Anonymous wrote:BTDT. Clearly you have some options- (1) roll over. They will demand to baptize the kids too, first communion, the whole nine yards. Are you going to be able to stand aside & let them do this, when it is your baby/kid? Try to imagine. Some people can, some can’t. For me, it was out of the question. 2) hold very firm. Will cause problems with the family and your DH will resent you.
As a non religious person who has BTDT with the Catholic relatives and been harped on about religion my whole life I present option 3: take “cover” in some type of liberal church or “church”. A lot of people do this. Find some excuse that you need to be married there and attend there- it is close to your house, you have friends who go there, you love the music program or community service or want to send future kid to their school. Think of something- Literally anything. Get married there, attend services maybe 2 times a year or participate in the volunteer program or whatever. When you have kids do whatever baby blessings or baptism ritual they offer. It provides cover and face saving on the ILs end “welllll at least grand baby is being raised Christian blah blah blah” “wellll at least they are being married in a church” blah blah and your future DH will see it is a compromise. He clearly does not care about religion. Not saying your ILs will exactly love this (they won’t- they want Catholic)- but they will grudgingly accept it.
That is your best choice here…take it from someone who has btdt
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The non-Catholic spouse lying about agreeing to raise your kids to be Catholic is grounds for an invalid marriage. If he marries outside of the church at your beautiful venue without a dispensation, that too would be an invalid marriage. Either way you do it, you guys will not be married in the eyes of the Catholic church. This might not mean anything to you right now, but it is a guarantee that there will be problems in the future. Especially as children start showing up.
You should really, really reconsider getting married to each other. You might think you are in love, but you are not a good fit at all.
The non-Catholic party no longer needs to agree to raise the kids Catholic. The Catholic party has to agree to do their best and there ought to be a founded hope it will occur.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, does your fiance want to raise kids to be Catholic?
OP here. No. He went to church here and there growing up and went to catholic school but he’s not religious. He hasn’t been to church except with in years. We do not plan to raise our kids in any religion.
Have you actually discussed this? He folded pretty quick with pressure from the family.
OP here. He assumed we would get married in a church since everyone he knows has been married in a church. He was shocked when I told him I didn’t want to, and said all of hai family is expecting us to be married in a church.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, does your fiance want to raise kids to be Catholic?
OP here. No. He went to church here and there growing up and went to catholic school but he’s not religious. He hasn’t been to church except with in years. We do not plan to raise our kids in any religion.
Have you actually discussed this? He folded pretty quick with pressure from the family.
OP here. He assumed we would get married in a church since everyone he knows has been married in a church. He was shocked when I told him I didn’t want to, and said all of hai family is expecting us to be married in a church.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, does your fiance want to raise kids to be Catholic?
OP here. No. He went to church here and there growing up and went to catholic school but he’s not religious. He hasn’t been to church except with in years. We do not plan to raise our kids in any religion.
Have you actually discussed this? He folded pretty quick with pressure from the family.
OP here. He assumed we would get married in a church since everyone he knows has been married in a church. He was shocked when I told him I didn’t want to, and said all of hai family is expecting us to be married in a church.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, does your fiance want to raise kids to be Catholic?
OP here. No. He went to church here and there growing up and went to catholic school but he’s not religious. He hasn’t been to church except with in years. We do not plan to raise our kids in any religion.
Have you actually discussed this? He folded pretty quick with pressure from the family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, does your fiance want to raise kids to be Catholic?
OP here. No. He went to church here and there growing up and went to catholic school but he’s not religious. He hasn’t been to church except with in years. We do not plan to raise our kids in any religion.
Anonymous wrote:Op, does your fiance want to raise kids to be Catholic?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You both don't need to be Catholic. One of you should be and also registered at the church or a church that his family is registered at. You can't just waltz into any church and demand a wedding ceremony. You will need to be registered parishioners, or use his family church, and complete the wedding prep (Pre-Cana), and just jump through all the hoops.
But your post is very off putting all about you, and what you want. You're supposed to be getting married, it's not all about you.
No. One of them must be Catholic to be married in a Catholic church.
Well, the fiancé is. But the point in this case is that the fiancé is Catholic enough to meet the criteria. But he is not practicing and might say he's not Catholic. But if he was raised Catholic he's been baptized, had his Communion and is confirmed. As far as the Church is concerned, he's Catholic.
Yes, the fiancé is Catholic. The point you’re ignoring is the first pp said one should be Catholic. There’s no should about it with the Catholic church. That’s a must.
I said that. Then I clarified. I said "should" because most people getting married in the Church are there because they want to be, they are in good standing. The fiancé is Catholic, being born and raised, but seems now to be lapsed. If you're lapsed should you still consider yourself Catholic?
You are making zero sense. There is no should about it with a Catholic wedding. It’s a must or there’s no Catholic wedding.
He is a Catholic in the eyes of the church. We know this. But, how he identifies is another thing. Which goes back to OP's point that should they just go along with it for appeasement or is it a mockery? They can have the Catholic wedding, but should they?
That’s all that matters if he wants to be married in a Catholic church. What’s a mockery is OP’s suggestion of lying.
You act as if it's so easy to get married in the church. An indifferent, non-practicing couple still has to meet certain criteria. Maybe it's church attendance, pre-cana, meetings with the priest, good standing, before they will be allowed to book their date. It varies. It's not just "does the one person meet the basic criteria". Sounds like they already have a date and venue for their non religious wedding. Trying to plan a Catholic ceremony into an existing timeline might be a huge hurdle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You both don't need to be Catholic. One of you should be and also registered at the church or a church that his family is registered at. You can't just waltz into any church and demand a wedding ceremony. You will need to be registered parishioners, or use his family church, and complete the wedding prep (Pre-Cana), and just jump through all the hoops.
But your post is very off putting all about you, and what you want. You're supposed to be getting married, it's not all about you.
No. One of them must be Catholic to be married in a Catholic church.
Well, the fiancé is. But the point in this case is that the fiancé is Catholic enough to meet the criteria. But he is not practicing and might say he's not Catholic. But if he was raised Catholic he's been baptized, had his Communion and is confirmed. As far as the Church is concerned, he's Catholic.
Yes, the fiancé is Catholic. The point you’re ignoring is the first pp said one should be Catholic. There’s no should about it with the Catholic church. That’s a must.
I said that. Then I clarified. I said "should" because most people getting married in the Church are there because they want to be, they are in good standing. The fiancé is Catholic, being born and raised, but seems now to be lapsed. If you're lapsed should you still consider yourself Catholic?
You are making zero sense. There is no should about it with a Catholic wedding. It’s a must or there’s no Catholic wedding.
He is a Catholic in the eyes of the church. We know this. But, how he identifies is another thing. Which goes back to OP's point that should they just go along with it for appeasement or is it a mockery? They can have the Catholic wedding, but should they?
That’s all that matters if he wants to be married in a Catholic church. What’s a mockery is OP’s suggestion of lying.
Anonymous wrote:The marriage should center around the couple and their beliefs. If he’s pushing for a church wedding for his family, I’m sure a baptism will follow.
Anonymous wrote:The non-Catholic spouse lying about agreeing to raise your kids to be Catholic is grounds for an invalid marriage. If he marries outside of the church at your beautiful venue without a dispensation, that too would be an invalid marriage. Either way you do it, you guys will not be married in the eyes of the Catholic church. This might not mean anything to you right now, but it is a guarantee that there will be problems in the future. Especially as children start showing up.
You should really, really reconsider getting married to each other. You might think you are in love, but you are not a good fit at all.