Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The same guy that is a great coach that brought 90% of the boys to the program is moving to another league that aligns better to his vision (which is actually focused on child development and the love for soccer). So what???

I believe this is called 'Spin' in the world of politics

You're saying this is the proper way to do such a move?

If having coaches, families and players remain loyal to an organization that doesn't stand by their mission then yes, a move is needed. I don't have the background of the disagreements behind the scenes to say this was or wasn't "the proper way to do such a move". Sure, all the adults could taken more professional actions. My only and main point here is, don't let these actions impact the kids. Was it a rule or law that mandated the director to forfeit these kids from the tournament?? It was out of spite, period. And a disgraceful action on her part.

What about the coach who took whole teams to tryout at another club with the intent of leaving current club to join new club and taking them with him?
Ethical?

I'm not aware of any of the kids actively trying out at other clubs until these changes were announced. All the kids were committed to ending this season and these actions by all of the leaders truly came as a surprise to everyone. All families had to make very tough, unplanned decisions these epast few weeks. I was unaware these contracts are longer than 10 months, any family has the right to switch leagues in the Fall, no? And if the league they are playing on no longer commits to their values then why wouldn't families want to follow a coach that does....after the season ends though, right? The children weren't given that opportunity to finish due to a very poor decision.

Families that knew were already trying out for other clubs before the changes were announced. They had a head start on all the other families that didn't know. ROSA coach also made sure a lot families had spots secured with Potomac. Tryouts were just a formality.

Yes shiny new toys. Potomac Club tryouts were a charade with 100 kids vying for a few slots since the ECNL teams were made up in April (with rosa kids) and the rest of the kids were looked over in favor of incoming rosa kids. All fake smiles and appearing any kid had a chance.. Such a disgrace to see kids out there giving it their best shot and in reality, Potomac was just looking for a few standouts

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The same guy that is a great coach that brought 90% of the boys to the program is moving to another league that aligns better to his vision (which is actually focused on child development and the love for soccer). So what???

I believe this is called 'Spin' in the world of politics

You're saying this is the proper way to do such a move?

If having coaches, families and players remain loyal to an organization that doesn't stand by their mission then yes, a move is needed. I don't have the background of the disagreements behind the scenes to say this was or wasn't "the proper way to do such a move". Sure, all the adults could taken more professional actions. My only and main point here is, don't let these actions impact the kids. Was it a rule or law that mandated the director to forfeit these kids from the tournament?? It was out of spite, period. And a disgraceful action on her part.

What about the coach who took whole teams to tryout at another club with the intent of leaving current club to join new club and taking them with him?
Ethical?

I'm not aware of any of the kids actively trying out at other clubs until these changes were announced. All the kids were committed to ending this season and these actions by all of the leaders truly came as a surprise to everyone. All families had to make very tough, unplanned decisions these epast few weeks. I was unaware these contracts are longer than 10 months, any family has the right to switch leagues in the Fall, no? And if the league they are playing on no longer commits to their values then why wouldn't families want to follow a coach that does....after the season ends though, right? The children weren't given that opportunity to finish due to a very poor decision.

Families that knew were already trying out for other clubs before the changes were announced. They had a head start on all the other families that didn't know. ROSA coach also made sure a lot families had spots secured with Potomac. Tryouts were just a formality.

Yes shiny new toys. Potomac Club tryouts were a charade with 100 kids vying for a few slots since the ECNL teams were made up in April (with rosa kids) and the rest of the kids were looked over in favor of incoming rosa kids. All fake smiles and appearing any kid had a chance.. Such a disgrace to see kids out there giving it their best shot and in reality, Potomac was just looking for a few standouts

I heard a bunch of Rosa players didn’t make the cut for ECNL/RL and were tossed aside. Sounds like what happened to some existing Potomac players. But what about all the 2016, 2015 and 2014 Rosa players who didn’t even have to tryout? Entire teams are joining with the two Rosa coaches. I bet they’re getting bonuses for every kid they bring over.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The same guy that is a great coach that brought 90% of the boys to the program is moving to another league that aligns better to his vision (which is actually focused on child development and the love for soccer). So what???

I believe this is called 'Spin' in the world of politics

You're saying this is the proper way to do such a move?

