Anonymous wrote:This policy is such a classic case of having a theoretical plan that goes wrong in the real world.
Of course the kids taking advantage will be the panicked A hunters. I agree with what a PP said. In this messed up environment, it is fully accurate that one B will blow your chances at a whole class of colleges. And they know it. These are very motivated kids and there are plenty of them.
The kids pulling Cs and Ds and failing and not getting the material who this policy was meant to capture and help. Are they really more motivated by this policy? Probably not much.
In my view this was all predictable, but hey they figured it out in the real world I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a little sad about this, because my kid is the kid that the original policy was likely intended for - a HFA/ADHD kid in regular classes who tends to struggle with the faster pace of HS. He does well in some classes, but others like math and science, he really needs the extra help sometimes. It never occurred to me that kids were retaking at a 92. (I honestly thought the original grade had to be below an 80) Because actual tests are infrequent and maybe one or two a quarter, if my kid gets a 62 the entire quarter is a loss. The fact that he does pretty well on the smaller chunk quizzes and schoolwork doesn’t really count for anything.
But your kid can still retake a 62 and turn it into an 80
Anonymous wrote:I’m a little sad about this, because my kid is the kid that the original policy was likely intended for - a HFA/ADHD kid in regular classes who tends to struggle with the faster pace of HS. He does well in some classes, but others like math and science, he really needs the extra help sometimes. It never occurred to me that kids were retaking at a 92. (I honestly thought the original grade had to be below an 80) Because actual tests are infrequent and maybe one or two a quarter, if my kid gets a 62 the entire quarter is a loss. The fact that he does pretty well on the smaller chunk quizzes and schoolwork doesn’t really count for anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a little sad about this, because my kid is the kid that the original policy was likely intended for - a HFA/ADHD kid in regular classes who tends to struggle with the faster pace of HS. He does well in some classes, but others like math and science, he really needs the extra help sometimes. It never occurred to me that kids were retaking at a 92. (I honestly thought the original grade had to be below an 80) Because actual tests are infrequent and maybe one or two a quarter, if my kid gets a 62 the entire quarter is a loss. The fact that he does pretty well on the smaller chunk quizzes and schoolwork doesn’t really count for anything.
Of course kids are retaking even if above an 80. These HS kids have been told since middle school that they won't get into a "good" college unless they have straight As. Take a journey over to the College board here and see people being told that anything less than a 4.0 UW knocks you out of contention for UVA. Of course, not all kids are headed to UVA or even want to go there, but imagine the stress of feeling like a single B has completely removed an entire group of colleges, regardless of how well you do in everything else? I don't blame kids for chasing As. They can't rely on homework (proof they are actually TRYING) to boost their grades anymore. Bonus: When they restudy and get those extra points, they've reinforced what they've learned.
Anonymous wrote:Most of the tests my kids take are online & scored right away (automatically). So grading extra tests isn’t a thing unless it’s an essay test. I suppose offering the remediation is the burdensome part for teachers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a little sad about this, because my kid is the kid that the original policy was likely intended for - a HFA/ADHD kid in regular classes who tends to struggle with the faster pace of HS. He does well in some classes, but others like math and science, he really needs the extra help sometimes. It never occurred to me that kids were retaking at a 92. (I honestly thought the original grade had to be below an 80) Because actual tests are infrequent and maybe one or two a quarter, if my kid gets a 62 the entire quarter is a loss. The fact that he does pretty well on the smaller chunk quizzes and schoolwork doesn’t really count for anything.
Of course kids are retaking even if above an 80. These HS kids have been told since middle school that they won't get into a "good" college unless they have straight As. Take a journey over to the College board here and see people being told that anything less than a 4.0 UW knocks you out of contention for UVA. Of course, not all kids are headed to UVA or even want to go there, but imagine the stress of feeling like a single B has completely removed an entire group of colleges, regardless of how well you do in everything else? I don't blame kids for chasing As. They can't rely on homework (proof they are actually TRYING) to boost their grades anymore. Bonus: When they restudy and get those extra points, they've reinforced what they've learned.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a little sad about this, because my kid is the kid that the original policy was likely intended for - a HFA/ADHD kid in regular classes who tends to struggle with the faster pace of HS. He does well in some classes, but others like math and science, he really needs the extra help sometimes. It never occurred to me that kids were retaking at a 92. (I honestly thought the original grade had to be below an 80) Because actual tests are infrequent and maybe one or two a quarter, if my kid gets a 62 the entire quarter is a loss. The fact that he does pretty well on the smaller chunk quizzes and schoolwork doesn’t really count for anything.
