Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe so many of you think this is ok. You are all sick.

I’m sorry but my body my choice. You don’t get to judge me for choosing to give birth to a girl and caring for her for the next 18+ years.

It may be your choice (though not the choice of the baby you carry apparently) but that doesn’t mean that others don’t get to judge you. You can choose to kill your baby but you don’t get to choose what I think of you for doing that.

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe so many of you think this is ok. You are all sick.

I’m sorry but my body my choice. You don’t get to judge me for choosing to give birth to a girl and caring for her for the next 18+ years.

I cannot believe so many of you think this is ok. You are all sick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If IVF is used to select male offspring, this is highly problematic. We already have too many males and too much toxic masculinity. Plus, it leads to horrible results; just look at all the infanticide going on in China and India.

But I see no problem if it’s used to select daughters.

Just as many are choosing to have boys. Nobody is drowning babies like they did/do in India and China.

Actually the most common form of femicide in these places is sex specific abortion.

Anonymous wrote:There was a rumor that girls with IVF has better birth rate than boys. As families desperately want a baby, I think it may be a factor.

I can't confirm as fact, but I wouldn't be surprised if this were true. Girls are hardier from a medical standpoint in many ways even in utero.

There was a rumor that girls with IVF has better birth rate than boys. As families desperately want a baby, I think it may be a factor.

Anonymous wrote:If IVF is used to select male offspring, this is highly problematic. We already have too many males and too much toxic masculinity. Plus, it leads to horrible results; just look at all the infanticide going on in China and India.

But I see no problem if it’s used to select daughters.

Just as many are choosing to have boys. Nobody is drowning babies like they did/do in India and China.

The one who said the chance of her having a boy is repulsive should not have kids. And she couldn’t have too many relationships with people over the years if she has never met a man who was close to his mother or father.

And Lexi is a complete idiot …

“Boy children tend to be less caring towards their parents,” Lexi explained. “It doesn’t really matter if it’s socialized or biological. It’s probably socialized, but I can’t change all of society.”


I’m sure there are many parents like me who have boys and girls who are all kind, compassionate, empathetic with close relationships with both parents. The girls don’t have a monopoly on those traits.

Anonymous wrote:Boys are ick. Girls are better and more loving.

This is anecdotal but my teen son is far more loving to us than my friends' teen daughters are to them, by their accounts. Imagine that kids turn out the way they do due to a combination of their environment and their own programming - wow!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We would be better off with fewer men. See: crime statistics.

I am reporting these comments about incels and straight up misandry. I really hope karma comes for your children.

You are awful people.

- Mom to an amazing young man.

Whahhhhh. Cry harder no one cares.

We’d be better off without most men. Keep a few around for desirable reproduction, genetic diversity, entertainment and maybe sports, and cull the rest out. We’ll be fine without them.

Society doesn’t owe every incel loser his very own wife or girlfriend anymore.

What would women do in the event of a horrific catastrophe that is way beyond their ability to resolve, like a small spider crawling up a wall?

Good.
The world will be better for it.