Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1600 stands alone …
1590 and below, the test identified your limit. A perfect 1600 in a one-and-done scenario? There’s no effective way to nail down that individual’s capacity or limit. The test doesn’t allow for a complete measurement of their actual potential.
Also an institution is going to take the 1600 because the GPAs, ACT and and SAT scores are all reported to the ranking services and then ultimately to the alumni. So the poster saying there is no difference is just wrong. Every college wants to move up the USNWR rankings. The way to do that is to accept kids with the highest GPA, SAT and AcT scores possible
This was true in the past but it's not as true today because US News doesn't care that much about SAT/ACT. It's only 5% of the ranking and only if you have 50%+ students reporting their scores. SAT/ACT is not used at all for your rank if you have <50% reporting. A school that really wants to move up the US News ranking might focus on other factors. For example, Pell grant is 5%, same as SAT/ACT.
Completely and 100% false. Prove your assertions with actual cites. (that's ok, we know you can't).
Anonymous wrote:1600 stands alone …
1590 and below, the test identified your limit. A perfect 1600 in a one-and-done scenario? There’s no effective way to nail down that individual’s capacity or limit. The test doesn’t allow for a complete measurement of their actual potential.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1600 stands alone …
1590 and below, the test identified your limit. A perfect 1600 in a one-and-done scenario? There’s no effective way to nail down that individual’s capacity or limit. The test doesn’t allow for a complete measurement of their actual potential.
Also an institution is going to take the 1600 because the GPAs, ACT and and SAT scores are all reported to the ranking services and then ultimately to the alumni. So the poster saying there is no difference is just wrong. Every college wants to move up the USNWR rankings. The way to do that is to accept kids with the highest GPA, SAT and AcT scores possible
This was true in the past but it's not as true today because US News doesn't care that much about SAT/ACT. It's only 5% of the ranking and only if you have 50%+ students reporting their scores. SAT/ACT is not used at all for your rank if you have <50% reporting. A school that really wants to move up the US News ranking might focus on other factors. For example, Pell grant is 5%, same as SAT/ACT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1600 stands alone …
1590 and below, the test identified your limit. A perfect 1600 in a one-and-done scenario? There’s no effective way to nail down that individual’s capacity or limit. The test doesn’t allow for a complete measurement of their actual potential.
Also an institution is going to take the 1600 because the GPAs, ACT and and SAT scores are all reported to the ranking services and then ultimately to the alumni. So the poster saying there is no difference is just wrong. Every college wants to move up the USNWR rankings. The way to do that is to accept kids with the highest GPA, SAT and AcT scores possible
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1600 stands alone …
1590 and below, the test identified your limit. A perfect 1600 in a one-and-done scenario? There’s no effective way to nail down that individual’s capacity or limit. The test doesn’t allow for a complete measurement of their actual potential.
Also an institution is going to take the 1600 because the GPAs, ACT and and SAT scores are all reported to the ranking services and then ultimately to the alumni. So the poster saying there is no difference is just wrong. Every college wants to move up the USNWR rankings. The way to do that is to accept kids with the highest GPA, SAT and AcT scores possible
This was true in the past but it's not as true today because US News doesn't care that much about SAT/ACT. It's only 5% of the ranking and only if you have 50%+ students reporting their scores. SAT/ACT is not used at all for your rank if you have <50% reporting. A school that really wants to move up the US News ranking might focus on other factors. For example, Pell grant is 5%, same as SAT/ACT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1600 stands alone …
1590 and below, the test identified your limit. A perfect 1600 in a one-and-done scenario? There’s no effective way to nail down that individual’s capacity or limit. The test doesn’t allow for a complete measurement of their actual potential.
Also an institution is going to take the 1600 because the GPAs, ACT and and SAT scores are all reported to the ranking services and then ultimately to the alumni. So the poster saying there is no difference is just wrong. Every college wants to move up the USNWR rankings. The way to do that is to accept kids with the highest GPA, SAT and AcT scores possible
Anonymous wrote:1600 stands alone …
1590 and below, the test identified your limit. A perfect 1600 in a one-and-done scenario? There’s no effective way to nail down that individual’s capacity or limit. The test doesn’t allow for a complete measurement of their actual potential.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Based on the College Board data, at least from 2018, about 125,000 students took 10 AP's or more.
This lends credence to the thesis that you need that many to be "in the door" to Top 20's.
Check the 2018 data again …
1. Barely 90,000 with 10 or more.
2. Posters in this thread have consistently referenced “15 or more” AP tests anyway, which brings the 2018 number below 3,000.
3. Posters have also indicated other conditions like (A) a wall of 5s only on 15 or more AP tests, with no scores below 5, (B) a 4.0 unweighted GPA, and (C) a perfect, one-and-done standardized test score …
Of the 3,000 or fewer who met the “15 or more” APs in 2018, fewer than 300 per year met all three add’l conditions.
Adjusting for 2024 data, that number is 500 or fewer per year.
For the last time:
1550 IS NOT the same as a 1600.
A superscored or multi-attempt 1600 IS NOT the same as a one-and-done 1600.
When taking 15 AP tests, 12x 5, 2x 4, and 1x 3 IS NOT the same as 15x 5.
And a 3.96 IS NOT the same as a 4.0.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Based on the College Board data, at least from 2018, about 125,000 students took 10 AP's or more.
This lends credence to the thesis that you need that many to be "in the door" to Top 20's.
Check the 2018 data again …
1. Barely 90,000 with 10 or more.
2. Posters in this thread have consistently referenced “15 or more” AP tests anyway, which brings the 2018 number below 3,000.
3. Posters have also indicated other conditions like (A) a wall of 5s only on 15 or more AP tests, with no scores below 5, (B) a 4.0 unweighted GPA, and (C) a perfect, one-and-done standardized test score …
Of the 3,000 or fewer who met the “15 or more” APs in 2018, fewer than 300 per year met all three add’l conditions.
Adjusting for 2024 data, that number is 500 or fewer per year.
For the last time:
1550 IS NOT the same as a 1600.
A superscored or multi-attempt 1600 IS NOT the same as a one-and-done 1600.
When taking 15 AP tests, 12x 5, 2x 4, and 1x 3 IS NOT the same as 15x 5.
And a 3.96 IS NOT the same as a 4.0.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More up to date numbers:
https://reports.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/number-of-ap-exams-per-student-2023.pdf
2023
40,410 students had taken 9 AP Exams, 26,806 had 10 exams,
17,622 had 11 exams,
11,338 had 12 exams,
6,905 had 13 exams,
4,272 had 14 exams,
2,402 had 15 exams,
1,341 had 16 exams,
727 had 17 exams,
419 had 18 exams,
200 had 19 exams,
103 had 20 exams,
58 had 21 exams,
27 had 22 exams,
14 had 23 exams,
9 had 24 exams,
3 had 25 exams,
1 had 26 exams,
2 had 27 exams,
1 had 28 exams,
1 had 29 exams, and
3 students had 30 exams or more
How did you get these? I didn't see them on the link you referenced.
It is in the written paragraph at the cited link.