Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, it might be that you are working to create the family you always imaginesd, rather than accepting the family you have. Perhaps. You are trying for 2 ordinary children rather than accepting that your 2 current children will be ordinary-enough.
+1
Op has 2 kids but wishes they were 2 NT kids.
Also, who wishes any sort of difficulty on their children? Yah, if I could take away my child’s developmental disability and the struggles it causes them in life and their relationships, I would. Your shaming is ridiculous.
I'm not shaming you for having a SN child. I'm shaming for wanting an additional "normal" child, instead of caring for the SN ones you have. It doesnt sound like your DH was on the same page, or at least you conveniently failed to mention that until now. You want to replace your Sn child with another NT child to complete your family the way you pictured. Life doesnt always work out like that.
That’s not it at all. I always wanted three kids. My husband was open to it until we had two. He is still open to it but would prefer not to have another.
Unless you have a kid with special needs, I don’t think you can relate to the unique concerns that parents in my position unfortunately have to face. Fortunately my son’s special needs are fairly mild in that he “only” has (pretty severe) adhd, but overall kids with his profile are more prone to other mental health issues and things that I absolutely fear down the road. Yes, in general I think that for a NT child whose sibling has a disability, it is nice for them to also have a NT sibling because it can be a very isolating experience. obviously there is no guarantee of that. You have no idea what it’s like to be a child in a house with a sibling who has a disability or neurological disorder. You seemingly don’t know what it’s like to parent a child with a disability and to have to think about very frightening prospects. I wouldn’t wish this particular consideration on anyone. And to accuse me of wanting a NT child to replace my ND is just disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself and should refrain judgement until you’ve walked a mile in a special needs family’s shoes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, it might be that you are working to create the family you always imaginesd, rather than accepting the family you have. Perhaps. You are trying for 2 ordinary children rather than accepting that your 2 current children will be ordinary-enough.
+1
Op has 2 kids but wishes they were 2 NT kids.
Also, who wishes any sort of difficulty on their children? Yah, if I could take away my child’s developmental disability and the struggles it causes them in life and their relationships, I would. Your shaming is ridiculous.
I'm not shaming you for having a SN child. I'm shaming for wanting an additional "normal" child, instead of caring for the SN ones you have. It doesnt sound like your DH was on the same page, or at least you conveniently failed to mention that until now. You want to replace your Sn child with another NT child to complete your family the way you pictured. Life doesnt always work out like that.
That’s not it at all. I always wanted three kids. My husband was open to it until we had two. He is still open to it but would prefer not to have another.
Unless you have a kid with special needs, I don’t think you can relate to the unique concerns that parents in my position unfortunately have to face. Fortunately my son’s special needs are fairly mild in that he “only” has (pretty severe) adhd, but overall kids with his profile are more prone to other mental health issues and things that I absolutely fear down the road. Yes, in general I think that for a NT child whose sibling has a disability, it is nice for them to also have a NT sibling because it can be a very isolating experience. obviously there is no guarantee of that. You have no idea what it’s like to be a child in a house with a sibling who has a disability or neurological disorder. You seemingly don’t know what it’s like to parent a child with a disability and to have to think about very frightening prospects. I wouldn’t wish this particular consideration on anyone. And to accuse me of wanting a NT child to replace my ND is just disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself and should refrain judgement until you’ve walked a mile in a special needs family’s shoes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, it might be that you are working to create the family you always imaginesd, rather than accepting the family you have. Perhaps. You are trying for 2 ordinary children rather than accepting that your 2 current children will be ordinary-enough.
+1
Op has 2 kids but wishes they were 2 NT kids.
Also, who wishes any sort of difficulty on their children? Yah, if I could take away my child’s developmental disability and the struggles it causes them in life and their relationships, I would. Your shaming is ridiculous.
OP, I am sorry people are saying these rude things to you. People without a SN child cannot know what it is and can be very judgmental and harsh. I have been where you sit and thought about a third for very similar reasons. We ended up not going for it, and I am happy with our choice.
Thanks. Can I ask why you’re happy and don’t regret it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DH was the same as yours and said he'd do it b/c he didn't want me to resent him and we went for it. And our 3rd is an absolutely gem and we both agree probably our "best" child.
But he absolutely resents the situation overall - that 3 are really tough to manage in long stretches for 1 adult (when they're little for safety and ability to meet everyone's different developmental needs, when they're older for logistics) so we are now basically both on all the time except when we're working. We don't have family close by and neither of our parents can handle 3 when they visit so there is no hope for getting a weekend away from the kids for years. Its harder to find a babysitter that can manage 3 to get out. Its harder to find schools or activities that meet the needs of all 3 so you end up needing 2 adults for drop offs and pick-ups and activities.
We throw an insane amount of money at help to make it doable in an enjoyable. Of course it's doable without that - but the families i see doing it are stretched very thin without a moment to be a person other than "employee" and "parent". And by middle / high school everyone I know with 3 has 2 adults shuttling kids around - whether the 2nd one is both spouses worker shorter hours, hired, or family. Of course you can skip activities - but are you going to want to?
Some people should not have children.
