Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will wraparound services fix the problem? No. Ending poverty and structural racism is the only thing that will fix the problem. But it might help, whereas increasing criminalization does not help.
I agree. Wrap around services are treating the symptom so will help some but they don't address the true cause of generational poverty and the crime that follows. Universal basic income would help with the poverty.
I have some employees who grew up in generational poverty. They hate their mothers. Their mothers had them at young ages and just yelled at them throughout their childhood. Their mothers become disabled in their 50's through strokes and/or morbid obesity. The government provides free caregivers for their mothers.
At some point personal accountability and working jobs needs to be the priority.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will wraparound services fix the problem? No. Ending poverty and structural racism is the only thing that will fix the problem. But it might help, whereas increasing criminalization does not help.
I agree. Wrap around services are treating the symptom so will help some but they don't address the true cause of generational poverty and the crime that follows. Universal basic income would help with the poverty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generational trauma = Culture
And you can't change culture with wrap-around services. The community has to want to change. How do you promote cultural change in a dysfunctional culture? I have no idea. \
The first thing should be for the government to admit that these groups have been wronged. Next, reparations would be a huge step forward in addressing the inequality created by systemic discrimination. After 300 years of reparations, then we can see if we need to do anything else.
Interesting, how do you think reparations will help initiate cultural change? Would giving money to large numbers of people reduce their incentives to work? Or are you saying that if we fund people to stay home with their children they will do a better job raising them? do we have evidence that large welfare states improve societal outcomes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry it’s the culture.
You can’t fix them until you fix that.
UBI would fix it. It would teach responsibility.
It would do the exact opposite. DC basically already has UBI with all the free housing, free food, free childcare, free spending money, plus no more policing of antisocial behavior. The skyrocketing violent crime speaks for itself.
Oh, you misunderstood. It would teach the government and upper class responsibility.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry it’s the culture.
You can’t fix them until you fix that.
UBI would fix it. It would teach responsibility.
It would do the exact opposite. DC basically already has UBI with all the free housing, free food, free childcare, free spending money, plus no more policing of antisocial behavior. The skyrocketing violent crime speaks for itself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry it’s the culture.
You can’t fix them until you fix that.
UBI would fix it. It would teach responsibility.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry it’s the culture.
You can’t fix them until you fix that.
Anonymous wrote:Generational trauma = Culture
And you can't change culture with wrap-around services. The community has to want to change. How do you promote cultural change in a dysfunctional culture? I have no idea. \