Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After all these sleazy pardons, Dems are going to have to lie even more than usual to try to maintain the moral highground.

what is sleazy about protecting a doctor who has been a public servant for his entire professional career?

Shameful statement.

You have to dig a little deeper. He knew all these Covid masks were theatre and the social distancing. The children who were harmed not going to school and the anxiety that remains. Jen Garner’s daughter still walks around in a mask.

Anonymous wrote:Guys, it’s 2025…let’s stop worrying about Fauci and instead brace ourselves for what comes next:

Trump has surrounded himself with self-interested corporate advisors and wacky celebs.

What kind of good counsel will they provide Trump?

Buckle up!

ICYMI: Joe Rogan and Mark Zuckerberg were prominently seated in the church service this morning.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After all these sleazy pardons, Dems are going to have to lie even more than usual to try to maintain the moral highground.

what is sleazy about protecting a doctor who has been a public servant for his entire professional career?

Shameful statement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Weird how none of the MAGAs complained when Trump pardoned his political allies.

Give us one example of Trump pardoning someone who had not already done their time.

Name one person he pardoned preemptively.

Anonymous wrote:Guys, it’s 2025…let’s stop worrying about Fauci and instead brace ourselves for what comes next:

Trump has surrounded himself with self-interested corporate advisors and wacky celebs.

What kind of good counsel will they provide Trump?

Buckle up!

ICYMI: Joe Rogan and Mark Zuckerberg were prominently seated in the church service this morning.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:good point. The dumb thing is these pardons may not be constitutionally valid and the sheer number could force this issue.

Huh? Exactly how might they not be "constitutionally valid"?

Where does the constitution say you can pardon someone who hasn’t even been convicted? Just because it’s been done before doesn’t mean it has withstood a court challenge.

Pardons are for leniency and a statement against what the executive thinks was an unfair trial or conviction. Not for protecting political allies from investigation or trial in the first place.

See you in court.

“The Constitution provides that the President "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offences against the United States, except in cases of impeachment." [Footnote 6]
The power thus conferred is unlimited, with the exception stated. It extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency or after conviction and judgment.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Weird how none of the MAGAs complained when Trump pardoned his political allies.

Give us one example of Trump pardoning someone who had not already done their time.

Name one person he pardoned preemptively.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:good point. The dumb thing is these pardons may not be constitutionally valid and the sheer number could force this issue.

Huh? Exactly how might they not be "constitutionally valid"?

Where does the constitution say you can pardon someone who hasn’t even been convicted? Just because it’s been done before doesn’t mean it has withstood a court challenge.

Pardons are for leniency and a statement against what the executive thinks was an unfair trial or conviction. Not for protecting political allies from investigation or trial in the first place.

See you in court.

didn’t trump consider pardoning himself? 🤔

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Weird how none of the MAGAs complained when Trump pardoned his political allies.

Give us one example of Trump pardoning someone who had not already done their time.

Name one person he pardoned preemptively.

Anonymous wrote:This is so sad to me. Fauci was a medical professional trying to help with a world wide public healthcare crisis with a completely unknown virus. That’s not the kind of person who should need a pardon. It’s such a sad commentary on the madness of the world under Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sets a very bad precedent. Sad.

Trump can do whatever he wants now and just preemptively pardon his minions as he goes.

He was going to do that anyway.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sets a very bad precedent. Sad.

Trump can do whatever he wants now and just preemptively pardon his minions as he goes.

He was going to do that anyway.

Trump pardoned his minions last time. Of course he’s going to do it again. Biden is just following the precedent Trump set.

Anonymous wrote:Weird how none of the MAGAs complained when Trump pardoned his political allies.