Anonymous wrote:The problem I have with the faulting of OP here is that I fail to see how you can inadvertently engage in micro-aggression. The manager seems to have stopped just short of the line by saying that the email "came across as" a micro-aggression but doesn't aggression require some level of intent? I'm not saying that we shouldn't be careful to be aware of our own unconscious biases but there is a meaningful difference between having a bias and engaging in a micro-aggression. One is negligent and the other is intentional. I find it strange that the manager didn't give the benefit of the doubt. Parents call their kids by the wrong names all the time, and mix up male and female. I've done it with my colleagues. It happens when you categorize people together, which can be a racial thing but also can be simply that they belong to a benign category (bosses, kids, etc.). I find it a little odd that OP's manager decided to imply the mistaken was a small but intentional racial slight, rather than just letting it be the mistake it was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, talk about an overreaction. That’s not a micro aggression but I guess people want to be offended about something. I think you just need to slow way down. Every time you send out an email double check the name.
+1. If someone told me that sending an email to the wrong person was a micro-aggression, I’d quietly take note that they were insane and limit future contact.
+2. Two members on my team are both gay, with several other shared characteristics of being men, middle aged, same role, some geolocation. If I mixed up their names or emails does that make me a biased homophobe?
Please, enlighten me.
It sounds like you're just trying to be edgy here. I hope you don't discount the well-documented concept that people struggle with cross-race identification. Look up the cross-race effect.
If it’s normal to struggle with cross race identification, why is it considered a microaggression?
It's common, which exactly is how a microaggression is defined:
Microaggression is a term used for commonplace verbal, behavioral or environmental slights, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative attitudes toward stigmatized or culturally marginalized groups.
That definition basically encompasses anything anyone does. How stupid.
You should look up examples of micro aggressions. Common one is “you speak English well” to a naturalized citizen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, talk about an overreaction. That’s not a micro aggression but I guess people want to be offended about something. I think you just need to slow way down. Every time you send out an email double check the name.
+1. If someone told me that sending an email to the wrong person was a micro-aggression, I’d quietly take note that they were insane and limit future contact.
+2. Two members on my team are both gay, with several other shared characteristics of being men, middle aged, same role, some geolocation. If I mixed up their names or emails does that make me a biased homophobe?
Please, enlighten me.
It sounds like you're just trying to be edgy here. I hope you don't discount the well-documented concept that people struggle with cross-race identification. Look up the cross-race effect.
If it’s normal to struggle with cross race identification, why is it considered a microaggression?
It's common, which exactly is how a microaggression is defined:
Microaggression is a term used for commonplace verbal, behavioral or environmental slights, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative attitudes toward stigmatized or culturally marginalized groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, talk about an overreaction. That’s not a micro aggression but I guess people want to be offended about something. I think you just need to slow way down. Every time you send out an email double check the name.
+1. If someone told me that sending an email to the wrong person was a micro-aggression, I’d quietly take note that they were insane and limit future contact.
+2. Two members on my team are both gay, with several other shared characteristics of being men, middle aged, same role, some geolocation. If I mixed up their names or emails does that make me a biased homophobe?
Please, enlighten me.
It sounds like you're just trying to be edgy here. I hope you don't discount the well-documented concept that people struggle with cross-race identification. Look up the cross-race effect.
If it’s normal to struggle with cross race identification, why is it considered a microaggression?
It's common, which exactly is how a microaggression is defined:
Microaggression is a term used for commonplace verbal, behavioral or environmental slights, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative attitudes toward stigmatized or culturally marginalized groups.
That definition basically encompasses anything anyone does. How stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, talk about an overreaction. That’s not a micro aggression but I guess people want to be offended about something. I think you just need to slow way down. Every time you send out an email double check the name.
+1. If someone told me that sending an email to the wrong person was a micro-aggression, I’d quietly take note that they were insane and limit future contact.
+2. Two members on my team are both gay, with several other shared characteristics of being men, middle aged, same role, some geolocation. If I mixed up their names or emails does that make me a biased homophobe?
Please, enlighten me.
It sounds like you're just trying to be edgy here. I hope you don't discount the well-documented concept that people struggle with cross-race identification. Look up the cross-race effect.
If it’s normal to struggle with cross race identification, why is it considered a microaggression?
It's common, which exactly is how a microaggression is defined:
Microaggression is a term used for commonplace verbal, behavioral or environmental slights, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative attitudes toward stigmatized or culturally marginalized groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, talk about an overreaction. That’s not a micro aggression but I guess people want to be offended about something. I think you just need to slow way down. Every time you send out an email double check the name.
+1. If someone told me that sending an email to the wrong person was a micro-aggression, I’d quietly take note that they were insane and limit future contact.
+2. Two members on my team are both gay, with several other shared characteristics of being men, middle aged, same role, some geolocation. If I mixed up their names or emails does that make me a biased homophobe?
Please, enlighten me.
It sounds like you're just trying to be edgy here. I hope you don't discount the well-documented concept that people struggle with cross-race identification. Look up the cross-race effect.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, talk about an overreaction. That’s not a micro aggression but I guess people want to be offended about something. I think you just need to slow way down. Every time you send out an email double check the name.
+1. If someone told me that sending an email to the wrong person was a micro-aggression, I’d quietly take note that they were insane and limit future contact.
+2. Two members on my team are both gay, with several other shared characteristics of being men, middle aged, same role, some geolocation. If I mixed up their names or emails does that make me a biased homophobe?
Please, enlighten me.
Wait!! I almost forgot, they are also both white. So am I a homophobe or a racist?!
Well you're a little hysterical so start with that. The OP's manager didn't call her "a racist" lol. Honestly just saying "a racist" is a good way to get labeled as someone to avoid. And the OP didn't mix up emails once, she did it several times.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, talk about an overreaction. That’s not a micro aggression but I guess people want to be offended about something. I think you just need to slow way down. Every time you send out an email double check the name.
+1. If someone told me that sending an email to the wrong person was a micro-aggression, I’d quietly take note that they were insane and limit future contact.
+2. Two members on my team are both gay, with several other shared characteristics of being men, middle aged, same role, some geolocation. If I mixed up their names or emails does that make me a biased homophobe?
Please, enlighten me.
It sounds like you're just trying to be edgy here. I hope you don't discount the well-documented concept that people struggle with cross-race identification. Look up the cross-race effect.
If it’s normal to struggle with cross race identification, why is it considered a microaggression?
Microaggression is a term used for commonplace verbal, behavioral or environmental slights, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative attitudes toward stigmatized or culturally marginalized groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, talk about an overreaction. That’s not a micro aggression but I guess people want to be offended about something. I think you just need to slow way down. Every time you send out an email double check the name.
+1. If someone told me that sending an email to the wrong person was a micro-aggression, I’d quietly take note that they were insane and limit future contact.
+2. Two members on my team are both gay, with several other shared characteristics of being men, middle aged, same role, some geolocation. If I mixed up their names or emails does that make me a biased homophobe?
Please, enlighten me.
It sounds like you're just trying to be edgy here. I hope you don't discount the well-documented concept that people struggle with cross-race identification. Look up the cross-race effect.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, talk about an overreaction. That’s not a micro aggression but I guess people want to be offended about something. I think you just need to slow way down. Every time you send out an email double check the name.
+1. If someone told me that sending an email to the wrong person was a micro-aggression, I’d quietly take note that they were insane and limit future contact.
+2. Two members on my team are both gay, with several other shared characteristics of being men, middle aged, same role, some geolocation. If I mixed up their names or emails does that make me a biased homophobe?
Please, enlighten me.