FFS I mean easiest the way everyone fawns over 'easy" sleepers / eaters / travelers etc. I'm not calling one of my kids actually better than the other
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, it might be that you are working to create the family you always imaginesd, rather than accepting the family you have. Perhaps. You are trying for 2 ordinary children rather than accepting that your 2 current children will be ordinary-enough.
+1
Op has 2 kids but wishes they were 2 NT kids.
Also, who wishes any sort of difficulty on their children? Yah, if I could take away my child’s developmental disability and the struggles it causes them in life and their relationships, I would. Your shaming is ridiculous.
I'm not shaming you for having a SN child. I'm shaming for wanting an additional "normal" child, instead of caring for the SN ones you have. It doesnt sound like your DH was on the same page, or at least you conveniently failed to mention that until now. You want to replace your Sn child with another NT child to complete your family the way you pictured. Life doesnt always work out like that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DH was the same as yours and said he'd do it b/c he didn't want me to resent him and we went for it. And our 3rd is an absolutely gem and we both agree probably our "best" child.
But he absolutely resents the situation overall - that 3 are really tough to manage in long stretches for 1 adult (when they're little for safety and ability to meet everyone's different developmental needs, when they're older for logistics) so we are now basically both on all the time except when we're working. We don't have family close by and neither of our parents can handle 3 when they visit so there is no hope for getting a weekend away from the kids for years. Its harder to find a babysitter that can manage 3 to get out. Its harder to find schools or activities that meet the needs of all 3 so you end up needing 2 adults for drop offs and pick-ups and activities.
We throw an insane amount of money at help to make it doable in an enjoyable. Of course it's doable without that - but the families i see doing it are stretched very thin without a moment to be a person other than "employee" and "parent". And by middle / high school everyone I know with 3 has 2 adults shuttling kids around - whether the 2nd one is both spouses worker shorter hours, hired, or family. Of course you can skip activities - but are you going to want to?
The bolded sentiment is revolting to me. Ugh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DH was the same as yours and said he'd do it b/c he didn't want me to resent him and we went for it. And our 3rd is an absolutely gem and we both agree probably our "best" child.
But he absolutely resents the situation overall - that 3 are really tough to manage in long stretches for 1 adult (when they're little for safety and ability to meet everyone's different developmental needs, when they're older for logistics) so we are now basically both on all the time except when we're working. We don't have family close by and neither of our parents can handle 3 when they visit so there is no hope for getting a weekend away from the kids for years. Its harder to find a babysitter that can manage 3 to get out. Its harder to find schools or activities that meet the needs of all 3 so you end up needing 2 adults for drop offs and pick-ups and activities.
We throw an insane amount of money at help to make it doable in an enjoyable. Of course it's doable without that - but the families i see doing it are stretched very thin without a moment to be a person other than "employee" and "parent". And by middle / high school everyone I know with 3 has 2 adults shuttling kids around - whether the 2nd one is both spouses worker shorter hours, hired, or family. Of course you can skip activities - but are you going to want to?
Some people should not have children.
FFS I mean easiest the way everyone fawns over 'easy" sleepers / eaters / travelers etc. I'm not calling one of my kids actually better than the other
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DH was the same as yours and said he'd do it b/c he didn't want me to resent him and we went for it. And our 3rd is an absolutely gem and we both agree probably our "best" child.
But he absolutely resents the situation overall - that 3 are really tough to manage in long stretches for 1 adult (when they're little for safety and ability to meet everyone's different developmental needs, when they're older for logistics) so we are now basically both on all the time except when we're working. We don't have family close by and neither of our parents can handle 3 when they visit so there is no hope for getting a weekend away from the kids for years. Its harder to find a babysitter that can manage 3 to get out. Its harder to find schools or activities that meet the needs of all 3 so you end up needing 2 adults for drop offs and pick-ups and activities.
We throw an insane amount of money at help to make it doable in an enjoyable. Of course it's doable without that - but the families i see doing it are stretched very thin without a moment to be a person other than "employee" and "parent". And by middle / high school everyone I know with 3 has 2 adults shuttling kids around - whether the 2nd one is both spouses worker shorter hours, hired, or family. Of course you can skip activities - but are you going to want to?
Some people should not have children.
Anonymous wrote:My DH was the same as yours and said he'd do it b/c he didn't want me to resent him and we went for it. And our 3rd is an absolutely gem and we both agree probably our "best" child.
But he absolutely resents the situation overall - that 3 are really tough to manage in long stretches for 1 adult (when they're little for safety and ability to meet everyone's different developmental needs, when they're older for logistics) so we are now basically both on all the time except when we're working. We don't have family close by and neither of our parents can handle 3 when they visit so there is no hope for getting a weekend away from the kids for years. Its harder to find a babysitter that can manage 3 to get out. Its harder to find schools or activities that meet the needs of all 3 so you end up needing 2 adults for drop offs and pick-ups and activities.
