Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Out of curiousity, UVA's is so much higher than when the University of California system used to use the SAT. For example, at UC Irvine, the 25% SAT was 1190!!! It shows how strong UVA is compared to the other publics, especially low SAT ones like Michigan.
Low SAT Michigan? Not.
Anonymous wrote:Out of curiousity, UVA's is so much higher than when the University of California system used to use the SAT. For example, at UC Irvine, the 25% SAT was 1190!!! It shows how strong UVA is compared to the other publics, especially low SAT ones like Michigan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Out of curiousity, UVA's is so much higher than when the University of California system used to use the SAT. For example, at UC Irvine, the 25% SAT was 1190!!! It shows how strong UVA is compared to the other publics, especially low SAT ones like Michigan.
It shows how selective UVA is. UC has really built out and democratized their system. UVA remains a small snob school.
I don't know what that means The data shows definitively that SAT scores correlate to student outcomes. UVA's SAT scores are far higher than the mid UC's (or at least when the UC's used them).That tells me UVA is better!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's become a bit of a disgusting game. The test isn't about knowledge, it's about who paid most to retake over and over again to get absolute top scores. It weeds out a lot of kids who could absolutely do just as well at competitive schools.
retaking the test over and over (people usually only do 1 or 2) doesn't give you *that* big of a bump.
Regardless, some of the top colleges are finding that SAT scores in conjunction with grades are a better predictor of success in college than just grades (inflated more often than not) alone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1560 and still got rejected from Harvard and Penn![/quote
There's more to an application than a test score.
What is there? Good Gpa they have it
Anonymous wrote:1560 and still got rejected from Harvard and Penn!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Out of curiousity, UVA's is so much higher than when the University of California system used to use the SAT. For example, at UC Irvine, the 25% SAT was 1190!!! It shows how strong UVA is compared to the other publics, especially low SAT ones like Michigan.
It shows how selective UVA is. UC has really built out and democratized their system. UVA remains a small snob school.
I don't know what that means The data shows definitively that SAT scores correlate to student outcomes. UVA's SAT scores are far higher than the mid UC's (or at least when the UC's used them).That tells me UVA is better!
UVA is "better" relatively to the lower tiered UCs. Congrats?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Out of curiousity, UVA's is so much higher than when the University of California system used to use the SAT. For example, at UC Irvine, the 25% SAT was 1190!!! It shows how strong UVA is compared to the other publics, especially low SAT ones like Michigan.
It shows how selective UVA is. UC has really built out and democratized their system. UVA remains a small snob school.
I don't know what that means The data shows definitively that SAT scores correlate to student outcomes. UVA's SAT scores are far higher than the mid UC's (or at least when the UC's used them).That tells me UVA is better!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Out of curiousity, UVA's is so much higher than when the University of California system used to use the SAT. For example, at UC Irvine, the 25% SAT was 1190!!! It shows how strong UVA is compared to the other publics, especially low SAT ones like Michigan.
It shows how selective UVA is. UC has really built out and democratized their system. UVA remains a small snob school.
Anonymous wrote:Out of curiousity, UVA's is so much higher than when the University of California system used to use the SAT. For example, at UC Irvine, the 25% SAT was 1190!!! It shows how strong UVA is compared to the other publics, especially low SAT ones like Michigan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1590 - went to UMD. Rejected from MIT.
1580 also rejected from MIT. They did get an interview, though. Also rejected from Mich and GAtech.
CS major, male at UMD now with merit.
Anonymous wrote:1590 - went to UMD. Rejected from MIT.