Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Many people don’t watch a show that’s been a cultural barometer for the last half-century.

My teens watched last night for Chappel Roan.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok I know you all loved the skit.

For me, the ageism and ableism portrayed made me sick. Making fun of someone who had trouble opening a heavy door that was out of his reach?

Sure I know Trump has said similar things to others, but I thought this election was about “turning the page”, “being better”.

Disappointed this turned out to be a mean girls gab session getting right down to the gutter level.

We see you.

"They are eating the dogs!"

Whataboutism.

Anonymous wrote:Ok I know you all loved the skit.

For me, the ageism and ableism portrayed made me sick. Making fun of someone who had trouble opening a heavy door that was out of his reach?

Sure I know Trump has said similar things to others, but I thought this election was about “turning the page”, “being better”.

Disappointed this turned out to be a mean girls gab session getting right down to the gutter level.

We see you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok I know you all loved the skit.

For me, the ageism and ableism portrayed made me sick. Making fun of someone who had trouble opening a heavy door that was out of his reach?

Sure I know Trump has said similar things to others, but I thought this election was about “turning the page”, “being better”.

Disappointed this turned out to be a mean girls gab session getting right down to the gutter level.

We see you.

"They are eating the dogs!"

Anonymous wrote:Ok I know you all loved the skit.

For me, the ageism and ableism portrayed made me sick. Making fun of someone who had trouble opening a heavy door that was out of his reach?

Sure I know Trump has said similar things to others, but I thought this election was about “turning the page”, “being better”.

Disappointed this turned out to be a mean girls gab session getting right down to the gutter level.

We see you.

Anonymous wrote:If you're not able to talk policy with Rogan, you do what you can.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FTC is looking into how this violated campaign election laws

Why the heck would the Federal Trade Commission care about SNL?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Do you think she's going on a news show or a podcast at 11:30pm on Saturday night? It was a perfectly reasonable use of that time slot and not that hard to simply stop in NY on her way between campaign events in NC and GA on Saturday and then WI and MI on Sunday. It's a national audience and allows her to show a different side of her personality. Well worth the stop in NY at a time when few other voters are up or receptive to a campaign argument.

What she needs to show is that she has policy substance, away from skits, teleprompters, and prepared remarks. This does nothing for that.

She has. compare her 82+ pages of detailed policy agenda to the blathering that her opponent does. If this is your concern than you are not a serious voter.

You can't just refer people to a website. Harris did that in bizarre fashion on the Fox interview. She needs to be able to verbalize and discuss her policies, herself, not just read from talking points. Right now, she is viewed as anti-Trump. That works for some but to get over the hump, she has to verbalize what she will do as President. Skipping Rogan was a big mistake.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Do you think she's going on a news show or a podcast at 11:30pm on Saturday night? It was a perfectly reasonable use of that time slot and not that hard to simply stop in NY on her way between campaign events in NC and GA on Saturday and then WI and MI on Sunday. It's a national audience and allows her to show a different side of her personality. Well worth the stop in NY at a time when few other voters are up or receptive to a campaign argument.

What she needs to show is that she has policy substance, away from skits, teleprompters, and prepared remarks. This does nothing for that.

You mean like at a debate? Where she wiped the floor with Trump? Or in one of the 400 sit down interviews she's given in the last month? If you want policy and substance she has offered that. This was a 3 minute comedy sketch.

Why did no one respond to Trumps lengthy stunts at McDonalds or with the garbage truck with "he need to show he has policy substance." Oh his Joe Rogan podcast? I mostly just learned about his desire to be a whale psychologist. And I'd rather watch a president give a pre-written speech off a teleprompter that actually makes sense and says something meaningful than watch one "riff" on how the people who set up his mic are stupid and then mime fellatio on the mic stand.

But yes, by all means, let's get mad at Harris for spending a few minutes making jokes with Maya Rudolph between campaing stops

Debate was prepared remarks, the product of days of preparation. Harris's weak spot in voters' minds is whether she has the substance to lead the US. This doesn't do anything for that. Her target audience now how should be winning over undecideds. This just plays to her base.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Do you think she's going on a news show or a podcast at 11:30pm on Saturday night? It was a perfectly reasonable use of that time slot and not that hard to simply stop in NY on her way between campaign events in NC and GA on Saturday and then WI and MI on Sunday. It's a national audience and allows her to show a different side of her personality. Well worth the stop in NY at a time when few other voters are up or receptive to a campaign argument.

