Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Combat is a lethal exercise.

Males are better at combat as a sex.

Period.

They evolved or designed for it or whatever argument you want. Male v. Female hand to hand combat results in female losing 95% of the time.

Great cite some sources HE-MAN. I've seem some incredible strong women and I have seen scrawny men....you sound stupid

I’m a pretty ordinary but otherwise fit guy, probably a similar level of fitness to a typical active duty soldier in his 30’s, based on what I’ve seen from military guys at tough mudder events I’ve competed it. I’m fit, but nothing outrageous. That being said, I’m probably physically stronger than 99+% of all women alive. Sure, I’ll definitely concede that perhaps a few women in a thousand might be stronger than me.

But is that REALLY the standard of comparison you want to use to bolster your point?

That .05% or fewer of women are equal to or stronger than a completely average fit male?

That’s what you want to stand on? Seriously?




You really shouldn’t be calling others “stupid”.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Combat is a lethal exercise.

Males are better at combat as a sex.

Period.

They evolved or designed for it or whatever argument you want. Male v. Female hand to hand combat results in female losing 95% of the time.

Great cite some sources HE-MAN. I've seem some incredible strong women and I have seen scrawny men....you sound stupid

Do you need a scientific journal article telling you men are stronger than women? Infantry/combat arms breaks even strong men. I work in military medicine. Infantry men generally lose an inch of height if they are in several years due to vertebrae compression from carrying such heavy loads over a long period of time. The physical toll is real. It isn’t for women. Even strong women

You are a f’ing idiot. Seriously oh people shrink from wearing a pack! How many days a year does B11 carry a pack over 2-4 year enlistment?

Here is something for you. Vietnamese soldiers were significantly smaller than American soldiers with the typical Vietnamese soldier being around 5 inches shorter and weighing roughly 43 pounds less than an American soldier. Yet they were able to defeat an all male American military. It was the same in WW2 with the Japanese. The US got its a$$ kicked fighting the Japanese.

Women are more than capable of fighting in the US military. The Russian had 800,000 women in combat during WW2. Some how they were able to pull the trigger.

Small men are not analogous to women. Tall women are not analogous to men. You really need to get that through your thick skull. Sex-based physical differences are immutable and salient across height and weight. Short, slim men are nonetheless stronger across many, many measures of strength, athleticism, and power than tall, heavyset women. I'm sorry if this activates your inferiority complex.

Sincerely,

Woman who doesn't need to pretend women are physically equal to men in order to feel comfortable as a woman

yOu’Re liTeRalLy mUrDeriNg eQuItY !!!