Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Scandal? No. Poor judgment? Yes.
I could almost care less except for the fact that sooooooooooooooo many people we know belong to that club and willingly pay for these discriminatory practices yet are appalled by discrimination outside of the club.
My husband and I declined an offer to be members there years ago because of the separate dining areas and some other unacceptable attitudes.
It’s mind numbing watching these kinds of things happen and people not having the strength of character to do the right thing
LOL, okay. Sure you did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Scandal? No. Poor judgment? Yes.
I could almost care less except for the fact that sooooooooooooooo many people we know belong to that club and willingly pay for these discriminatory practices yet are appalled by discrimination outside of the club.
My husband and I declined an offer to be members there years ago because of the separate dining areas and some other unacceptable attitudes.
It’s mind numbing watching these kinds of things happen and people not having the strength of character to do the right thing
Anonymous wrote:The public policies that allow golf courses to sit on prime real estate are hard to explain.
Anonymous wrote:I'm more scandalized by the fact that the club pays less in property taxes than their surrounding residential neighbors.
- signed, a WGCC residential neighbor (who would never belong to a country club)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Scandal? No. Poor judgment? Yes.
I could almost care less except for the fact that sooooooooooooooo many people we know belong to that club and willingly pay for these discriminatory practices yet are appalled by discrimination outside of the club.
My husband and I declined an offer to be members there years ago because of the separate dining areas and some other unacceptable attitudes.
It’s mind numbing watching these kinds of things happen and people not having the strength of character to do the right thing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why the f would any man unless gay or 90 wish to go to a male only restaurant.
they are correct to question that insanity
Because they don’t want to be around a bunch of fat screeching women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:plenty seem to like Burning TreeAnonymous wrote:why the f would any man unless gay or 90 wish to go to a male only restaurant.
they are correct to question that insanity
Women members are not subsidizing spaces they can’t enter at Burning Tree. Further, Burning Tree isn’t suckling at the government teat.
Anonymous wrote:plenty seem to like Burning TreeAnonymous wrote:why the f would any man unless gay or 90 wish to go to a male only restaurant.
they are correct to question that insanity
plenty seem to like Burning TreeAnonymous wrote:why the f would any man unless gay or 90 wish to go to a male only restaurant.
they are correct to question that insanity
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know a woman member of a country club out west who fought this battle in court and won because the county owned the land and the club leased it.
Hope the club is fully financially independent of any government support or subsidy if it wants to keep its males only dining.
Recent case law has found that status as a tax exempt organization is considered federal financial assistance.
Hope they read this is rethink their capital improvement plan.
Anonymous wrote:The club's lawyers put a racial covenant on the property in 1950....in spite of the Supreme Court ruling in Shelley (1948) that racial covenants were unenforceable.
Sit with that for a bit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why the f would any man unless gay or 90 wish to go to a male only restaurant.
they are correct to question that insanity
You clearly don’t belong to a country club. They’re very common. Even in the DC area.
Umm, you do realize there are many of us who belong to clubs with no gender based dining options, correct?
Also, where does a trans member eat in such a situation?
And don’t tell me that WGCC doesn’t have trans members because I know members of that club with trans children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why the f would any man unless gay or 90 wish to go to a male only restaurant.
they are correct to question that insanity
Locker room talk and dirty jokes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Scandal? No. Poor judgment? Yes.
I could almost care less except for the fact that sooooooooooooooo many people we know belong to that club and willingly pay for these discriminatory practices yet are appalled by discrimination outside of the club.
My husband and I declined an offer to be members there years ago because of the separate dining areas and some other unacceptable attitudes.
It’s mind numbing watching these kinds of things happen and people not having the strength of character to do the right thing