What she needs to show is that she has policy substance, away from skits, teleprompters, and prepared remarks. This does nothing for that.

She has. compare her 82+ pages of detailed policy agenda to the blathering that her opponent does. If this is your concern than you are not a serious voter.

You can't just refer people to a website. Harris did that in bizarre fashion on the Fox interview. She needs to be able to verbalize and discuss her policies, herself, not just read from talking points. Right now, she is viewed as anti-Trump. That works for some but to get over the hump, she has to verbalize what she will do as President. Skipping Rogan was a big mistake.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Do you think she's going on a news show or a podcast at 11:30pm on Saturday night? It was a perfectly reasonable use of that time slot and not that hard to simply stop in NY on her way between campaign events in NC and GA on Saturday and then WI and MI on Sunday. It's a national audience and allows her to show a different side of her personality. Well worth the stop in NY at a time when few other voters are up or receptive to a campaign argument.

What she needs to show is that she has policy substance, away from skits, teleprompters, and prepared remarks. This does nothing for that.

She has. compare her 82+ pages of detailed policy agenda to the blathering that her opponent does. If this is your concern than you are not a serious voter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Do you think she's going on a news show or a podcast at 11:30pm on Saturday night? It was a perfectly reasonable use of that time slot and not that hard to simply stop in NY on her way between campaign events in NC and GA on Saturday and then WI and MI on Sunday. It's a national audience and allows her to show a different side of her personality. Well worth the stop in NY at a time when few other voters are up or receptive to a campaign argument.

What she needs to show is that she has policy substance, away from skits, teleprompters, and prepared remarks. This does nothing for that.

You mean like at a debate? Where she wiped the floor with Trump? Or in one of the 400 sit down interviews she's given in the last month? If you want policy and substance she has offered that. This was a 3 minute comedy sketch.

Why did no one respond to Trumps lengthy stunts at McDonalds or with the garbage truck with "he need to show he has policy substance." Oh his Joe Rogan podcast? I mostly just learned about his desire to be a whale psychologist. And I'd rather watch a president give a pre-written speech off a teleprompter that actually makes sense and says something meaningful than watch one "riff" on how the people who set up his mic are stupid and then mime fellatio on the mic stand.

But yes, by all means, let's get mad at Harris for spending a few minutes making jokes with Maya Rudolph between campaing stops

Debate was prepared remarks, the product of days of preparation. Harris's weak spot in voters' minds is whether she has the substance to lead the US. This doesn't do anything for that. Her target audience now how should be winning over undecideds. This just plays to her base.

Turn out the base! This seems a lot more effective then having some billionaire pay for hauling out-of-staters around Michigan in a U haul cargo van to get a buck or two per door.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Do you think she's going on a news show or a podcast at 11:30pm on Saturday night? It was a perfectly reasonable use of that time slot and not that hard to simply stop in NY on her way between campaign events in NC and GA on Saturday and then WI and MI on Sunday. It's a national audience and allows her to show a different side of her personality. Well worth the stop in NY at a time when few other voters are up or receptive to a campaign argument.

What she needs to show is that she has policy substance, away from skits, teleprompters, and prepared remarks. This does nothing for that.

You mean like at a debate? Where she wiped the floor with Trump? Or in one of the 400 sit down interviews she's given in the last month? If you want policy and substance she has offered that. This was a 3 minute comedy sketch.

Why did no one respond to Trumps lengthy stunts at McDonalds or with the garbage truck with "he need to show he has policy substance." Oh his Joe Rogan podcast? I mostly just learned about his desire to be a whale psychologist. And I'd rather watch a president give a pre-written speech off a teleprompter that actually makes sense and says something meaningful than watch one "riff" on how the people who set up his mic are stupid and then mime fellatio on the mic stand.

But yes, by all means, let's get mad at Harris for spending a few minutes making jokes with Maya Rudolph between campaing stops

Debate was prepared remarks, the product of days of preparation. Harris's weak spot in voters' minds is whether she has the substance to lead the US. This doesn't do anything for that. Her target audience now how should be winning over undecideds. This just plays to her base.