If having coaches, families and players remain loyal to an organization that doesn't stand by their mission then yes, a move is needed. I don't have the background of the disagreements behind the scenes to say this was or wasn't "the proper way to do such a move". Sure, all the adults could taken more professional actions. My only and main point here is, don't let these actions impact the kids. Was it a rule or law that mandated the director to forfeit these kids from the tournament?? It was out of spite, period. And a disgraceful action on her part.

What about the coach who took whole teams to tryout at another club with the intent of leaving current club to join new club and taking them with him?
Ethical?

I'm not aware of any of the kids actively trying out at other clubs until these changes were announced. All the kids were committed to ending this season and these actions by all of the leaders truly came as a surprise to everyone. All families had to make very tough, unplanned decisions these epast few weeks. I was unaware these contracts are longer than 10 months, any family has the right to switch leagues in the Fall, no? And if the league they are playing on no longer commits to their values then why wouldn't families want to follow a coach that does....after the season ends though, right? The children weren't given that opportunity to finish due to a very poor decision.

Families that knew were already trying out for other clubs before the changes were announced. They had a head start on all the other families that didn't know. ROSA coach also made sure a lot families had spots secured with Potomac. Tryouts were just a formality.

Yes shiny new toys. Potomac Club tryouts were a charade with 100 kids vying for a few slots since the ECNL teams were made up in April (with rosa kids) and the rest of the kids were looked over in favor of incoming rosa kids. All fake smiles and appearing any kid had a chance.. Such a disgrace to see kids out there giving it their best shot and in reality, Potomac was just looking for a few standouts

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The same guy that is a great coach that brought 90% of the boys to the program is moving to another league that aligns better to his vision (which is actually focused on child development and the love for soccer). So what???

I believe this is called 'Spin' in the world of politics

You're saying this is the proper way to do such a move?

If having coaches, families and players remain loyal to an organization that doesn't stand by their mission then yes, a move is needed. I don't have the background of the disagreements behind the scenes to say this was or wasn't "the proper way to do such a move". Sure, all the adults could taken more professional actions. My only and main point here is, don't let these actions impact the kids. Was it a rule or law that mandated the director to forfeit these kids from the tournament?? It was out of spite, period. And a disgraceful action on her part.

What about the coach who took whole teams to tryout at another club with the intent of leaving current club to join new club and taking them with him?
Ethical?

I'm not aware of any of the kids actively trying out at other clubs until these changes were announced. All the kids were committed to ending this season and these actions by all of the leaders truly came as a surprise to everyone. All families had to make very tough, unplanned decisions these epast few weeks. I was unaware these contracts are longer than 10 months, any family has the right to switch leagues in the Fall, no? And if the league they are playing on no longer commits to their values then why wouldn't families want to follow a coach that does....after the season ends though, right? The children weren't given that opportunity to finish due to a very poor decision.

Families that knew were already trying out for other clubs before the changes were announced. They had a head start on all the other families that didn't know. ROSA coach also made sure a lot families had spots secured with Potomac. Tryouts were just a formality.

Yes shiny new toys. Potomac Club tryouts were a charade with 100 kids vying for a few slots since the ECNL teams were made up in April (with rosa kids) and the rest of the kids were looked over in favor of incoming rosa kids. All fake smiles and appearing any kid had a chance.. Such a disgrace to see kids out there giving it their best shot and in reality, Potomac was just looking for a few standouts

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The same guy that is a great coach that brought 90% of the boys to the program is moving to another league that aligns better to his vision (which is actually focused on child development and the love for soccer). So what???

Because the potomac players who have been there for years were looked over by the new kids. So, large droves of kids in PSA were not asked back so let me it's about the kids?

Everyone is only looking at for their best interests. If both Potomac and ROSA knew about this, why wait until the last moment to announce and not provide all kids the chance to make the best decisions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The same guy that is a great coach that brought 90% of the boys to the program is moving to another league that aligns better to his vision (which is actually focused on child development and the love for soccer). So what???

I believe this is called 'Spin' in the world of politics

You're saying this is the proper way to do such a move?

