Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People - Many of these so-called suspects are children!
By law, they are entitled to “youthful offender” status, and understandably treated differently when they slip up. Everyone makes mistakes. Youthful offender goes up to age 26 in DC.
Don’t you want to give children a second chance?
Nope not when they are engaged in violent crimes
Like I literally just don't care
Locking ppl up LT does stop them from committing crimes and provides some deterrence
How's all this light / no sentencing working out?
Jesus Christ. Listen to yourself. You want to sentence kids to long-term prison sentences. You are lacking a serious mental compass.
ANd are an example of the depths of sh--- this country is sinking to.
Violent 25 year olds are not kids
They are kids until they reach the age of 26. Before that their brains aren't fully formed. I'm sorry, but that's just basic science.
So let me get this straight just so I'm clear - Dem logic is that people do not have fully formed brains until they're 26 years old, therefore they shouldn't face the full wrath of the law when they commit crime because they make poorer choices due to yet to be fully mature brains?
Funny! Yet Dems keep demanding gender affirming care for 12 year old who think they're trans? And they want to confuse their sexuality while they have impressionable young minds? Pray tell, of people younger than 26 don't have fully developed brains and shouldn't face full consequences for crime, then why should we have gender affirming care that can permanently alter a person's health when they're 12 years old? The latter has a mature enough mind now to determine that? You can't have it both ways!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People - Many of these so-called suspects are children!
By law, they are entitled to “youthful offender” status, and understandably treated differently when they slip up. Everyone makes mistakes. Youthful offender goes up to age 26 in DC.
Don’t you want to give children a second chance?
Nope not when they are engaged in violent crimes
Like I literally just don't care
Locking ppl up LT does stop them from committing crimes and provides some deterrence
How's all this light / no sentencing working out?
Jesus Christ. Listen to yourself. You want to sentence kids to long-term prison sentences. You are lacking a serious mental compass.
ANd are an example of the depths of sh--- this country is sinking to.
Violent 25 year olds are not kids
They are kids until they reach the age of 26. Before that their brains aren't fully formed. I'm sorry, but that's just basic science.
So let me get this straight just so I'm clear - Dem logic is that people do not have fully formed brains until they're 26 years old, therefore they shouldn't face the full wrath of the law when they commit crime because they make poorer choices due to yet to be fully mature brains?
Funny! Yet Dems keep demanding gender affirming care for 12 year old who think they're trans? And they want to confuse their sexuality while they have impressionable young minds? Pray tell, of people younger than 26 don't have fully developed brains and shouldn't face full consequences for crime, then why should we have gender affirming care that can permanently alter a person's health when they're 12 years old? The latter has a mature enough mind now to determine that? You can't have it both ways!
Anonymous wrote:Councilmember "carjackers are just cold" Allen should donate his full salary to a local victims fund this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good for kids to challenge some people's historic car privilege.
The government could do more by providing free cars for those under 18.
This is actually not a bad idea! Graduate from high school with a 3.5 or higher and you get a car, if you are at the lower economic level.
Anonymous wrote:The criminals who shot and killed the Afghan interpreter - they're still out there, right? No arrests?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The criminals who shot and killed the Afghan interpreter - they're still out there, right? No arrests?
no arrest in that case or in the carjacking of the congressman
number is up to 911 this am, may hit 1,000 by year end and that does not count the large # classed as uuu, the attempts, etc. stolen car number is more than double that.
in the 90s this kind of random, dispersed, in broad daylight crime was not the norm, but prosecution rates were much higher then.
No arrests in the murder of the Afghan interpreter makes me so damn angry, far FAR more than the carjacking of a member of congress.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The criminals who shot and killed the Afghan interpreter - they're still out there, right? No arrests?
no arrest in that case or in the carjacking of the congressman
number is up to 911 this am, may hit 1,000 by year end and that does not count the large # classed as uuu, the attempts, etc. stolen car number is more than double that.
in the 90s this kind of random, dispersed, in broad daylight crime was not the norm, but prosecution rates were much higher then.
Anonymous wrote:The criminals who shot and killed the Afghan interpreter - they're still out there, right? No arrests?