Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that no one has focused on OPS language: “I couldn’t have been clearer and he agreed.” Note that she doesn’t say “and he said he wanted them too.“
Not so sure he “changed his mind.”
Who gives a shit? She’s 31 and can still have kids elsewhere!!! Run OP!!
I am not saying she should or shouldn’t. What I am saying is that it’s not necessarily fair to blame the guy. It sounds like OP went into the marriage with a lot of wishful thinking.
Who cares about blame. She is on the tail end of fertility and he is playing games and wasting her time.
But because she's on the tail end of fertility, she needs to accept the real possibility that she won't have a child if she leaves him either.
Huh? 31 is not the tail end of fertility. She has plenty of time, and suggesting she stay and actively have children with someone who specifically said they didn't want them is NOT a good plan.
1 year divorce, 3 years to find someone, 1 year to get married, 2 years of marriage before having kids.
That's 37 years. Kids at 38 years old is how you end up with kids with ASD or Downs.
Dp
That’s not an unreasonable timeline. 3 years would be finding and dating someone to determine whether they are capable of being a good father and husband.
Anonymous wrote:My friend was married to a guy who told her he didn’t want kids. So she didn’t have any. Ffwd to 8 years in, he divorced her and had 2 kids with the new wife.
Anonymous wrote:31? You're out of time. You're not likely to find someone else in the next 4 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: But because she's on the tail end of fertility, she needs to accept the real possibility that she won't have a child if she leaves him either.
It is selfish to even consider knowingly bringing a child into a family where the father does not want them.
I didn't say she should. She'll may need to decide between keeping her current partner and being alone forever.
What’s preventing her from finding a new partner? She may not be able to become pregnant but that’s another matter.
There's no guarantee she'll find someone knew or have a child.
That’s life. There are few guarantees. There is nothing to prevent OP from trying.
That's right. She could try, but things could end up worse.
Worse how?
What might happen that won’t happen if she remains in her present situation? She might not find a partner that wants a child? That’s her present situation.
Define worse.
She could end up alone.
Anonymous wrote:Break up. At your age and with no kids yet - you have time to meet someone new and start afresh. This would be a deal breaker to me no question. If you really want to be a parent, it's a desire and fulfillment that trumps all else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: But because she's on the tail end of fertility, she needs to accept the real possibility that she won't have a child if she leaves him either.
It is selfish to even consider knowingly bringing a child into a family where the father does not want them.
I didn't say she should. She'll may need to decide between keeping her current partner and being alone forever.
What’s preventing her from finding a new partner? She may not be able to become pregnant but that’s another matter.
There's no guarantee she'll find someone knew or have a child.
That’s life. There are few guarantees. There is nothing to prevent OP from trying.
That's right. She could try, but things could end up worse.
Worse how?
What might happen that won’t happen if she remains in her present situation? She might not find a partner that wants a child? That’s her present situation.
Define worse.
She could end up alone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you were dating though, was his stance “Sure kids will work?” That’s very different than “I’ve always wanted a family, I can’t wait to start one with you?”
Give me a freaking break. So now it’s on women to vet the degree to which a man’s yes to kids actually means yes? Look. If he doesn’t want kids, fine. But that’s on him to say so and prevent it via the many, many forms of birth control available. Not give a tepid yes that he doesn’t really mean to the kids question and then shrug and give this woman a choice between a marriage with no kids and divorce. That should seriously be a jailable offense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: But because she's on the tail end of fertility, she needs to accept the real possibility that she won't have a child if she leaves him either.
It is selfish to even consider knowingly bringing a child into a family where the father does not want them.
I didn't say she should. She'll may need to decide between keeping her current partner and being alone forever.
What’s preventing her from finding a new partner? She may not be able to become pregnant but that’s another matter.
There's no guarantee she'll find someone knew or have a child.
That’s life. There are few guarantees. There is nothing to prevent OP from trying.
That's right. She could try, but things could end up worse.
Worse how?
What might happen that won’t happen if she remains in her present situation? She might not find a partner that wants a child? That’s her present situation.
Define worse.
She could end up alone.
That's better than being with a liar and reluctant dad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is news to me, as we talked about it 100x during our engagement and I couldn't have been clearer with my plans and he agreed.
Do I break up with him, accept a shitty father (basically he said he will have kids but isn't invested), or accept no family for the rest of my life?
I am 31, only married for eight months, and already devastated. Has anyone else been through this?
The climate emergency we are experiencing as a planet means your husban is right and you are wrong, OP. The world does not revolve around you, you know.
Anonymous wrote:Devil’s advocate: why not have a kid, since he is willing, and see how it goes?
He might do a 180 and fall in love when the kid is born. I did that (as a woman). I was ambivalent before and planned one mostly because due to social convention.
Or if he’s terrible, well at least you’ll get custody and some spousal support, which is better than doing it alone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that no one has focused on OPS language: “I couldn’t have been clearer and he agreed.” Note that she doesn’t say “and he said he wanted them too.“
Not so sure he “changed his mind.”
Who gives a shit? She’s 31 and can still have kids elsewhere!!! Run OP!!
I am not saying she should or shouldn’t. What I am saying is that it’s not necessarily fair to blame the guy. It sounds like OP went into the marriage with a lot of wishful thinking.
Who cares about blame. She is on the tail end of fertility and he is playing games and wasting her time.
But because she's on the tail end of fertility, she needs to accept the real possibility that she won't have a child if she leaves him either.
Huh? 31 is not the tail end of fertility. She has plenty of time, and suggesting she stay and actively have children with someone who specifically said they didn't want them is NOT a good plan.
1 year divorce, 3 years to find someone, 1 year to get married, 2 years of marriage before having kids.
That's 37 years. Kids at 38 years old is how you end up with kids with ASD or Downs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: But because she's on the tail end of fertility, she needs to accept the real possibility that she won't have a child if she leaves him either.
It is selfish to even consider knowingly bringing a child into a family where the father does not want them.
I didn't say she should. She'll may need to decide between keeping her current partner and being alone forever.
What’s preventing her from finding a new partner? She may not be able to become pregnant but that’s another matter.
There's no guarantee she'll find someone knew or have a child.
That’s life. There are few guarantees. There is nothing to prevent OP from trying.
That's right. She could try, but things could end up worse.
Worse how?
What might happen that won’t happen if she remains in her present situation? She might not find a partner that wants a child? That’s her present situation.
Define worse.
She could end up alone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: But because she's on the tail end of fertility, she needs to accept the real possibility that she won't have a child if she leaves him either.
It is selfish to even consider knowingly bringing a child into a family where the father does not want them.
I didn't say she should. She'll may need to decide between keeping her current partner and being alone forever.
What’s preventing her from finding a new partner? She may not be able to become pregnant but that’s another matter.
There's no guarantee she'll find someone knew or have a child.
That’s life. There are few guarantees. There is nothing to prevent OP from trying.
That's right. She could try, but things could end up worse.
Worse how?
What might happen that won’t happen if she remains in her present situation? She might not find a partner that wants a child? That’s her present situation.
Define worse.