Anonymous wrote:This kid should not have a smartphone or any other electronics. No need for headphones if he has nothing to listen to. He can have the most basic dumb phone only for emergencies. That’s it.
Can you explain what is hard about that decision? It honestly seems so obvious to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am baffled by the parents who think the teacher should come up with an idea to redirect their child. This is lazy-a$$ parenting. In an earlier post, I recommended you spend a few days in school with your child. If they act like a 3 year old, treat them that way.
Pp here asking for solutions. Are you an educator who has honestly seen this work?
It’s been my experience that the school will not allow me to do this.
.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The calls we received were from 3 separate teachers over 1.5 years. They all had the same theme- messing around, not paying attention, ignoring directions, talking, distracted. He is also not failing, he is a B/C student and got a D in chemistry. I don't think the situation is as dire as some PP's interpreted it to be.
We have since installed an app that allows us to lock down his phone and monitor everything.
I agree with everyone about possible ADHD or depression.
If he has a VPN installed already, that means he know how to work any apps that allows you to "locK and monitor everything" on the phone. VPNs pretty much bypass that. Believe me I learned that while trying to "supervise" our teens activity online.
Also, if I had 3 calls from 3 different teachers I would not only take away the phone completely but I would be calling the school and requesting a meeting with the counselor and my kid.
Unless your kid has had a history of not following directions and being disruptive, do not confuse plain bad behavior with ADHD or depression.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the obvious solution is to take away the phone, why doesn’t the teacher just say that? “Because of this, your son is no longer allowed to have a phone in school.”
Or
“I recommend that you don’t allow your son to bring his phone to school.”
Maybe it should be obvious to the parents, but maybe it isn’t for whatever reason?
What’s the point of being coy?
Teachers are usually advised not to comment on parenting. That’s a great way for us to get complaints filed with administrators. Many of us also aren’t allowed to place limits either, like saying the child can’t bring the phone.
This really is on the parent and the child to figure out.
I’m really just trying to figure this out. It seems crazy that you can see an obvious solution to a problem at school, but you aren’t allowed to tell the parents what it is.
And this isn’t parenting. This is classroom management.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the obvious solution is to take away the phone, why doesn’t the teacher just say that? “Because of this, your son is no longer allowed to have a phone in school.”
Or
“I recommend that you don’t allow your son to bring his phone to school.”
Maybe it should be obvious to the parents, but maybe it isn’t for whatever reason?
What’s the point of being coy?
Teachers are usually advised not to comment on parenting. That’s a great way for us to get complaints filed with administrators. Many of us also aren’t allowed to place limits either, like saying the child can’t bring the phone.
This really is on the parent and the child to figure out.
Anonymous wrote:If the obvious solution is to take away the phone, why doesn’t the teacher just say that? “Because of this, your son is no longer allowed to have a phone in school.”
Or
“I recommend that you don’t allow your son to bring his phone to school.”
Maybe it should be obvious to the parents, but maybe it isn’t for whatever reason?
What’s the point of being coy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the obvious solution is to take away the phone, why doesn’t the teacher just say that? “Because of this, your son is no longer allowed to have a phone in school.”
Or
“I recommend that you don’t allow your son to bring his phone to school.”
Maybe it should be obvious to the parents, but maybe it isn’t for whatever reason?
What’s the point of being coy?
The teacher did! We can’t say he isn’t allowed to have it at school because factually, according to school rules, he is. The teacher recommended him not bringing the phone to school. OP is convinced she can’t take it because there could be a school shooting though.
Anonymous wrote:If the obvious solution is to take away the phone, why doesn’t the teacher just say that? “Because of this, your son is no longer allowed to have a phone in school.”
Or
“I recommend that you don’t allow your son to bring his phone to school.”
Maybe it should be obvious to the parents, but maybe it isn’t for whatever reason?
What’s the point of being coy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how parents these days can twist any situation to place the blame on the teachers. Good luck in college!
Are college professors going to call parents about a college student’s behavior?
Here is a pro tip: teachers DO NOT want to call you. If we are calling it is because your kid is doing something that ultimately negatively impacts their own academics and if it looks like your kid might fail because of it, we are required to contact you. If it gets to the point we are calling, when we do not want to have to do that, it means we have exhausted all the interventions, redirections, strategies available to us as the teacher and it’s now at a level where YOU, the parent, who has more available interventions and strategies to use with your child that we do not, need to be aware and taking action.
Don’t get annoyed that we’re calling you. Understand that it means we have absolutely done what we can on our end and it’s now time for you to pick up the baton. Or, failing that, at least you have been made aware so that when your kid ultimately does get that F, you can’t claim “nobody told me” and blame us for not telling you so you could help.
+1. Is this public or private school? If it’s public and the teacher is calling you whatever they are telling you about his behavior is probably a thousand times worse. Not to mention that his behavior is disruptive to other students who actually want to learn. I have a teen and tween and they both have phones. I’ve never had an issue with behavior. In fact, I have had teachers reach out to me tell me that they enjoy having my kids in their classes. The difference? My kids would have lost all phone privileges for a month after the first phone call. They know very well that if their grades drop or if they cause any kind of disruption in the classroom the phones are gone. I use parental controls consistently. I monitor screen time consistently. I review grades consistently. I review homework consistently. Do your job and parent.
Anonymous wrote:I am baffled by the parents who think the teacher should come up with an idea to redirect their child. This is lazy-a$$ parenting. In an earlier post, I recommended you spend a few days in school with your child. If they act like a 3 year old, treat them that way.
Anonymous wrote:This is OP. We are in public and not MCPS. Our school allows phones, but they need to be put away.
I wouldn't want to take the phone because if there is a school shooting, I don't want to be in that position. The unfortunate mindset of a public school parent, unfortunately.
Thank you to everyone who suggested a dummy phone or a text/call phone only. I think we're going to start here.
How do we get him to understand how rude this behavior is? Grades are grades, he will pass or fail, but we want to make sure he is a good human.