Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Email from POPA says examiners are safe to continue work from home.
But supervisors are screwed?
Supervisors and anyone non-bargaining, like OGC, OCFO, etc.
Yes, we're screwed.
And we take zero appropriated funds. So you're saving exactly nothing by doing this and if/when people leave.
+1 Most Americans don't know that USPTO is fully funded by fees for patents and trademarks. No tax dollars, at all.
This is going to have a disastrous impact on American IP even if it's non-bargaining employees required to RTO. It's hard enough to recruit talent leaders in any position. Think about IT and cybersecurity positions.
Pretty sure Leon plans to RIF most feds anyway and replace them with AI. PTO examiners who stare at computers all day reviewing seem like a prime target for AI replacement.
That would be a hell of an AI system
I wonder what sort of nonsense an AI examiner would hallucinate? As a patent practitioner, at least I might find it amusing appealing something like that.
We've received responses from attorneys that must have been made using AI. It makes up case law.
I worked at the PTO as a trademark examiner over 15 years ago. We had to learn keyboard codes connected to different sentences and paragraphs that would write the letters. We were not allowed to draft the letters ourselves.
That's definitely not the case today and I doubt it was 15 year years ago.
Anonymous wrote:Is it true that the Commissioner of Patents has forked?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With current technology, the process at the USPTO may become much faster and more efficient—you never know.
Just keep in mind that no one is irreplaceable; any job can potentially be taken over by someone else
Very difficult. Quality SPEs and Primaries are small. Takes many years to rise the ranks before one of those get replaced.
Anonymous wrote:With current technology, the process at the USPTO may become much faster and more efficient—you never know.
Just keep in mind that no one is irreplaceable; any job can potentially be taken over by someone else
Anonymous wrote:With current technology, the process at the USPTO may become much faster and more efficient—you never know.
Just keep in mind that no one is irreplaceable; any job can potentially be taken over by someone else
Anonymous wrote:How's the cafeteria in Alexandria doing? That was always a nice place, prior to the pandemic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Email from POPA says examiners are safe to continue work from home.
But supervisors are screwed?
Supervisors and anyone non-bargaining, like OGC, OCFO, etc.
Yes, we're screwed.
And we take zero appropriated funds. So you're saving exactly nothing by doing this and if/when people leave.
+1 Most Americans don't know that USPTO is fully funded by fees for patents and trademarks. No tax dollars, at all.
This is going to have a disastrous impact on American IP even if it's non-bargaining employees required to RTO. It's hard enough to recruit talent leaders in any position. Think about IT and cybersecurity positions.
Pretty sure Leon plans to RIF most feds anyway and replace them with AI. PTO examiners who stare at computers all day reviewing seem like a prime target for AI replacement.
That would be a hell of an AI system
I wonder what sort of nonsense an AI examiner would hallucinate? As a patent practitioner, at least I might find it amusing appealing something like that.
We've received responses from attorneys that must have been made using AI. It makes up case law.
I worked at the PTO as a trademark examiner over 15 years ago. We had to learn keyboard codes connected to different sentences and paragraphs that would write the letters. We were not allowed to draft the letters ourselves.