Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not the intelligence, it’s something else. In a school with more smart kids it probably wouldn’t happen. Or he might be bragging or talking too much in class.
He stopped talking two years ago and has made great social strides since then. They're literally looking over his shoulder and seeing his grades when tests/homework are returned.
Anonymous wrote:Just wondering. 11 yo DS is constantly made fun of, and I'm curious if/when this gets better.
Anonymous wrote:The parents saying that being smart has never been a social liability have ZERO experience in a school where success in school is not valued by the majority of the school population. This was certainly the case during my schooling. It was socially encouraged not to “try” in class. To try or to be smart was being a swot, stuck up or a teachers pet. I learned to lie about my grades and the amount of time I’d spent on homework. I’d tell my peers I’d failed a test or got low marks on an assignment so that I was more socially accepted. In a school where kids don’t value success it is ABSOLUTELY a social liability to be smart.
Fortunately my kids have not experienced this and are both in very academically focused programs where doing well is socially encouraged and rewarded.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The parents saying that being smart has never been a social liability have ZERO experience in a school where success in school is not valued by the majority of the school population. This was certainly the case during my schooling. It was socially encouraged not to “try” in class. To try or to be smart was being a swot, stuck up or a teachers pet. I learned to lie about my grades and the amount of time I’d spent on homework. I’d tell my peers I’d failed a test or got low marks on an assignment so that I was more socially accepted. In a school where kids don’t value success it is ABSOLUTELY a social liability to be smart.
Fortunately my kids have not experienced this and are both in very academically focused programs where doing well is socially encouraged and rewarded.
NP, I don't doubt that these environments exist. I am puzzled that educated parents would put their academically smart willingly into one.
Anonymous wrote:The parents saying that being smart has never been a social liability have ZERO experience in a school where success in school is not valued by the majority of the school population. This was certainly the case during my schooling. It was socially encouraged not to “try” in class. To try or to be smart was being a swot, stuck up or a teachers pet. I learned to lie about my grades and the amount of time I’d spent on homework. I’d tell my peers I’d failed a test or got low marks on an assignment so that I was more socially accepted. In a school where kids don’t value success it is ABSOLUTELY a social liability to be smart.
Fortunately my kids have not experienced this and are both in very academically focused programs where doing well is socially encouraged and rewarded.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not the intelligence, it’s something else. In a school with more smart kids it probably wouldn’t happen. Or he might be bragging or talking too much in class.
Anonymous wrote:Just wondering. 11 yo DS is constantly made fun of, and I'm curious if/when this gets better.
Anonymous wrote:My WISC score was 142 according to my parents. I always had the highest grades in es. No one ever made fun of me for it.
I’m not saying no one made fun of your son for it, but I would guess that there is something else going on—most likely social skills that are not at par. But it could be anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being smart is not a liability. It is how you carry yourself. For boys, athleticism often has the most social capital. I have one boy in middle and high school. We live in an area with a well educated population so many parents from top universities. No one is teasing anyone for being smart. The most popular boys are often rich, good looking, athletic and also smart.
This is part of the issue - he plays golf and swims, though neither are school sports. His classmates all play football and make fun of him for not doing so.
But we do not live in a highly educated area anymore.
You move to Texas? Lol.
Maybe he loves those things but maybe you need to help him diversify his activities away from all the preppy stuff. I doubt it's just his 'smarts' but the whole package.
I went to college with a competitive tennis player from Texas who said tennis was such a big deal in his town it was like Friday Night Lights! Everyone cared about it. I'm sure they cared about football, too. The town was probably obsessed with all sports.
I realize this is an irrelevant comment but just wanted to share that weird nugget!
Anonymous wrote:High achievers are not necessarily cool at my kids’ school. Which is very different than my own high school experience. The coolest kids at my kid’s school will likely go on to community college.
So there’s that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being smart is not a liability. It is how you carry yourself. For boys, athleticism often has the most social capital. I have one boy in middle and high school. We live in an area with a well educated population so many parents from top universities. No one is teasing anyone for being smart. The most popular boys are often rich, good looking, athletic and also smart.
Right out of a teen movie that’s fantasy. Kids don’t give a shit where parents went to school. Athletic does not automatically go with smart, usually doesn’t.
There are too many of those parents in the DC that are socially awkward, nerdy and not all that good looking. But according to you they all produce good looking athletic smart kids. Right
Help this makes no sense.
Really? You can't understand that, for example, kids in a place like West Texas are encouraged to play football because it's their only shot at college, both academically and financially? Not every school attracts good-looking, all-American lax players with blonde girlfriends.