Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was a history major at Cal and am now in finance.
Me too. I am a lobbyist (with a JD). ALL of my history major friends from college - save 1 - went to law school. They now work in various law-related fields.
Anonymous wrote:My niece had a great experience as a history major at Swarthmore.
A suggestion when looking at any small college: check semester-by-semester course listings over a few semesters to see how many courses are actually being offered. The quality of the learning experience is likely to be super in any teaching-focused department, but you want a big enough department that the student has a chance to study a range of courses during an undergraduate career, even with faculty leaves.
Anonymous wrote:He will have to compete with all the students masquerading as History majors who will immediately switch to CS or engineering the moment they get accepted. Our school has quite a few of them. You can immediately spot them because they apply for their "true" major to the state schools where you cannot switch easily.
Anonymous wrote:Does he know what era and area of history he is interested in? If so, he should look at what professors have written papers on those topics (google scholar is great and free for searching) and see what university they teach at. History gets very specialized very quickly!
If he is interested in history more generally, then honestly any university or SLAC is probably fine. He could also look at factors such as what social science research opportunities the school offers, any interesting travel abroad history focused programs, grad school acceptance rates, and class sizes to form close relationships with professors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:William and Mary for US history.
That’s what I was going to suggest, but OP already commented that W&M is “too provincial” for her kid.
Anonymous wrote:I was a history major at Cal and am now in finance.
Anonymous wrote:My husband went into software. He was hired at Arthur Andersen straight out of college. And in 5 years went out on his own consulting business and was making $300k (back in the late 90s). And then more…
The skills and brain it takes to write, absorb all those facts and analyze and communicate translate into a person that is incredibly valuable in the workforce.
My kids, like my husband and I, are equally strong in STEM and humanities. That helps—in law school, in the real world.
People Pooh Pooh history majors -ignorance. The same people that can’t get a 4 or 5 on a history AP exam. When you can get 5s in all subject areas—then talk.
Anonymous wrote:William and Mary for US history.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All SLACs are good for this generally, in that you are taught almost exclusively by tenure track professors. This is especially true at SLACs with a consortium, so you have other SLACs to choose from and possibly even graduate courses as a senior: the Claremont Colleges, the Five Colleges, and the tri-co consortium come to mind.
As for larger schools, the top Ph.D. History programs don’t typically provide the best undergraduate experience. Best bet is probably mid-size schools with lots of resources and smaller classes.
THIS^^^. Go to a smaller school with a good history dept where your kid will be in smaller courses and able to engage with the professors. whether they are headed to law school or any other PHD program, they will benefit from this and with recommendations. It will be easier to engage with profs and be more involved in research, etc at a smaller school.
This is a horrible idea. Once Republcans take over these schools will be worthless.