Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain where these claims of religious persecution come from?
bias
Did I miss something? Is he well-known for being religious? Or having controversial religious views?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain where these claims of religious persecution come from?
bias
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not teachers defending hm, it’s his own people coming into rescue him; they always play the victim. Just like when they said he was being persecuted because of this religion. It’s truly gross the lengths they are willing to go even when they know he’s wrong. He should never be allowed near kids again.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s also think about how awful parents are these days. The parent may have been out for him because the child has behavioral problems and the parent doesn’t want to admit it. Parents are so entitled in this area. And I can say this because I live here!
Interesting to read this thread and see teachers swooping in to defend this criminal. And now blaming parents and saying how awful they are. My kids are grown now and did not attend MCPS for this very reason. Teachers at MCPS tend to be very entitled most likely due to their union association. The us and them mentality is so bureaucratic and typical of pubic school teachers. This post is the perfect illustration of teachers acting entitled!
And if your kids didn’t attend MCPS, you don’t know anything about teachers and their behavior.
Interesting that you already have determined his guilt. He’s been accused not convicted. How about innocent until proven. All we know is what was released yesterday which doesn’t necessarily include all the information. So many unknowns and I just think it’s wrong that some have already determined what transpired without all the facts.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain where these claims of religious persecution come from?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids went to Barnsley when he was there. He definitely had his favorite students and it was obvious who they were. I’m not surprised that some people are defending him and some are calling him out. He definitely had two sides.
This is every single teacher and administrator in every building all over the world.
Anonymous wrote:My kids went to Barnsley when he was there. He definitely had his favorite students and it was obvious who they were. I’m not surprised that some people are defending him and some are calling him out. He definitely had two sides.
Anonymous wrote:You’re a lunatic. There is absolutely no excuse for what he did. You probably abuse your kids too based off your idea of acceptable behavior for an adult toward a child. I seriously hope you don’t have contact with children in your job.Anonymous wrote:I don’t think he was stomping in anger. I think he was showing the child that stomping isn’t a good idea. I might assume the child stomped on another kid’s foot. Just speculation!
+1. Finally MCPS is doing something right.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The RPES principal position is now posted on Careers.
Good to see MCPS moving forward in resolving this in favor of school safety.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s also think about how awful parents are these days. The parent may have been out for him because the child has behavioral problems and the parent doesn’t want to admit it. Parents are so entitled in this area. And I can say this because I live here!
Interesting to read this thread and see teachers swooping in to defend this criminal. And now blaming parents and saying how awful they are. My kids are grown now and did not attend MCPS for this very reason. Teachers at MCPS tend to be very entitled most likely due to their union association. The us and them mentality is so bureaucratic and typical of pubic school teachers. This post is the perfect illustration of teachers acting entitled!
Anonymous wrote:The RPES principal position is now posted on Careers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think he was stomping in anger. I think he was showing the child that stomping isn’t a good idea. I might assume the child stomped on another kid’s foot. Just speculation!
I will show you that stomping on people isn't a good idea by stomping on you?
No. I would assume he didn’t actually stomp on him. Camera angle has been reported as inconclusive.