Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's very simple:
Screens
Overly processed food/DoorDash/Starbucks...all the BS "food" that's at their fingertips
We're not allowed to tell our teens to eat less/be more active when they're looking chunky because that's body-shaming
I live in a college-town outside of the DC area and I can't get over how these college kids and what they wear showing off their huge butts and fat bellies. Nobody was walking around like that when I was in college.
I think this is pretty much it, including that there is an acceptance that wasn't as prevalent before -- which is probably better for mental health but worse for physical health.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So we’re talking ages 12 to 27? OP’s observations don’t match what I see at my kids HS, my work, or the gym.
A 12-27 is probably at a gym precisely because they have weight problems.
When I was 27, I was in great shape because I was very active with outdoor activities with friends. Catch me slaving away on gym equipment. No way!
Anonymous wrote:It's very simple:
Screens
Overly processed food/DoorDash/Starbucks...all the BS "food" that's at their fingertips
We're not allowed to tell our teens to eat less/be more active when they're looking chunky because that's body-shaming
I live in a college-town outside of the DC area and I can't get over how these college kids and what they wear showing off their huge butts and fat bellies. Nobody was walking around like that when I was in college.
Anonymous wrote:My teenagers are in far better shape than my Gen X body. But that's because we work like dogs at our desks to give them constant activity -- sports, skiing, scouts, private schools that prioritize physical ed, memberships to gyms. They're really fit.
American processed food is garbage. We keep the house stocked with loads of fresh fruit and produce, and cooking at home is always healthier than ordering in or going out.
You need to be shamed. But it probably wouldn't matter to you.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously, when I go to the gym, so many Gen Z are tubs of lard. This 45 year old dog can deadlift 605 lbs, yet you see so many gen z huffing and puffing trying to run 3/4 of a mile on 5.5 treadmill setting. Man, Gen Z is so fat and out of shape when 40 and 50 year old somethings are in better shape than they are.
Sizeism and “fat-shaming” are forms of oppression, OP.
Jeff really needs to ban you.
Some people need to be fat shamed
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's very simple:
Screens
Overly processed food/DoorDash/Starbucks...all the BS "food" that's at their fingertips
We're not allowed to tell our teens to eat less/be more active when they're looking chunky because that's body-shaming
I live in a college-town outside of the DC area and I can't get over how these college kids and what they wear showing off their huge butts and fat bellies. Nobody was walking around like that when I was in college.
One thing I have noticed on this board is the successful, UMC dismissal of the importance of actually preparing real food for one’s family. Way more important for both parents to always be hustling to make as much money as possible. Why bake bread when you can buy it? Why cook a meal when you can get takeout? Why prepare your teenager’s dinner when they can eat a peanut butter sandwich or a bowl of Cheerios. (And this is not meant as a SAHM vs WOHM debate. My parents worked but also prioritized cooking for the family with actual real food. My generation seems to have completely different priorities from my observations.)
So if the kids these days don’t think that what they’re putting in their bodies matters, that’s on the generation before them.
Most UMC kids I know are thin, with thin to average weight parents. I can think of very few overweight ones I know. My dh ate like you described growing up and he was very fit. It wa the classic MC American diet, with two working parents not home early enough to make dinner, lots of pizza, chinese food and microwavable lasagna. UMC people I know have one/two flexible schedules, time and money for Whole Foods. The kids who are heavy are the ones who don't do sports and get extra junk outside the home like the frappucinos and fried chicken.
Lots of takeout (including pizza and Chinese food) was NOT the classic MC American diet when we were kids. We got takeout maybe 1-2 times per month (unless fortnightly pizza is a lot to you) because it was expensive for actual MC families to get takeout. We only went to restaurants on special occasions. Every single family I knew was like this.
I also get triggered when people pretend you need Whole Foods money to eat healthy. You do not. You just need to prioritize buying actual ingredients (available at walmart even) and then preparing them yourself.
The lady upthread comparing how hard it is for her to cook versus her mother: that’s exactly my point. She prioritizes working 1.5 jobs with an absolutely insane commute.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's very simple:
Screens
Overly processed food/DoorDash/Starbucks...all the BS "food" that's at their fingertips
We're not allowed to tell our teens to eat less/be more active when they're looking chunky because that's body-shaming
I live in a college-town outside of the DC area and I can't get over how these college kids and what they wear showing off their huge butts and fat bellies. Nobody was walking around like that when I was in college.