Anonymous wrote:How do they expect these children to survive college where there are No retake?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people who say kids were “exploiting” or “abusing” the policy are somewhat incorrect. The policy was that kids were alllowed to re-take tests/summative assessments, and that’s what kids were doing. They were using the policy as stated. Aps should have been more thoughtful in their statement of the policy, but kids were not misusing it. Additionally, there were a few teachers who were not really using the policy in the spirit it was intended. I think teachers (adults) who are trying to game the systems is much shadier. For example- one teacher changed all of their tests to quizzes (which cannot be made up) and were say 98 pts instead of 100. Then they just gave one huge test at the end of the quarter. The “quizzes” were essentially tests- in the previous year they were but this year they were just “quizzes.” Or teachers who create a huge barrier of busy work that they will not go over or meet to help you with before you can re-take the test. The busy work has no bearing on learning- it’s just gatekeeping. Or a teacher who won’t let kids re-take the test until a month after the initial test to “see if you are really going to study.” I find this kind of passive aggressive distortion of the policy to be more egregious.
Additionally, I think the “there are no re-takes or do overs in the real world” reasoning is not true. Sure there are fireable offenses or people who make big mistakes. But people ask bosses for extra time or prioritize one task over another knowing that they can go back and improve the task that they back burnered. You can ask for an extension on filing your taxes. You can go to office hours at college and get help with assignments or talk about an extension in extreme situations. You can get an “incomplete” and finish a course later. You can take a course pass/fail. Life is filled with opportunities. It’s not as extreme as people are suggesting. The people who want kids to “understand the real world” are the same people who are walking uphill to school and back home🙄
Agree. However, changing "tests" to "quizzes" is not a problem per se. All those quizzes should be periodic checks and preparation for the quarterly test. IF the teacher and students use the quizzes properly, they would be using them to learn what they still need to learn and review and correct missed questions, etc. The teacher "could" give points for making the test corrections to help make-up for lower grades. But it should all be geared toward increasing understanding and optimizing preparation for tests. The problem isn't the policy, it's not implementing instruction appropriately.
Busy work without review or purpose, not meeting with students to give extra help, just "waiting and seeing" a month: all are purely lazy non-teaching. Unacceptable; but sadly not uncommon. It doesn't adhere to the policy, it doesn't adhere to the spirit of the policy, it doesn't align with the spirit of high-quality or effective teaching.
You have some good points about the no do-overs in life myth. However, those are specific and only "sometimes" opportunities. You don't get unlimited deadlines and retakes on everything all the time, as has been the practice in APS lately. You have to learn what things and when you might have a second chance are. And many of the examples you cite are not without consequences or effects. On the contrary, students are learning that it does apply all the time and there are no consequences.
Anonymous wrote:I think people who say kids were “exploiting” or “abusing” the policy are somewhat incorrect. The policy was that kids were alllowed to re-take tests/summative assessments, and that’s what kids were doing. They were using the policy as stated. Aps should have been more thoughtful in their statement of the policy, but kids were not misusing it. Additionally, there were a few teachers who were not really using the policy in the spirit it was intended. I think teachers (adults) who are trying to game the systems is much shadier. For example- one teacher changed all of their tests to quizzes (which cannot be made up) and were say 98 pts instead of 100. Then they just gave one huge test at the end of the quarter. The “quizzes” were essentially tests- in the previous year they were but this year they were just “quizzes.” Or teachers who create a huge barrier of busy work that they will not go over or meet to help you with before you can re-take the test. The busy work has no bearing on learning- it’s just gatekeeping. Or a teacher who won’t let kids re-take the test until a month after the initial test to “see if you are really going to study.” I find this kind of passive aggressive distortion of the policy to be more egregious.
Additionally, I think the “there are no re-takes or do overs in the real world” reasoning is not true. Sure there are fireable offenses or people who make big mistakes. But people ask bosses for extra time or prioritize one task over another knowing that they can go back and improve the task that they back burnered. You can ask for an extension on filing your taxes. You can go to office hours at college and get help with assignments or talk about an extension in extreme situations. You can get an “incomplete” and finish a course later. You can take a course pass/fail. Life is filled with opportunities. It’s not as extreme as people are suggesting. The people who want kids to “understand the real world” are the same people who are walking uphill to school and back home🙄