Anonymous wrote:She was horrific. Republican’s who are open minded enough to admit that Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were good candidates think Kamala is a laughingstock she was so bad on so many levels.
Middle of the road Democrats acknowledge how terrible she was. I saw an interview recently with a big money Dem donor named Morgan who was venting about her and felt totally ripped off, and said he will never again be an ATM for the likes of her.
She is a fraud
The only people who would say she is good at this point are the hard left wing of the Dem party, and Trump haters who can’t differentiate those feelings from support for whomever is running against Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Success has many parents, failure is an orphan. She wasn't a bad candidate, I'd dare to say, no worse than Biden or even Obama. Certainly far better than Trump. She has a lot more experience as a senator than Obama did. Far better qualified for sure than many men who run for the office.
IMO her failure was somewhat not her fault because Biden run again and that set her up for having to jump in in the last moment. But biggest problem is money in politics. Everyone gets into it for grift. Grift is first, winning is the second objective. Her objective was winning, I'm sure, but having short time to manage her campaign lots of grifters took advantage and now they are looking for someone to blame so they can get to grift again next time.
That's not to say grift is only on Dem side, it's far worse on the right and they aren't even bothering to hide it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day she only lost by
Less than 400,000 votes (different in the blue wall states.)
The news media is making it seems like she lost like Carter, mccain, Romney or even Trump lost in 2020.
People just didn’t turn out but not a lot has to change.
At the end of the day she lost.
Good candidates don’t win elections.
Dukakis in the tank. Gore with his earth tones. Kerry windsurfing. Harris with her “nothing comes to mind”. All of these moments encapsulating why none of those out of touch people deserved to be President.
The person who doesn’t deserve to be President is the one who had a tantrum over losing the last time.
Anonymous wrote:She lost because of inflation and immigration. It's that simple. She was fine, but people want change. They.will get it but may not be happy with their choice in 4 years. This is how politics goes.
Anonymous wrote:She's a DEI candidate. That's why everybody thought she was so bad. Our country has moved on from people getting positions because they check boxes and have no merit.
Kamala Harris is also for They/Them. Trump is for you.
Just like Elizabeth Warren had no chance of winning because she lied about being Naive American. Our country has moved on from liars in politics.
Andrew Yang had no chance because he is 5'7".
Our country wants a tall 6'3, honest leader who made it there based on merit who is for the people not niche issues.
Anonymous wrote:Success has many parents, failure is an orphan. She wasn't a bad candidate, I'd dare to say, no worse than Biden or even Obama. Certainly far better than Trump. She has a lot more experience as a senator than Obama did. Far better qualified for sure than many men who run for the office.
IMO her failure was somewhat not her fault because Biden run again and that set her up for having to jump in in the last moment. But biggest problem is money in politics. Everyone gets into it for grift. Grift is first, winning is the second objective. Her objective was winning, I'm sure, but having short time to manage her campaign lots of grifters took advantage and now they are looking for someone to blame so they can get to grift again next time.
That's not to say grift is only on Dem side, it's far worse on the right and they aren't even bothering to hide it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because she is a POC women and Americans won’t vote for that - no matter how much more qualified they are than the alternated facts DEI candidate that was elected
I love Winsome Sears and want to see her move up in national politics, but I didn’t vote for a sort of blackish / indianish woman because I hate POCs? Got it. Keep doubling down on that mentality PLEASE.
The day the DNC can find a WOC like Kemi Badenoch, she will win the election. No more rewards for SAHMs whose husband cheated on them or as a sop to the BLM or any "interest" group.
Kemi is conservative and right wing so doubtful anyone on the looney left would be the same
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.
Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.
But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.
A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.
She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.
I agree with everything you said here. But the question is, why did she need to say what she would have done differently during Biden's four years, while Trump never needed to say what he would have done differently during his own four years? He has literally given himself 10 out of 10 for some of his weakest moments (his response to the hurricane in Puerto Rico, COVID) and he continues to insist that the J6 rioters were true American patriots. There was a real double standard at work.
I don’t even understand what your concern is. She had a near limitless money pot and lost. One candidate can never run the other’s campaign. Katie Porter can’t be countered with a whiteboarding wonk. You can’t out RN or MPH a Lauren Underwood. You can’t out-hoodie Fetterman.
I’m also a middle-aged comfortable woman who is all in for Democrats only and you, my “kind” confuse me. Are you determined to be a baby forever? There is no double-standard in terms of how a candidate deals: they just keep moving, altering messaging, and closing any gaps where they keep finding they lack voters and support. Dassit and that’s what’s always been it.
So what is your actual observation? Because all it really is at heart is a bunch of mewling. I don’t feel sorry for you or her or any other befuddled crybaby at this point. She failed. She failed! She did not GOTV. She made some poor strategic choices. I feel sorry for my DC and the worst off of us. I don’t feel sorry for this woman. She wanted the brass ring and failed to get it and the polling told her this was gonna happen and she and the staffers who weren’t laid off all knew it and still begged ordinary people for donations. No. Nope. I’m done with feeling sorry for them forever.
Donald had Elon Musk's money.
….and? Can you remind me when it didn’t seem X was providing contributions in kind to Trump? Money in politics is something everyone rolls around like a pig in sh!t excepting Sanders. She didn’t lose because of lack of money.
Keep filling that diaper. What are we even talking about? She lost. She failed. She was tonally off to too many voters who stayed home. Wanna keep crybabying buh buh buh people hurt me and voted at me and I was told I had to send $25 so I did and not fair and Joe needs to resign!
Babies. Babies all the way down. The party elders sh!t themselves just like Trump. And people like you want to whine buhhhbuhhhh Truuump forever. Does that win? She shat the bed and the shift to red is the problem. So let’s fix it. Or we can do your approach.