One thing I have noticed on this board is the successful, UMC dismissal of the importance of actually preparing real food for one’s family. Way more important for both parents to always be hustling to make as much money as possible. Why bake bread when you can buy it? Why cook a meal when you can get takeout? Why prepare your teenager’s dinner when they can eat a peanut butter sandwich or a bowl of Cheerios. (And this is not meant as a SAHM vs WOHM debate. My parents worked but also prioritized cooking for the family with actual real food. My generation seems to have completely different priorities from my observations.)
So if the kids these days don’t think that what they’re putting in their bodies matters, that’s on the generation before them.
Most UMC kids I know are thin, with thin to average weight parents. I can think of very few overweight ones I know. My dh ate like you described growing up and he was very fit. It wa the classic MC American diet, with two working parents not home early enough to make dinner, lots of pizza, chinese food and microwavable lasagna. UMC people I know have one/two flexible schedules, time and money for Whole Foods. The kids who are heavy are the ones who don't do sports and get extra junk outside the home like the frappucinos and fried chicken.
Lots of takeout (including pizza and Chinese food) was NOT the classic MC American diet when we were kids. We got takeout maybe 1-2 times per month (unless fortnightly pizza is a lot to you) because it was expensive for actual MC families to get takeout. We only went to restaurants on special occasions. Every single family I knew was like this.
I also get triggered when people pretend you need Whole Foods money to eat healthy. You do not. You just need to prioritize buying actual ingredients (available at walmart even) and then preparing them yourself.
The lady upthread comparing how hard it is for her to cook versus her mother: that’s exactly my point. She prioritizes working 1.5 jobs with an absolutely insane commute.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's very simple:
Screens
Overly processed food/DoorDash/Starbucks...all the BS "food" that's at their fingertips
We're not allowed to tell our teens to eat less/be more active when they're looking chunky because that's body-shaming
I live in a college-town outside of the DC area and I can't get over how these college kids and what they wear showing off their huge butts and fat bellies. Nobody was walking around like that when I was in college.
One thing I have noticed on this board is the successful, UMC dismissal of the importance of actually preparing real food for one’s family. Way more important for both parents to always be hustling to make as much money as possible. Why bake bread when you can buy it? Why cook a meal when you can get takeout? Why prepare your teenager’s dinner when they can eat a peanut butter sandwich or a bowl of Cheerios. (And this is not meant as a SAHM vs WOHM debate. My parents worked but also prioritized cooking for the family with actual real food. My generation seems to have completely different priorities from my observations.)
So if the kids these days don’t think that what they’re putting in their bodies matters, that’s on the generation before them.
Most UMC kids I know are thin, with thin to average weight parents. I can think of very few overweight ones I know. My dh ate like you described growing up and he was very fit. It wa the classic MC American diet, with two working parents not home early enough to make dinner, lots of pizza, chinese food and microwavable lasagna. UMC people I know have one/two flexible schedules, time and money for Whole Foods. The kids who are heavy are the ones who don't do sports and get extra junk outside the home like the frappucinos and fried chicken.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's very simple:
Screens
Overly processed food/DoorDash/Starbucks...all the BS "food" that's at their fingertips
We're not allowed to tell our teens to eat less/be more active when they're looking chunky because that's body-shaming
I live in a college-town outside of the DC area and I can't get over how these college kids and what they wear showing off their huge butts and fat bellies. Nobody was walking around like that when I was in college.
One thing I have noticed on this board is the successful, UMC dismissal of the importance of actually preparing real food for one’s family. Way more important for both parents to always be hustling to make as much money as possible. Why bake bread when you can buy it? Why cook a meal when you can get takeout? Why prepare your teenager’s dinner when they can eat a peanut butter sandwich or a bowl of Cheerios. (And this is not meant as a SAHM vs WOHM debate. My parents worked but also prioritized cooking for the family with actual real food. My generation seems to have completely different priorities from my observations.)
So if the kids these days don’t think that what they’re putting in their bodies matters, that’s on the generation before them.
My mom worked part time, she will teach a couple class in the am, take a nap at noon and tutor a few students in the evening, and make dinner.
I work from 8-6pm plus 3 hour commute.
Is this a counter or a justification for feeding your kids crap?