Anonymous wrote:I hope he has a prenup so he can dump you and leave you poor. No offense.
quote=Anonymous]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give it 10 years, most people become more conservative as they age. You’ll be fine.
The crazy thing is, I'm not that liberal! I'm a Democrat, but I would be willing to vote for a Republican if they ran someone normal who didn't refer to me as a childless cat lady! I do agree with my boyfriend on several things politically. He's just mad I won't pull the lever for Trump, which he's about to do for the third time.
I told my republican husband that if he votes for Trump (which he is free to do), I will divorce him (which I am free to do). If he so much as hinted that women should not vote, he is gone. Somebody who disrespects you so much before marriage will not be pretty after marriage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DH is a republican and I'm a democrat. But we are both intellectually honest and reasonable so it has worked out fine.
But, fwiw, he's voting for Kamala this time. Thinks Trump is a danger to democracy.
Coming from the side that hid a mentally incompetent president, then forced him from the race (and disenfranchising 14M+ voters) and then installed a candidate who was not primaried and gave her all of the other guy’s money? Yeah, STFU about democracy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give it 10 years, most people become more conservative as they age. You’ll be fine.
The crazy thing is, I'm not that liberal! I'm a Democrat, but I would be willing to vote for a Republican if they ran someone normal who didn't refer to me as a childless cat lady! I do agree with my boyfriend on several things politically. He's just mad I won't pull the lever for Trump, which he's about to do for the third time.
Anonymous wrote:Op you unfortunately will end up an unmarried cat lady. In 10 years from now, when the truth comes to light (at least for all the brain washed) you will regret throwing in the towel on a stable, conservative man who values the idea of family. A man who was "right" all along...good luck op, signed a 35 year old married women, with children who hasn't lost her mind and still values a mans worth and family structure. GASP!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody read the WSJ…it’s the headline article today (focused on people under 30).
Basically, men are turning towards Trump and women more liberal which is chilling the dating scene.
It’s the WSJ…yet it basically says men are falling behind and Trump seems to get them (even though few of his economic policies will help them).
I guess the upside is successful, independent/liberal men will make out like bandits.
The issue about men turning toward Trump is a lazy observation. We should care about boys as much we care about girls. Repeatedly calling them toxic implying a need to "reform" them I guess isn't an answer. If these guys are going for Orange boy he is just lucky picking up hanging fruits. Our boys need help. Bravo for caring for girls and women. But let's also devote equal care and worry for the boys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody read the WSJ…it’s the headline article today (focused on people under 30).
Basically, men are turning towards Trump and women more liberal which is chilling the dating scene.
It’s the WSJ…yet it basically says men are falling behind and Trump seems to get them (even though few of his economic policies will help them).
I guess the upside is successful, independent/liberal men will make out like bandits.
The issue about men turning toward Trump is a lazy observation. We should care about boys as much we care about girls. Repeatedly calling them toxic implying a need to "reform" them I guess isn't an answer. If these guys are going for Orange boy he is just lucky picking up hanging fruits. Our boys need help. Bravo for caring for girls and women. But let's also devote equal care and worry for the boys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A difference of political opinion is reserved for normal people who disagree on funding for infrastructure or education.
It isn't normal to think that it's "debatable" whether a corrupt, rapist, pos who (to anyone w/ an IQ above one digit) cares nothing about democracy and tried to overthrow it, would sentence people to death for any reason involving his own ego and has never in his entire sh*t life been a patriot or made any sacrifices for this nation, is qualified to be president.
And if your stupid instinct is to think that's some automatic defense of the Democrats, it's why putrid MAGAs have earned their reputation for being putrid. Absolutely no ability to see how vile you must be to support that scum.
He still went to an Ivy league school. And so did the craziest at the supreme court and a non negligible members of Republican congresspeople. We have a weird and interesting system in this country to be honest. Some of the people who are trying to destroy our country went to some our best colleges but we still refer to them as having low IQs and/or have low regard for their intellect.
You mean Hawley, Cruz, Stefanic, Desantis, Trump, C Thomas, Cotton, and God countless others. And by the way these universities still continue to pump these types of people. I don't know their socio economic background but I will suspect many of them or a good portion of them come from privilege background. My son goes to an Ivy league school and I'll be honest his academic credentials alone didn't get him in. Yes he is a good student but nothing stellar. It is what it is.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody read the WSJ…it’s the headline article today (focused on people under 30).
Basically, men are turning towards Trump and women more liberal which is chilling the dating scene.
It’s the WSJ…yet it basically says men are falling behind and Trump seems to get them (even though few of his economic policies will help them).
I guess the upside is successful, independent/liberal men will make out like bandits.
Anonymous wrote:Op you unfortunately will end up an unmarried cat lady. In 10 years from now, when the truth comes to light (at least for all the brain washed) you will regret throwing in the towel on a stable, conservative man who values the idea of family. A man who was "right" all along...good luck op, signed a 35 year old married women, with children who hasn't lost her mind and still values a mans worth and family structure. GASP!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A difference of political opinion is reserved for normal people who disagree on funding for infrastructure or education.
It isn't normal to think that it's "debatable" whether a corrupt, rapist, pos who (to anyone w/ an IQ above one digit) cares nothing about democracy and tried to overthrow it, would sentence people to death for any reason involving his own ego and has never in his entire sh*t life been a patriot or made any sacrifices for this nation, is qualified to be president.
And if your stupid instinct is to think that's some automatic defense of the Democrats, it's why putrid MAGAs have earned their reputation for being putrid. Absolutely no ability to see how vile you must be to support that scum.
He still went to an Ivy league school. And so did the craziest at the supreme court and a non negligible members of Republican congresspeople. We have a weird and interesting system in this country to be honest. Some of the people who are trying to destroy our country went to some our best colleges but we still refer to them as having low IQs and/or have low regard for their intellect.
Those once great learning institutions have become Marxist indoctrination centers.