We throw an insane amount of money at help to make it doable in an enjoyable. Of course it's doable without that - but the families i see doing it are stretched very thin without a moment to be a person other than "employee" and "parent". And by middle / high school everyone I know with 3 has 2 adults shuttling kids around - whether the 2nd one is both spouses worker shorter hours, hired, or family. Of course you can skip activities - but are you going to want to?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DH was the same as yours and said he'd do it b/c he didn't want me to resent him and we went for it. And our 3rd is an absolutely gem and we both agree probably our "best" child.
But he absolutely resents the situation overall - that 3 are really tough to manage in long stretches for 1 adult (when they're little for safety and ability to meet everyone's different developmental needs, when they're older for logistics) so we are now basically both on all the time except when we're working. We don't have family close by and neither of our parents can handle 3 when they visit so there is no hope for getting a weekend away from the kids for years. Its harder to find a babysitter that can manage 3 to get out. Its harder to find schools or activities that meet the needs of all 3 so you end up needing 2 adults for drop offs and pick-ups and activities.
We throw an insane amount of money at help to make it doable in an enjoyable. Of course it's doable without that - but the families i see doing it are stretched very thin without a moment to be a person other than "employee" and "parent". And by middle / high school everyone I know with 3 has 2 adults shuttling kids around - whether the 2nd one is both spouses worker shorter hours, hired, or family. Of course you can skip activities - but are you going to want to?
The bolded sentiment is revolting to me. Ugh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You try for the family you want around your dinner table in 10 years. Newborn stage is a blip in the grand scheme.
This. My DH told me the same thing as yours. « Not my choice but I don’t want you to be unhappy so will follow if it is essential to you ». At the time (at 36 with 2 kids and some frozen embryos) I reluctantly gave up because I was afraid that financially it would be too much for us and would then create tensions in our marriage (DH didn’t care about financial stress but I knew it would impact our relationship to be more limited in our freedom).
Fast forward to now. I am 42, our financial lives has improved a lot (as could be expected but I was being conservative in my hopes). But now DH is 100% out as he feels exhausted and is too happy to not deal with young toddlers anymore.
And I really miss that 3rd one. Reading your post I really want to jump in your shoes and have the rambunctious bigger family I always thought I would have…
I will add one reality check : I also know that my life is easier than the life of my friends with 3. None of us are SAHM. But my house is calmer, cleaner, more organized, I have more time, I am more on top of things and I have more discretionary income to solve annoyances with money (cleaners, direct flights, tutors etc…), they are more harried. I still envy them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, it might be that you are working to create the family you always imaginesd, rather than accepting the family you have. Perhaps. You are trying for 2 ordinary children rather than accepting that your 2 current children will be ordinary-enough.
+1
Op has 2 kids but wishes they were 2 NT kids.
Also, who wishes any sort of difficulty on their children? Yah, if I could take away my child’s developmental disability and the struggles it causes them in life and their relationships, I would. Your shaming is ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:My DH was the same as yours and said he'd do it b/c he didn't want me to resent him and we went for it. And our 3rd is an absolutely gem and we both agree probably our "best" child.
But he absolutely resents the situation overall - that 3 are really tough to manage in long stretches for 1 adult (when they're little for safety and ability to meet everyone's different developmental needs, when they're older for logistics) so we are now basically both on all the time except when we're working. We don't have family close by and neither of our parents can handle 3 when they visit so there is no hope for getting a weekend away from the kids for years. Its harder to find a babysitter that can manage 3 to get out. Its harder to find schools or activities that meet the needs of all 3 so you end up needing 2 adults for drop offs and pick-ups and activities.
We throw an insane amount of money at help to make it doable in an enjoyable. Of course it's doable without that - but the families i see doing it are stretched very thin without a moment to be a person other than "employee" and "parent". And by middle / high school everyone I know with 3 has 2 adults shuttling kids around - whether the 2nd one is both spouses worker shorter hours, hired, or family. Of course you can skip activities - but are you going to want to?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would go for a third in your situation. I am the middle child of three and am so happy that my parents had my younger sister.
Interesting, our middle child resents her younger sister “replacing” her as youngest. But we have a big age gap of 5 years, how big is yours?
DP. My middle sister resented me and wasn’t nice to me. Still isn’t. Sucks
Anonymous wrote:My DH was the same as yours and said he'd do it b/c he didn't want me to resent him and we went for it. And our 3rd is an absolutely gem and we both agree probably our "best" child.
But he absolutely resents the situation overall - that 3 are really tough to manage in long stretches for 1 adult (when they're little for safety and ability to meet everyone's different developmental needs, when they're older for logistics) so we are now basically both on all the time except when we're working. We don't have family close by and neither of our parents can handle 3 when they visit so there is no hope for getting a weekend away from the kids for years. Its harder to find a babysitter that can manage 3 to get out. Its harder to find schools or activities that meet the needs of all 3 so you end up needing 2 adults for drop offs and pick-ups and activities.
We throw an insane amount of money at help to make it doable in an enjoyable. Of course it's doable without that - but the families i see doing it are stretched very thin without a moment to be a person other than "employee" and "parent". And by middle / high school everyone I know with 3 has 2 adults shuttling kids around - whether the 2nd one is both spouses worker shorter hours, hired, or family. Of course you can skip activities - but are you going to want to?