Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, listen to yourself. You started this by saying there's no acrimony. But you also seem to think you need to give up a lot of money to maintain a good relationship with him! How is that not acrimony?
You say he's a good dad, but you also seem to think you need to "support" his desire to see the kids by driving them over to him. Why can't he do any of the driving, if he's such a good dad and wants to see them so badly? If he were really a good parent would he need you to spend your time and energy supporting his parent-child relationship? Is he spending his time and energy supporting *your* parent-child relationship? I doubt it.
I guess I mean there's no acrimony because I work hard to makes sure there's no acrimony. I'm not acrimonious. I feel sorry for him and sorry for my kids. I don't hate him. I don't want this to get contentious. I'm not out to take him to the cleaners or anything like this. I just want my kids to have a dad.
Well, I think that is not "no acrimony". And it means that twice-a-day handoffs are not necessarily what's best for you and your kids. Kids can sense the tension. You, them, and him might be a lot happier with less frequent switching. Good boundaries make good neighbors, and less contact can really lower the temperature. Both-parents-every-day only works if you have a really good co-parent relationship, and it sounds like you actually don't, despite your efforts and capitulations.
Why does he only want them for Saturday mornings?
I said I would be really upset not having nights with them and he said well maybe more weekend time for you would even it out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, listen to yourself. You started this by saying there's no acrimony. But you also seem to think you need to give up a lot of money to maintain a good relationship with him! How is that not acrimony?
You say he's a good dad, but you also seem to think you need to "support" his desire to see the kids by driving them over to him. Why can't he do any of the driving, if he's such a good dad and wants to see them so badly? If he were really a good parent would he need you to spend your time and energy supporting his parent-child relationship? Is he spending his time and energy supporting *your* parent-child relationship? I doubt it.
I guess I mean there's no acrimony because I work hard to makes sure there's no acrimony. I'm not acrimonious. I feel sorry for him and sorry for my kids. I don't hate him. I don't want this to get contentious. I'm not out to take him to the cleaners or anything like this. I just want my kids to have a dad.
Well, I think that is not "no acrimony". And it means that twice-a-day handoffs are not necessarily what's best for you and your kids. Kids can sense the tension. You, them, and him might be a lot happier with less frequent switching. Good boundaries make good neighbors, and less contact can really lower the temperature. Both-parents-every-day only works if you have a really good co-parent relationship, and it sounds like you actually don't, despite your efforts and capitulations.
Why does he only want them for Saturday mornings?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, listen to yourself. You started this by saying there's no acrimony. But you also seem to think you need to give up a lot of money to maintain a good relationship with him! How is that not acrimony?
You say he's a good dad, but you also seem to think you need to "support" his desire to see the kids by driving them over to him. Why can't he do any of the driving, if he's such a good dad and wants to see them so badly? If he were really a good parent would he need you to spend your time and energy supporting his parent-child relationship? Is he spending his time and energy supporting *your* parent-child relationship? I doubt it.
I guess I mean there's no acrimony because I work hard to makes sure there's no acrimony. I'm not acrimonious. I feel sorry for him and sorry for my kids. I don't hate him. I don't want this to get contentious. I'm not out to take him to the cleaners or anything like this. I just want my kids to have a dad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, listen to yourself. You started this by saying there's no acrimony. But you also seem to think you need to give up a lot of money to maintain a good relationship with him! How is that not acrimony?
You say he's a good dad, but you also seem to think you need to "support" his desire to see the kids by driving them over to him. Why can't he do any of the driving, if he's such a good dad and wants to see them so badly? If he were really a good parent would he need you to spend your time and energy supporting his parent-child relationship? Is he spending his time and energy supporting *your* parent-child relationship? I doubt it.
I guess I mean there's no acrimony because I work hard to makes sure there's no acrimony. I'm not acrimonious. I feel sorry for him and sorry for my kids. I don't hate him. I don't want this to get contentious. I'm not out to take him to the cleaners or anything like this. I just want my kids to have a dad.
You said earlier he's a good dad. Seems like you're not so sure?
You can't buy them a dad by giving up assets. Many have tried and it's a losing game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He makes $2 mil/year?
For the love of G-d get a lawyer OP.
Get half the assets and get alimony and CS.
Guarantee he’ll remarry and could easily adopt the new woman’s kids. Get what you and your kids are owed. Your lifestyle is about to take. A huge hit.
I don't know why people think I don't have a lawyer. I spent the weekend emailing lawyers. I don't care about my lifestyle. I'm not someone who cares about that stuff. My question was specifically about seeing both parents every day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, listen to yourself. You started this by saying there's no acrimony. But you also seem to think you need to give up a lot of money to maintain a good relationship with him! How is that not acrimony?
You say he's a good dad, but you also seem to think you need to "support" his desire to see the kids by driving them over to him. Why can't he do any of the driving, if he's such a good dad and wants to see them so badly? If he were really a good parent would he need you to spend your time and energy supporting his parent-child relationship? Is he spending his time and energy supporting *your* parent-child relationship? I doubt it.
I guess I mean there's no acrimony because I work hard to makes sure there's no acrimony. I'm not acrimonious. I feel sorry for him and sorry for my kids. I don't hate him. I don't want this to get contentious. I'm not out to take him to the cleaners or anything like this. I just want my kids to have a dad.
Anonymous wrote:OP, listen to yourself. You started this by saying there's no acrimony. But you also seem to think you need to give up a lot of money to maintain a good relationship with him! How is that not acrimony?
You say he's a good dad, but you also seem to think you need to "support" his desire to see the kids by driving them over to him. Why can't he do any of the driving, if he's such a good dad and wants to see them so badly? If he were really a good parent would he need you to spend your time and energy supporting his parent-child relationship? Is he spending his time and energy supporting *your* parent-child relationship? I doubt it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He makes $2 mil/year?
For the love of G-d get a lawyer OP.
Get half the assets and get alimony and CS.
Guarantee he’ll remarry and could easily adopt the new woman’s kids. Get what you and your kids are owed. Your lifestyle is about to take. A huge hit.
I don't know why people think I don't have a lawyer. I spent the weekend emailing lawyers. I don't care about my lifestyle. I'm not someone who cares about that stuff. My question was specifically about seeing both parents every day.
Anonymous wrote:He makes $2 mil/year?
For the love of G-d get a lawyer OP.
Get half the assets and get alimony and CS.
Guarantee he’ll remarry and could easily adopt the new woman’s kids. Get what you and your kids are owed. Your lifestyle is about to take. A huge hit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think wanting to see the kids every day can be a way of staying enmeshed with the ex. You're going to have way more interaction and communication with him because of it. He's basically got you as his driving nanny, he's got you spending lots and lots of time on logistics and catering to his schedule.
If he wanted time with them that badly he wouldn't be leaving you.
He really is basically proposing that she be his unpaid nanny. Kind of wild. I was supportive at first of OP trying this, but with more details, I think it’s really off. She needs to get her fair share of assets, get the kids 5 days/week then HE can come by and see them after he’s off work if he wants. F the idea that she’s going to do school pick up, drop off, after school care THEN drive them back to his house!
Anonymous wrote:I think wanting to see the kids every day can be a way of staying enmeshed with the ex. You're going to have way more interaction and communication with him because of it. He's basically got you as his driving nanny, he's got you spending lots and lots of time on logistics and catering to his schedule.
If he wanted time with them that badly he wouldn't be leaving you.