Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

You can't pick and choose, Donald

You can't change Johnny Cochran's infamous legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a top, top lawyer. His legacy is good. Blame Fuhrman for being a racist. A racist who after his career with the LAPD was over, was still able to land gigs with Fox News. But then again, I guess that wouldn't fit your narrative would it?

Your narrative is a fairytale. Mark Fuhrman being a despicable racist doesn't change Johnny Cochran's actions and legacy. You can think otherwise all you want.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this doc was meant to be released while OJ was still alive?

When the sisters were on Today, they talked about the timing of OJ’s death and said that the timing had nothing to do with OJ and everything to do with when they were finally ready to tell Nicole’s story.

It’s likely the timing relates to 30th death anniversary which is in a few days . I believe them. OJ dying probably gives them some relief but frankly who I really want to hear from are Nicole Simpsons children . What was life like between both families? What do they recall about their mom? The case? Do they think their dad did it? What did he tell them as he died?

These kids are not here to entertain your every curiosity.

Have some compassion and less selfishness!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

Funny you compare Cochran to Hitler and not OJ’s Jewish defense attorneys . Cochran gets painted as a bad guy when Shapiro and everyone else aren’t.

Hitlers actual fanboy was Furhman.

He had a swastika on his police locker. His own fellow cops were the ones who ratted on him and said he shouldn’t be lead detective on the case.

Again, the city of LA messed up. Furhman shouldn’t have been lead detective. He plead the fifth when asked if he participated in evidence planting or tampering with this case.

The entire case should’ve been hung jury and tried

He was not the lead detective.

Get your facts straight!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s enjoyable but what on earth did Dominique do to herself? What has been her story these past 30 years? The sisters were so pretty during the trial. Shame they possibly didn’t feel the same way.

All of the sisters have gone through issues with alcohol addiction and mental health issues. Dominique's son recently died young. Denise's son was arrested for domestic battery not long ago.

He may have been arrested for domestic battery, but was he convicted of anything?

OJ wasn’t convicted. Does that mean anything to you? They have money so of course convictions wont happen esp for first offense. Money talks .

These women look like parenting was last on their to do lists. Botox and partying were far more important

Regardless of OJ not being convicted, it doesn't mean that every man that is arrested for domestic battery is guilty. Sometimes false charges are made, and sometimes both parties are guilty of the same alleged offense.

This is hypocritical. You sound like the OJ defenders.

DV is DV. Frankly, the Brown family aren’t the best at parenting . Not for nothing but none of Nicole’s sisters fought to get custody of her kids. They can’t handle parenting. The kids were given to OJ.

Sister -in-laws are not going to be able to wrestle kids from their (wealthy) biological father

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s enjoyable but what on earth did Dominique do to herself? What has been her story these past 30 years? The sisters were so pretty during the trial. Shame they possibly didn’t feel the same way.

All of the sisters have gone through issues with alcohol addiction and mental health issues. Dominique's son recently died young. Denise's son was arrested for domestic battery not long ago.

He may have been arrested for domestic battery, but was he convicted of anything?

OJ wasn’t convicted. Does that mean anything to you? They have money so of course convictions wont happen esp for first offense. Money talks .

These women look like parenting was last on their to do lists. Botox and partying were far more important

Were there fathers involved? Because I only fear you condemning the mothers. Who had lived through the trauma of having their sister murdered, and the murderer going Scott free .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For his role in that acquitral, don't know how Johnny Cochran slept at night.

I am certain that he slept well because he won the case of the century.

+1

You sound quite immoral.

Anonymous wrote:It’s enjoyable but what on earth did Dominique do to herself? What has been her story these past 30 years? The sisters were so pretty during the trial. Shame they possibly didn’t feel the same way.

Why do you people always focus on women’s appearance!!!

Regardless of the context.

It is extremely sexist and sad for half the human race.

Anonymous wrote:Once Furhman was out of the picture for the civil case, Oj was found liable for the murders .

Thankfully some people had a conscience and were willing to find him liable despite those who defended him.

Once Furhman was out of the picture for the civil case, Oj was found liable for the murders .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

You can't pick and choose, Donald

You can't change Johnny Cochran's infamous legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a top, top lawyer. His legacy is good. Blame Fuhrman for being a racist. A racist who after his career with the LAPD was over, was still able to land gigs with Fox News. But then again, I guess that wouldn't fit your narrative would it?

Do you think Cochrane ever used any racial slurs?

Doubt it. There’s no evidence of such. He was really on Furhman’s case about the anti Semite stories more than he was about the n word thought his comparisons to Hitler made some like Shapiro upset.

Not sure why though. Furhman harassed an officer who married a Jewish spouse and refused to say congratulations . He was really awful.

He also had Nazi memorabilia in his work locker . He plead the fifth about every accusation . What are the chances a Neo Nazi sympathizer in LA of all places would be lead detective andhe’s never led a homicide investigation before? Somehow, he lands not only the most famous one but a double homicide case.

If you told me LA wanted OJ free, I’d believe it because the self sabotage was too much from the beginning of the case. Everyone in that department knew Furhman would botch the investigation

k