Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My MIL was young and not working when we had our twins but her help had strings attached. Basically if she helped us the our twins, then we owed her to ‘take care of her’ when she got old and was no longer independent!
Yeah, that’s kind of how it’s supposed to work. My dad jokes with my kids “I changed your diapers, and someday you can help change my diapers”.
Sorry I’m not changing my MIL’s diapers because she came to visit to help with the kids when they were little!
And here it is - why the older generation isn’t biting. They know it’s not going to be reciprocated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i have been confused for a while by this notion that boomer parents have of like - your kids, we have zero responsibility to help.
Like - ok you CAN take that pov, but then why did you have kids if you only wanted to help them for 18 years?
I have been very confused for a while by this notion that millennial kids are owed a support for life, and the only reason for their parents’ existence is to provide that support. Why did you have kids if you can’t manage being a parent?
Multi-generational help is not a new concept. And something that’s still practiced by many traditional cultures around the world. What IS new is grandparents refusing to help out or be involved with their grandkids lives in a meaningful way.
PP. Do tell me about multi-generational stuff - I am an immigrant and I am very familiar with it, the good and the bad. I can assure you that help never flows in only one direction - before your parents contribute to raising your children, you are expected to pitch in helping them deal with your grandparents or great grandparents. How do you like to skip your weekly brunch because there is no one to watch over the grandma?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i have been confused for a while by this notion that boomer parents have of like - your kids, we have zero responsibility to help.
Like - ok you CAN take that pov, but then why did you have kids if you only wanted to help them for 18 years?
How old were your parents when you had kids?
It’s the Gen X or whatever who have been having babies much later than other generations that will have it tough. If you have a baby at 40 years old and then your child has a baby at 35 years old the grandmother would be 75 already.
Different poster here.
I am Gen X (born in 75) and had my first kid at 24. My mom was 51 when my baby (her first grandchild) was born.
Nope. I was 27 with my oldest. Same with nearly everyone one I know from college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i have been confused for a while by this notion that boomer parents have of like - your kids, we have zero responsibility to help.
Like - ok you CAN take that pov, but then why did you have kids if you only wanted to help them for 18 years?
How old were your parents when you had kids?
It’s the Gen X or whatever who have been having babies much later than other generations that will have it tough. If you have a baby at 40 years old and then your child has a baby at 35 years old the grandmother would be 75 already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i have been confused for a while by this notion that boomer parents have of like - your kids, we have zero responsibility to help.
Like - ok you CAN take that pov, but then why did you have kids if you only wanted to help them for 18 years?
How old were your parents when you had kids?
It’s the Gen X or whatever who have been having babies much later than other generations that will have it tough. If you have a baby at 40 years old and then your child has a baby at 35 years old the grandmother would be 75 already.
Different poster here.
I am Gen X (born in 75) and had my first kid at 24. My mom was 51 when my baby (her first grandchild) was born.
Nope. I was 27 with my oldest. Same with nearly everyone one I know from college.
Anonymous wrote:It's weird to me this became a thread about attacking generations. This doesn't feel like a generational issue. It's family to family. My Boomer parents had ZERO help from their parents, and honestly could have used it. I know plenty of Boomer parents who help a lot. It's not generational.
I also think everyone is assuming "help" means direct childcare. Yes that can obviously be nice but I think there are many ways families can support one another.
We're talking about mothers who are on antidepressants. I can think of dozens of things parents could do to support a person struggling with mental health other than babysitting her kids. Being a good listener. Offer encouragement and moral support. Also even childcare doesn't have to mean being Nanny Grandma. It could mean keeping an eye on the kids while Mom makes dinner, or just developing a relationship with the kids so that mom and dad are not the only adults invested in them as people. Financial support can help to, and it doesn't have to be tons of money either-- it could be a couple 20s tucked in a hand to order pizza once in a while during the lean years when day care costs eat up all your disposable income.
I struggled with mental health when my DD was very young and I didn't wish, or expect, anyone would just come change her diapers or watch her while I went to dinner. I just wished I had felt supported in any way by my parents or ILs. They were mostly absent, and when they were present they were critical or indifferent. It absolutely impacted my mental well being. Both my DH and I felt abandoned by our families during that time. It was very hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i have been confused for a while by this notion that boomer parents have of like - your kids, we have zero responsibility to help.
Like - ok you CAN take that pov, but then why did you have kids if you only wanted to help them for 18 years?
I have been very confused for a while by this notion that millennial kids are owed a support for life, and the only reason for their parents’ existence is to provide that support. Why did you have kids if you can’t manage being a parent?
Exactly, are these millennials going to be jumping in to help their own kids when they have children?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i have been confused for a while by this notion that boomer parents have of like - your kids, we have zero responsibility to help.
Like - ok you CAN take that pov, but then why did you have kids if you only wanted to help them for 18 years?
How old were your parents when you had kids?
It’s the Gen X or whatever who have been having babies much later than other generations that will have it tough. If you have a baby at 40 years old and then your child has a baby at 35 years old the grandmother would be 75 already.
Different poster here.
I am Gen X (born in 75) and had my first kid at 24. My mom was 51 when my baby (her first grandchild) was born.
Anonymous wrote:I think the window for “grandparent help” is small these days…they have to be old enough not to be working FT yet young enough to be capable kwim?
In our case, my parents were still young enough to be working FT when my kids were small- and DH’s were quite elderly already and not up to helping care for small kids.
Both sets of our parents had a lot of help- but the grandmothers did not work, and were younger.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i have been confused for a while by this notion that boomer parents have of like - your kids, we have zero responsibility to help.
Like - ok you CAN take that pov, but then why did you have kids if you only wanted to help them for 18 years?
How old were your parents when you had kids?
It’s the Gen X or whatever who have been having babies much later than other generations that will have it tough. If you have a baby at 40 years old and then your child has a baby at 35 years old the grandmother would be 75 already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i have been confused for a while by this notion that boomer parents have of like - your kids, we have zero responsibility to help.
Like - ok you CAN take that pov, but then why did you have kids if you only wanted to help them for 18 years?
How old were your parents when you had kids?
It’s the Gen X or whatever who have been having babies much later than other generations that will have it tough. If you have a baby at 40 years old and then your child has a baby at 35 years old the grandmother would be 75 already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i have been confused for a while by this notion that boomer parents have of like - your kids, we have zero responsibility to help.
Like - ok you CAN take that pov, but then why did you have kids if you only wanted to help them for 18 years?
How old were your parents when you had kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i have been confused for a while by this notion that boomer parents have of like - your kids, we have zero responsibility to help.
Like - ok you CAN take that pov, but then why did you have kids if you only wanted to help them for 18 years?
I have been very confused for a while by this notion that millennial kids are owed a support for life, and the only reason for their parents’ existence is to provide that support. Why did you have kids if you can’t manage being a parent?
Multi-generational help is not a new concept. And something that’s still practiced by many traditional cultures around the world. What IS new is grandparents refusing to help out or be involved with their grandkids lives in a meaningful way.