Anonymous wrote:I tend to think there is no way a scammer like this would take the chance and show up IN PERSON. There is a reason why they usually want you to wire $ or send gift cards. Otherwise, it is too risky. Cameras are everywhere.
Also, she seems to recall the exact conversation REALLY well. I agree with pp that suggests she made this up for a book deal...with her connections, she will get it.
If it did happen, on the other hand, what I do not get is this...I understand people falling for scams when pressured to make a split second decision to send money or divulge info. However, this journalist walked to her neighborhood bank branch, stood in line, walked back, boxed the money, etc. Easily at least 30-40 minutes of time where she was alone with her thoughts, without the crook breathing down her neck pressuring her, giving her time to reflect on the situation. And she still went through with it, supposedly. Not to mention that she clearly is clueless about our government; that particularly three-letter agency would not be involved in an investigation like that. That is something your average high-schooler knows just from watching movies with law enforcement characters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
super easy to rag on this woman -
but my own husband fell for one of these online scams in a bad moment. ended up buying a couple thousand dollars in gift cards, made a couple of bank transfers - finally i realized what was happening and literally hung up his phone. but it was insane - it was just insane. i couldn't believe it happened.
luckily it wasn't $50k - gd forbid! - but it was a couple thousand dollars. i am still really shaken up that he fell for this - and it did make me worry that any of us could be vulnerable to something like this if it's the right scam at the wrong moment.
all that said - i don't see how this person can be a financial advice journalist after this!
i do think she'll get a book deal worth more than $50k.
Your husband never, ever did anything to hint that he was vulnerable to this? And wasn't being blackmailed for naughty behavior?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PSA: Victims of Fraud are no longer able to deduct the loss on their taxes. (Related to the article, she makes mention of this and I hope her CPA was aware of the change because otherwise she’s going to have another problem)
The 2017 Trump Era Tax cuts removed ability to offset phishing/fraud on your taxes. There have been multiple stories recently of people who gave their tax deferred accounts to scammers and now owe hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes to the IRS.
Someone mentioned this in the comments to the article and the author got really defensive and said she’s writing it off as a casualty loss, not a theft loss. Seems like a bit of a loophole if she’s able to do it.
So if I understand, she was planning on paying this $50k to the IRS. Instead, she gives it to scammers. She’s able to deduct the loss from her taxes, thereby lowering her taxes. So if effect, she’s sort of whole, no?