Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When you want and can care properly for them.
That will vary enormously by person. The right age for my first was 34 when I had achieved a career level that gave me six months of maternity leave and on-site childcare, as well as a plan to fully fund college.
I’m sure your kid will be thrilled to have student loan repayments hang over them for life so their mom could avoid being an “old mom”.
+1. I had my kids in my mid 20’s and early 30’s and and while it may have been physically easier, the detrimental effect it had on our finances and my career progression was so significant, I would not recommend this path to anyone, unless you have a very wealthy family that’s willing to help. I feel like this isn’t talked about enough here and instead there’s pages of posters berating people for being granny moms and having kids past 40.
Obviously money plays a role.
Right, so it’s obviously nasty and disingenuous of people to unfairly target older mothers who may have wanted to wait until they were financially stable to have kids.
I think the age of women should still be before 35 for at least first child.
This thread is about age of mother. The woman could be younger than the man.
DH is a year younger than me. I was earning around 200k at age 30 when we had our first. Dh was earning less. By the time I had my third, he was earning 500k.
I do think 25 is young because you haven’t established yourself at work yet.