Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dear God I cannot believe this has turned into a game of handing off unwanted children.
Can we just agree the goal should be to enable women to control their fertility so there are no unwanted children?
As an adoptee who was very much wanted by my wonderful (adoptive) parents, STFU.
+1 not an adoptee but pp is being incredibly offensive to all adoptees. They are wanted children.
They weren’t wanted to the ones that birthed them. I’m sorry it’s offensive, but gestating another human is extremely difficult and deadly work. No one willingly goes through it just to joyfully hand their child over at the end. It’s a primal trauma.
The fact that adoptive parents very want a child doesn’t change the fact that the child’s birth or later separation from their birth parents is an inherently traumatic and painful act from which some women never recover. It’s a joy built on profound sorrow. There should no thing as newborn baby adoptions outside of planned surrogacy arrangements- end of story.
It sounds like you are saying that all biological parents in the US should be prevented from terminating their parental obligations and therefore forced by the state to raise their children. Is that right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dear God I cannot believe this has turned into a game of handing off unwanted children.
Can we just agree the goal should be to enable women to control their fertility so there are no unwanted children?
As an adoptee who was very much wanted by my wonderful (adoptive) parents, STFU.
+1 not an adoptee but pp is being incredibly offensive to all adoptees. They are wanted children.
They weren’t wanted to the ones that birthed them. I’m sorry it’s offensive, but gestating another human is extremely difficult and deadly work. No one willingly goes through it just to joyfully hand their child over at the end. It’s a primal trauma.
The fact that adoptive parents very want a child doesn’t change the fact that the child’s birth or later separation from their birth parents is an inherently traumatic and painful act from which some women never recover. It’s a joy built on profound sorrow. There should no thing as newborn baby adoptions outside of planned surrogacy arrangements- end of story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dear God I cannot believe this has turned into a game of handing off unwanted children.
Can we just agree the goal should be to enable women to control their fertility so there are no unwanted children?
As an adoptee who was very much wanted by my wonderful (adoptive) parents, STFU.
+1 not an adoptee but pp is being incredibly offensive to all adoptees. They are wanted children.
They weren’t wanted to the ones that birthed them. I’m sorry it’s offensive, but gestating another human is extremely difficult and deadly work. No one willingly goes through it just to joyfully hand their child over at the end. It’s a primal trauma.
The fact that adoptive parents very want a child doesn’t change the fact that the child’s birth or later separation from their birth parents is an inherently traumatic and painful act from which some women never recover. It’s a joy built on profound sorrow. There should no thing as newborn baby adoptions outside of planned surrogacy arrangements- end of story.
You are delusional about the reality of situations that occur.
What situations are you referring to? Do you think sluts pop out babies and hand them over for sport?
I have no problem with foster adoptions, by the way. But newborn adoptions should not exist. Period.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dear God I cannot believe this has turned into a game of handing off unwanted children.
Can we just agree the goal should be to enable women to control their fertility so there are no unwanted children?
As an adoptee who was very much wanted by my wonderful (adoptive) parents, STFU.
+1 not an adoptee but pp is being incredibly offensive to all adoptees. They are wanted children.
They weren’t wanted to the ones that birthed them. I’m sorry it’s offensive, but gestating another human is extremely difficult and deadly work. No one willingly goes through it just to joyfully hand their child over at the end. It’s a primal trauma.
The fact that adoptive parents very want a child doesn’t change the fact that the child’s birth or later separation from their birth parents is an inherently traumatic and painful act from which some women never recover. It’s a joy built on profound sorrow. There should no thing as newborn baby adoptions outside of planned surrogacy arrangements- end of story.
You are delusional about the reality of situations that occur.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dear God I cannot believe this has turned into a game of handing off unwanted children.
Can we just agree the goal should be to enable women to control their fertility so there are no unwanted children?
As an adoptee who was very much wanted by my wonderful (adoptive) parents, STFU.
