idk this woman.
My friend found out on a Friday she was adopting a baby on Monday.

She needed to train someone to do her job so worked the 1st month she had the baby.

Which only shows how bad our adoption process is. Why didn't this parent have a plan in place with employer for this scenario?

Studies have already shown there is a primal loss from mother at that age, then the infant gets stuck with a caregiver because it's more important for adoptive mom to train someone rather than provide the infant bonding time for a month.