Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still no solution to address the fact that agencies do not have space for all of their employees. Many agencies gave up leased private office space and transitioned their employees to new space with limited time in the office. They cannot fit all of their employees in their offices at one time. The whole model is based on the idea that some employees work remotely.
You’re presuming that employees all deserve offices. I’m sure they’d be happy for you to be sharing offices and sitting on chairs in hallways.
Nope; but I am presuming that everyone gets a desk. My agency does not have enough space for every employee to be sitting at the office at the same time.
I worked for a local gov once that had 6 attorneys in a conference room with a couple sharing two sides of a desk. Don’t underestimate how bad conditions can be!
Our agency already has two feds sharing a cubicle, which is one reason we telework!
+1, lots of feds already share offices, have workstations in hallways, require contractors to be remote to save space. We're talking about exceeding the legal capacity of the building if everyone is in every day.
If this passes just call the fire marshall each day to report violations.
Anonymous wrote:If this was actually about money, this is what I think would be reasonable…
Remote? RUS. There will be some attrition from those in more competitive high CoL areas, but those in medium COL areas will probably deal with it. For reference, if you’re on a GI Bill and fully remote, the BAH payout is much lower if you’re in a high CoL area.
Telework? Prorated between locality and RUS based on number of days you go in. If you only need to go in once a week, you could, in theory, live further out in the exurbs. Plus there are increased commuting expenses based on how much you need to go in.
Anonymous wrote:If this was actually about money, this is what I think would be reasonable…
Remote? RUS. There will be some attrition from those in more competitive high CoL areas, but those in medium COL areas will probably deal with it. For reference, if you’re on a GI Bill and fully remote, the BAH payout is much lower if you’re in a high CoL area.
Telework? Prorated between locality and RUS based on number of days you go in. If you only need to go in once a week, you could, in theory, live further out in the exurbs.Plus there are increased commuting expenses based on how much you need to go in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL!!! Right because someone that teleworks ONCE per week is doing so from Texas.
We all know that people who telework one day a week are using it for target runs, doctor’s appointments and laundry.
I'm fully remote now but when I was at one day a week I used my home days for my most complicated writing because no one would be coming in to interrupt me. In office someone was always coming by with questions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still no solution to address the fact that agencies do not have space for all of their employees. Many agencies gave up leased private office space and transitioned their employees to new space with limited time in the office. They cannot fit all of their employees in their offices at one time. The whole model is based on the idea that some employees work remotely.
You’re presuming that employees all deserve offices. I’m sure they’d be happy for you to be sharing offices and sitting on chairs in hallways.
Nope; but I am presuming that everyone gets a desk. My agency does not have enough space for every employee to be sitting at the office at the same time.
I worked for a local gov once that had 6 attorneys in a conference room with a couple sharing two sides of a desk. Don’t underestimate how bad conditions can be!
Our agency already has two feds sharing a cubicle, which is one reason we telework!
+1, lots of feds already share offices, have workstations in hallways, require contractors to be remote to save space. We're talking about exceeding the legal capacity of the building if everyone is in every day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So were this to pass the agencies would just increase the number of fully remote workers, I'm assuming. The agency higher ups don’t want to have to rent more office space.
Who do you think will be the most "high up" at these agencies?
Anonymous wrote:So were this to pass the agencies would just increase the number of fully remote workers, I'm assuming. The agency higher ups don’t want to have to rent more office space.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still no solution to address the fact that agencies do not have space for all of their employees. Many agencies gave up leased private office space and transitioned their employees to new space with limited time in the office. They cannot fit all of their employees in their offices at one time. The whole model is based on the idea that some employees work remotely.
You’re presuming that employees all deserve offices. I’m sure they’d be happy for you to be sharing offices and sitting on chairs in hallways.
Nope; but I am presuming that everyone gets a desk. My agency does not have enough space for every employee to be sitting at the office at the same time.
I worked for a local gov once that had 6 attorneys in a conference room with a couple sharing two sides of a desk. Don’t underestimate how bad conditions can be!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m just tired of being hated on. Like so insulted. members get served by Feds in so many ways they don’t even know yet they all are lt hate us all.
Same. We were told that the administration would want to "move fast" when they come in in a couple weeks. Moving fast means hard work and long hours. They want to do that while making life miserable for us and berating us. It's just not going to happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still no solution to address the fact that agencies do not have space for all of their employees. Many agencies gave up leased private office space and transitioned their employees to new space with limited time in the office. They cannot fit all of their employees in their offices at one time. The whole model is based on the idea that some employees work remotely.
You’re presuming that employees all deserve offices. I’m sure they’d be happy for you to be sharing offices and sitting on chairs in hallways.
Nope; but I am presuming that everyone gets a desk. My agency does not have enough space for every employee to be sitting at the office at the same time.
I worked for a local gov once that had 6 attorneys in a conference room with a couple sharing two sides of a desk. Don’t underestimate how bad conditions can be!
Our agency already has two feds sharing a cubicle, which is one reason we telework!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still no solution to address the fact that agencies do not have space for all of their employees. Many agencies gave up leased private office space and transitioned their employees to new space with limited time in the office. They cannot fit all of their employees in their offices at one time. The whole model is based on the idea that some employees work remotely.
You’re presuming that employees all deserve offices. I’m sure they’d be happy for you to be sharing offices and sitting on chairs in hallways.
Nope; but I am presuming that everyone gets a desk. My agency does not have enough space for every employee to be sitting at the office at the same time.
I worked for a local gov once that had 6 attorneys in a conference room with a couple sharing two sides of a desk. Don’t underestimate how bad conditions can be!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still no solution to address the fact that agencies do not have space for all of their employees. Many agencies gave up leased private office space and transitioned their employees to new space with limited time in the office. They cannot fit all of their employees in their offices at one time. The whole model is based on the idea that some employees work remotely.
You’re presuming that employees all deserve offices. I’m sure they’d be happy for you to be sharing offices and sitting on chairs in hallways.
Nope; but I am presuming that everyone gets a desk. My agency does not have enough space for every employee to be sitting at the office at the same time.
I worked for a local gov once that had 6 attorneys in a conference room with a couple sharing two sides of a desk. Don’t underestimate how bad conditions can be!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still no solution to address the fact that agencies do not have space for all of their employees. Many agencies gave up leased private office space and transitioned their employees to new space with limited time in the office. They cannot fit all of their employees in their offices at one time. The whole model is based on the idea that some employees work remotely.
You’re presuming that employees all deserve offices. I’m sure they’d be happy for you to be sharing offices and sitting on chairs in hallways.
Nope; but I am presuming that everyone gets a desk. My agency does not have enough space for every employee to be sitting at the office at the same time.