If having coaches, families and players remain loyal to an organization that doesn't stand by their mission then yes, a move is needed. I don't have the background of the disagreements behind the scenes to say this was or wasn't "the proper way to do such a move". Sure, all the adults could taken more professional actions. My only and main point here is, don't let these actions impact the kids. Was it a rule or law that mandated the director to forfeit these kids from the tournament?? It was out of spite, period. And a disgraceful action on her part.

What about the coach who took whole teams to tryout at another club with the intent of leaving current club to join new club and taking them with him?
Ethical?

I'm not aware of any of the kids actively trying out at other clubs until these changes were announced. All the kids were committed to ending this season and these actions by all of the leaders truly came as a surprise to everyone. All families had to make very tough, unplanned decisions these epast few weeks. I was unaware these contracts are longer than 10 months, any family has the right to switch leagues in the Fall, no? And if the league they are playing on no longer commits to their values then why wouldn't families want to follow a coach that does....after the season ends though, right? The children weren't given that opportunity to finish due to a very poor decision.

Families that knew were already trying out for other clubs before the changes were announced. They had a head start on all the other families that didn't know. ROSA coach also made sure a lot families had spots secured with Potomac. Tryouts were just a formality.

Yes shiny new toys. Potomac Club tryouts were a charade with 100 kids vying for a few slots since the ECNL teams were made up in April (with rosa kids) and the rest of the kids were looked over in favor of incoming rosa kids. All fake smiles and appearing any kid had a chance.. Such a disgrace to see kids out there giving it their best shot and in reality, Potomac was just looking for a few standouts

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The same guy that is a great coach that brought 90% of the boys to the program is moving to another league that aligns better to his vision (which is actually focused on child development and the love for soccer). So what???

Because the potomac players who have been there for years were looked over by the new kids. So, large droves of kids in PSA were not asked back so let me it's about the kids?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The same guy that is a great coach that brought 90% of the boys to the program is moving to another league that aligns better to his vision (which is actually focused on child development and the love for soccer). So what???

I believe this is called 'Spin' in the world of politics

You're saying this is the proper way to do such a move?

If having coaches, families and players remain loyal to an organization that doesn't stand by their mission then yes, a move is needed. I don't have the background of the disagreements behind the scenes to say this was or wasn't "the proper way to do such a move". Sure, all the adults could taken more professional actions. My only and main point here is, don't let these actions impact the kids. Was it a rule or law that mandated the director to forfeit these kids from the tournament?? It was out of spite, period. And a disgraceful action on her part.

What about the coach who took whole teams to tryout at another club with the intent of leaving current club to join new club and taking them with him?
Ethical?

I'm not aware of any of the kids actively trying out at other clubs until these changes were announced. All the kids were committed to ending this season and these actions by all of the leaders truly came as a surprise to everyone. All families had to make very tough, unplanned decisions these epast few weeks. I was unaware these contracts are longer than 10 months, any family has the right to switch leagues in the Fall, no? And if the league they are playing on no longer commits to their values then why wouldn't families want to follow a coach that does....after the season ends though, right? The children weren't given that opportunity to finish due to a very poor decision.

Families that knew were already trying out for other clubs before the changes were announced. They had a head start on all the other families that didn't know. ROSA coach also made sure a lot families had spots secured with Potomac. Tryouts were just a formality.

Anonymous wrote:The same guy that is a great coach that brought 90% of the boys to the program is moving to another league that aligns better to his vision (which is actually focused on child development and the love for soccer). So what???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You're abandoning the club with a group of co-conspirators.
Stop trying to play victim.

Play with fire you get burned

You tell them Angel, that'll teach these kids!

"and the children shall suffer the sins of their fathers"

That’s the spirit of youth soccer!! F the kids. At least everyone is well aware of what ROSA cares about.

Suuuuuurrrrrreeeeee
All the other local clubs care only about the kids first and foremost and always 😁

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You're abandoning the club with a group of co-conspirators.
Stop trying to play victim.

Play with fire you get burned

You tell them Angel, that'll teach these kids!

"and the children shall suffer the sins of their fathers"

That’s the spirit of youth soccer!! F the kids. At least everyone is well aware of what ROSA cares about.

Anonymous wrote:Just when I think maybe our club is a sh*t show, I read a different thread.

I had no idea kids soccer needed its own tv show.