Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm curious what motivates most applicants. Are there advantages? Or do you typically have a family reason?
DD is a couple years out, but we are considering a within-US move for in-state residency purposes and wondering what else to consider.
1. [url]Less expensive (even with the flights back and forth)[b]
2. We have family in the other country our kids applied to
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tuition is less expensive.
Not anymore. I have a kid at Oxford. Tuition (only) is now $37,389 to $62,820 (STEM) pounds sterling = $80,000. Add in their estimated living costs of $14k - $20k and you are easily at $100k for 2025-2026. And Oxford doesn’t have great financial aid or merit like the US universities do to bring that number down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't want to hijack the thread - What is the admission's process for Oxbridge?
Is it just scheduling that test and then submit your grades/SAT/AP Scores? They seem to write a lot on their site and feel like I missed some small print some where.
I've been through it and think it's tough. First look at the minimums. Then assess whether you can get 5s in 5 APs. If you get an offer, it most likely will be "conditional" based upon that and upon posting proof of financial responsibility with your particular college. Unlike American colleges you must provide proof of financial means before acceptance -at least our kid did. Then there are the famous 3 on one interviews during which the student must prove sufficient mastery of the subject in which they propose to read. Most Americans can't do this. Remember you are proposing to read and write in one subject. It is not the American "take lots of classes in anything" approach. Entire books have been written on how to ace those interviews. I own several of them. Most Americans hire a tutor months before those interviews.
+1. The interviews are what Americans are not prepared for. We found the process daunting so hired a college counselor with overseas expertise.
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious what motivates most applicants. Are there advantages? Or do you typically have a family reason?
DD is a couple years out, but we are considering a within-US move for in-state residency purposes and wondering what else to consider.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't want to hijack the thread - What is the admission's process for Oxbridge?
Is it just scheduling that test and then submit your grades/SAT/AP Scores? They seem to write a lot on their site and feel like I missed some small print some where.
I've been through it and think it's tough. First look at the minimums. Then assess whether you can get 5s in 5 APs. If you get an offer, it most likely will be "conditional" based upon that and upon posting proof of financial responsibility with your particular college. Unlike American colleges you must provide proof of financial means before acceptance -at least our kid did. Then there are the famous 3 on one interviews during which the student must prove sufficient mastery of the subject in which they propose to read. Most Americans can't do this. Remember you are proposing to read and write in one subject. It is not the American "take lots of classes in anything" approach. Entire books have been written on how to ace those interviews. I own several of them. Most Americans hire a tutor months before those interviews.
Anonymous wrote:Tuition is less expensive.
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious what motivates most applicants. Are there advantages? Or do you typically have a family reason?
DD is a couple years out, but we are considering a within-US move for in-state residency purposes and wondering what else to consider.
Anonymous wrote:Don't want to hijack the thread - What is the admission's process for Oxbridge?
Is it just scheduling that test and then submit your grades/SAT/AP Scores? They seem to write a lot on their site and feel like I missed some small print some where.
Anonymous wrote:Our US tours focused heavily on social factors that DS didn’t care about. His Cambridge tour was perfect and convinced him that it was the academic space he craved. He’s now graduated and it was worth every penny!
Anonymous wrote:Nope, I was right:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought 4 years just gets you a BSc. Hons.Anonymous wrote:It's wild that you can have an undergrad and a taught masters in the total of four years in the UK compared to six years here. Ton of savings!
In the UK it's 3 yrs for a BA or a BSc. You can get an MSci in 4 yrs with integrated programs as well as separate 1 yr MA/ Msci offerings. My DD is going to do that this coming Fall. She will arrive as a 17 yr old and have her Msci while 21 and go straight into an PhD for 3 further years (fingers crossed).
https://www.bradford.ac.uk/courses/ug/computer-science-bsc/[/quote
Don't listen to this person. Bradford is a poorly ranked public university that started as a vocational school. It's ranked 331 out of 360 in QS world rankings.
Oxford's taught and research masters are both two years. My DD just finished one and is now finishing her DPhil.