Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they have no power.
I will just point and laugh. DOGE is a joke anyway.
DOGE or no DOGE they are coming for your jobs. And some of you will be unemployed. If anyone thinks this time around they will leave the federal workforce intact then you are not paying attention to their determination.
uh yeah ok. so scared.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
GAO just issues reports. They have no bite.
I'm not sure "DOGE" will either, but we'll see.
But that is the point. Only Congress can really fix things. We already have GAO looking into this stuff, so why duplicate efforts instead of expecting Congress to do their jobs and fix things? The DOGE itself is the epitome of inefficiency.
It really is pathetic. They are forming an agency that is not actually part of the government but calls itself that, to duplicate things that actual government agencies do. And it is headed not by one person but by two, because it is so efficient.
Will my taxpayer money pay for the Doge?
Yes, they’ll likely get some inflated fee from OMB for their “consulting” services.
i'm so shocked that the Trump administration would engage in grift.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
GAO just issues reports. They have no bite.
I'm not sure "DOGE" will either, but we'll see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
GAO just issues reports. They have no bite.
I'm not sure "DOGE" will either, but we'll see.
But that is the point. Only Congress can really fix things. We already have GAO looking into this stuff, so why duplicate efforts instead of expecting Congress to do their jobs and fix things? The DOGE itself is the epitome of inefficiency.
It really is pathetic. They are forming an agency that is not actually part of the government but calls itself that, to duplicate things that actual government agencies do. And it is headed not by one person but by two, because it is so efficient.
Will my taxpayer money pay for the Doge?
Yes, they’ll likely get some inflated fee from OMB for their “consulting” services.
i'm so shocked that the Trump administration would engage in grift.
It’s not a grift when Republicans do it. Don’t you know? Only things Dems do are bad.
A troll will be along in five minute with some inapt example of a thing Obama did that’s not even remotely similar. They’ll claim it was a very bad thing but also exactly the same as what Trump’s doing. They won’t explain why when Trump does it, it’s not bad, however.
Trump is a 78 yr old deranged lunatic. He could barely speak coherently when he was president 8 yrs ago. I can’t even imagine what reputable world leaders think during their conversations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
GAO just issues reports. They have no bite.
I'm not sure "DOGE" will either, but we'll see.
But that is the point. Only Congress can really fix things. We already have GAO looking into this stuff, so why duplicate efforts instead of expecting Congress to do their jobs and fix things? The DOGE itself is the epitome of inefficiency.
It really is pathetic. They are forming an agency that is not actually part of the government but calls itself that, to duplicate things that actual government agencies do. And it is headed not by one person but by two, because it is so efficient.
Will my taxpayer money pay for the Doge?
Yes, they’ll likely get some inflated fee from OMB for their “consulting” services.
i'm so shocked that the Trump administration would engage in grift.
It’s not a grift when Republicans do it. Don’t you know? Only things Dems do are bad.
A troll will be along in five minute with some inapt example of a thing Obama did that’s not even remotely similar. They’ll claim it was a very bad thing but also exactly the same as what Trump’s doing. They won’t explain why when Trump does it, it’s not bad, however.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
GAO just issues reports. They have no bite.
I'm not sure "DOGE" will either, but we'll see.
But that is the point. Only Congress can really fix things. We already have GAO looking into this stuff, so why duplicate efforts instead of expecting Congress to do their jobs and fix things? The DOGE itself is the epitome of inefficiency.
It really is pathetic. They are forming an agency that is not actually part of the government but calls itself that, to duplicate things that actual government agencies do. And it is headed not by one person but by two, because it is so efficient.
Will my taxpayer money pay for the Doge?
Yes, they’ll likely get some inflated fee from OMB for their “consulting” services.
i'm so shocked that the Trump administration would engage in grift.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
GAO just issues reports. They have no bite.
I'm not sure "DOGE" will either, but we'll see.
But that is the point. Only Congress can really fix things. We already have GAO looking into this stuff, so why duplicate efforts instead of expecting Congress to do their jobs and fix things? The DOGE itself is the epitome of inefficiency.
It really is pathetic. They are forming an agency that is not actually part of the government but calls itself that, to duplicate things that actual government agencies do. And it is headed not by one person but by two, because it is so efficient.
Will my taxpayer money pay for the Doge?
Yes, they’ll likely get some inflated fee from OMB for their “consulting” services.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
GAO just issues reports. They have no bite.
I'm not sure "DOGE" will either, but we'll see.
But that is the point. Only Congress can really fix things. We already have GAO looking into this stuff, so why duplicate efforts instead of expecting Congress to do their jobs and fix things? The DOGE itself is the epitome of inefficiency.
It really is pathetic. They are forming an agency that is not actually part of the government but calls itself that, to duplicate things that actual government agencies do. And it is headed not by one person but by two, because it is so efficient.
Will my taxpayer money pay for the Doge?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
GAO just issues reports. They have no bite.
I'm not sure "DOGE" will either, but we'll see.
But that is the point. Only Congress can really fix things. We already have GAO looking into this stuff, so why duplicate efforts instead of expecting Congress to do their jobs and fix things? The DOGE itself is the epitome of inefficiency.
It really is pathetic. They are forming an agency that is not actually part of the government but calls itself that, to duplicate things that actual government agencies do. And it is headed not by one person but by two, because it is so efficient.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
GAO just issues reports. They have no bite.
I'm not sure "DOGE" will either, but we'll see.
But that is the point. Only Congress can really fix things. We already have GAO looking into this stuff, so why duplicate efforts instead of expecting Congress to do their jobs and fix things? The DOGE itself is the epitome of inefficiency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
GAO just issues reports. They have no bite.
I'm not sure "DOGE" will either, but we'll see.
Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they have no power.
I will just point and laugh. DOGE is a joke anyway.
DOGE or no DOGE they are coming for your jobs. And some of you will be unemployed. If anyone thinks this time around they will leave the federal workforce intact then you are not paying attention to their determination.