Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m really torn, especially after seeing today’s opinion columns which very explicitly called out Bezos for overruling the editorial desk. If we all cancel, won’t it just lead to further deterioration of one of the few remaining decent papers in the country?
I used to love the NyTimes but they are getting really patchy. Science reporting is still okay but they have picked on Biden and Harris for really picayune things while giving Trump a total free pass on absolutely insane things he has said or done — it’s like their false paradigm of impartiality is to report equally on both sides even if one side is doing a lot more that should be called out and questioned.
And CNN is half click bait and half self-promotion. Their Ukraine coverage was phenomenal but the other stuff is often very superficial or self-promoting (like an article about tapper interviewing someone).

So your main objection is that they have called Harris and Biden out on “picayune” things. How dare they! I wonder what those picayune things could be? Biden’s dementia? The sale of his office through his son’s paintings? Targeting of political enemies through the legal system? Picayune indeed.

Yes we are all angry that Biden threatened to use national guard against the opposite party for vague reasons, talked about bringing back military tribunals, and even stated that it would be ok to bypass the actual laws and rules of the constitution to get his way when seeking retribution?

Shhhh don't tell them it was Trump! It helps them stay angry when you replace his name with Biden!

What are you unhinged lefties going to do when Trump wins? You will lose your minds because you actually believe all this fascist bullshit that is being spread.

All the leftists including you will be in reeducation camps.

Anonymous wrote:The Post was already losing hundreds of millions of dollars. Being a liberal darling ended up being really bad for the paper financially.

I’m sure Bezos wouldn’t mind losing the MSNBC crowd as a core subscriber base, along with any journalist who would quit in protest. The fact that so many journalists that are obviously ideologically committed left wing liberals have not quit says everything there is to know.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m really torn, especially after seeing today’s opinion columns which very explicitly called out Bezos for overruling the editorial desk. If we all cancel, won’t it just lead to further deterioration of one of the few remaining decent papers in the country?
I used to love the NyTimes but they are getting really patchy. Science reporting is still okay but they have picked on Biden and Harris for really picayune things while giving Trump a total free pass on absolutely insane things he has said or done — it’s like their false paradigm of impartiality is to report equally on both sides even if one side is doing a lot more that should be called out and questioned.
And CNN is half click bait and half self-promotion. Their Ukraine coverage was phenomenal but the other stuff is often very superficial or self-promoting (like an article about tapper interviewing someone).

So your main objection is that they have called Harris and Biden out on “picayune” things. How dare they! I wonder what those picayune things could be? Biden’s dementia? The sale of his office through his son’s paintings? Targeting of political enemies through the legal system? Picayune indeed.

Yes we are all angry that Biden threatened to use national guard against the opposite party for vague reasons, talked about bringing back military tribunals, and even stated that it would be ok to bypass the actual laws and rules of the constitution to get his way when seeking retribution?

Shhhh don't tell them it was Trump! It helps them stay angry when you replace his name with Biden!

What are you unhinged lefties going to do when Trump wins? You will lose your minds because you actually believe all this fascist bullshit that is being spread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m really torn, especially after seeing today’s opinion columns which very explicitly called out Bezos for overruling the editorial desk. If we all cancel, won’t it just lead to further deterioration of one of the few remaining decent papers in the country?
I used to love the NyTimes but they are getting really patchy. Science reporting is still okay but they have picked on Biden and Harris for really picayune things while giving Trump a total free pass on absolutely insane things he has said or done — it’s like their false paradigm of impartiality is to report equally on both sides even if one side is doing a lot more that should be called out and questioned.
And CNN is half click bait and half self-promotion. Their Ukraine coverage was phenomenal but the other stuff is often very superficial or self-promoting (like an article about tapper interviewing someone).

So your main objection is that they have called Harris and Biden out on “picayune” things. How dare they! I wonder what those picayune things could be? Biden’s dementia? The sale of his office through his son’s paintings? Targeting of political enemies through the legal system? Picayune indeed.

Yes we are all angry that Biden threatened to use national guard against the opposite party for vague reasons, talked about bringing back military tribunals, and even stated that it would be ok to bypass the actual laws and rules of the constitution to get his way when seeking retribution?

Well, one thing that distinguishes the two is that Trump talks a bug game; Biden actually did it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m really torn, especially after seeing today’s opinion columns which very explicitly called out Bezos for overruling the editorial desk. If we all cancel, won’t it just lead to further deterioration of one of the few remaining decent papers in the country?
I used to love the NyTimes but they are getting really patchy. Science reporting is still okay but they have picked on Biden and Harris for really picayune things while giving Trump a total free pass on absolutely insane things he has said or done — it’s like their false paradigm of impartiality is to report equally on both sides even if one side is doing a lot more that should be called out and questioned.
And CNN is half click bait and half self-promotion. Their Ukraine coverage was phenomenal but the other stuff is often very superficial or self-promoting (like an article about tapper interviewing someone).

So your main objection is that they have called Harris and Biden out on “picayune” things. How dare they! I wonder what those picayune things could be? Biden’s dementia? The sale of his office through his son’s paintings? Targeting of political enemies through the legal system? Picayune indeed.

Yes we are all angry that Biden threatened to use national guard against the opposite party for vague reasons, talked about bringing back military tribunals, and even stated that it would be ok to bypass the actual laws and rules of the constitution to get his way when seeking retribution?

Shhhh don't tell them it was Trump! It helps them stay angry when you replace his name with Biden!

What are you unhinged lefties going to do when Trump wins? You will lose your minds because you actually believe all this fascist bullshit that is being spread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m really torn, especially after seeing today’s opinion columns which very explicitly called out Bezos for overruling the editorial desk. If we all cancel, won’t it just lead to further deterioration of one of the few remaining decent papers in the country?
I used to love the NyTimes but they are getting really patchy. Science reporting is still okay but they have picked on Biden and Harris for really picayune things while giving Trump a total free pass on absolutely insane things he has said or done — it’s like their false paradigm of impartiality is to report equally on both sides even if one side is doing a lot more that should be called out and questioned.
And CNN is half click bait and half self-promotion. Their Ukraine coverage was phenomenal but the other stuff is often very superficial or self-promoting (like an article about tapper interviewing someone).

So your main objection is that they have called Harris and Biden out on “picayune” things. How dare they! I wonder what those picayune things could be? Biden’s dementia? The sale of his office through his son’s paintings? Targeting of political enemies through the legal system? Picayune indeed.

Yes we are all angry that Biden threatened to use national guard against the opposite party for vague reasons, talked about bringing back military tribunals, and even stated that it would be ok to bypass the actual laws and rules of the constitution to get his way when seeking retribution?

Shhhh don't tell them it was Trump! It helps them stay angry when you replace his name with Biden!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m really torn, especially after seeing today’s opinion columns which very explicitly called out Bezos for overruling the editorial desk. If we all cancel, won’t it just lead to further deterioration of one of the few remaining decent papers in the country?
I used to love the NyTimes but they are getting really patchy. Science reporting is still okay but they have picked on Biden and Harris for really picayune things while giving Trump a total free pass on absolutely insane things he has said or done — it’s like their false paradigm of impartiality is to report equally on both sides even if one side is doing a lot more that should be called out and questioned.
And CNN is half click bait and half self-promotion. Their Ukraine coverage was phenomenal but the other stuff is often very superficial or self-promoting (like an article about tapper interviewing someone).

So your main objection is that they have called Harris and Biden out on “picayune” things. How dare they! I wonder what those picayune things could be? Biden’s dementia? The sale of his office through his son’s paintings? Targeting of political enemies through the legal system? Picayune indeed.

Yes we are all angry that Biden threatened to use national guard against the opposite party for vague reasons, talked about bringing back military tribunals, and even stated that it would be ok to bypass the actual laws and rules of the constitution to get his way when seeking retribution?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m really torn, especially after seeing today’s opinion columns which very explicitly called out Bezos for overruling the editorial desk. If we all cancel, won’t it just lead to further deterioration of one of the few remaining decent papers in the country?
I used to love the NyTimes but they are getting really patchy. Science reporting is still okay but they have picked on Biden and Harris for really picayune things while giving Trump a total free pass on absolutely insane things he has said or done — it’s like their false paradigm of impartiality is to report equally on both sides even if one side is doing a lot more that should be called out and questioned.
And CNN is half click bait and half self-promotion. Their Ukraine coverage was phenomenal but the other stuff is often very superficial or self-promoting (like an article about tapper interviewing someone).

So your main objection is that they have called Harris and Biden out on “picayune” things. How dare they! I wonder what those picayune things could be? Biden’s dementia? The sale of his office through his son’s paintings? Targeting of political enemies through the legal system? Picayune indeed.

Yes we are all angry that Biden threatened to use national guard against the opposite party for vague reasons, talked about bringing back military tribunals, and even stated that it would be ok to bypass the actual laws and rules of the constitution to get his way when seeking retribution?

Anonymous wrote:Np. I canceled this morning.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m really torn, especially after seeing today’s opinion columns which very explicitly called out Bezos for overruling the editorial desk. If we all cancel, won’t it just lead to further deterioration of one of the few remaining decent papers in the country?
I used to love the NyTimes but they are getting really patchy. Science reporting is still okay but they have picked on Biden and Harris for really picayune things while giving Trump a total free pass on absolutely insane things he has said or done — it’s like their false paradigm of impartiality is to report equally on both sides even if one side is doing a lot more that should be called out and questioned.
And CNN is half click bait and half self-promotion. Their Ukraine coverage was phenomenal but the other stuff is often very superficial or self-promoting (like an article about tapper interviewing someone).

So your main objection is that they have called Harris and Biden out on “picayune” things. How dare they! I wonder what those picayune things could be? Biden’s dementia? The sale of his office through his son’s paintings? Targeting of political enemies through the legal system? Picayune indeed.