+1 not an adoptee but pp is being incredibly offensive to all adoptees. They are wanted children.
They weren’t wanted to the ones that birthed them. I’m sorry it’s offensive, but gestating another human is extremely difficult and deadly work. No one willingly goes through it just to joyfully hand their child over at the end. It’s a primal trauma.
The fact that adoptive parents very want a child doesn’t change the fact that the child’s birth or later separation from their birth parents is an inherently traumatic and painful act from which some women never recover. It’s a joy built on profound sorrow. There should no thing as newborn baby adoptions outside of planned surrogacy arrangements- end of story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Studies now show how infants suffer from being separated from their biological mother. It's a despicable process And should be illegal. Instead, help women whom have children,
It really depends on the circumstances and as an adoptee who knew my (paranoid schizophrenic since 19 years old) birth mom, I am ever so thankful to be adopted and to be officially adopted, not some bs guardianship as a PP proposed.
Unless you are adopted, just stop talking, you don't understand.
I have every right to say what I think about adoption. It is an evil practice. If the birth mother cannot care for her child then someone in her family should be named as guardian or, if known the father of the child or member of his family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dear God I cannot believe this has turned into a game of handing off unwanted children.
Can we just agree the goal should be to enable women to control their fertility so there are no unwanted children?
As an adoptee who was very much wanted by my wonderful (adoptive) parents, STFU.
+1 not an adoptee but pp is being incredibly offensive to all adoptees. They are wanted children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dear God I cannot believe this has turned into a game of handing off unwanted children.
Can we just agree the goal should be to enable women to control their fertility so there are no unwanted children?
Yes.
But for some reason, lots of conservative Catholics and evangelicals want there to be a lot of unwanted traumatized children. I don't understand it, but it's where we are as a country right now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dear God I cannot believe this has turned into a game of handing off unwanted children.
Can we just agree the goal should be to enable women to control their fertility so there are no unwanted children?
As an adoptee who was very much wanted by my wonderful (adoptive) parents, STFU.
Anonymous wrote:Dear God I cannot believe this has turned into a game of handing off unwanted children.
Can we just agree the goal should be to enable women to control their fertility so there are no unwanted children?
Anonymous wrote:Dear God I cannot believe this has turned into a game of handing off unwanted children.
Can we just agree the goal should be to enable women to control their fertility so there are no unwanted children?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Studies now show how infants suffer from being separated from their biological mother. It's a despicable process And should be illegal. Instead, help women whom have children,
It really depends on the circumstances and as an adoptee who knew my (paranoid schizophrenic since 19 years old) birth mom, I am ever so thankful to be adopted and to be officially adopted, not some bs guardianship as a PP proposed.
Unless you are adopted, just stop talking, you don't understand.
I have every right to say what I think about adoption. It is an evil practice. If the birth mother cannot care for her child then someone in her family should be named as guardian or, if known the father of the child or member of his family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Studies now show how infants suffer from being separated from their biological mother. It's a despicable process And should be illegal. Instead, help women whom have children,
It really depends on the circumstances and as an adoptee who knew my (paranoid schizophrenic since 19 years old) birth mom, I am ever so thankful to be adopted and to be officially adopted, not some bs guardianship as a PP proposed.
Unless you are adopted, just stop talking, you don't understand.
I have every right to say what I think about adoption. It is an evil practice. If the birth mother cannot care for her child then someone in her family should be named as guardian or, if known the father of the child or member of his family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
This is pretty sick.
You know what’s really sick? This evangelical military couple with a passel of sons who stole an Afghan baby whose parents were killed in the war.
https://apnews.com/article/afghan-baby-us-mar...4b288a0a8415735e24ab
Is there an update on this case? Has the child been returned to the Afghani couple?
How would they be returned if their parents were killed in war?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
This is pretty sick.
You know what’s really sick? This evangelical military couple with a passel of sons who stole an Afghan baby whose parents were killed in the war.
https://apnews.com/article/afghan-baby-us-mar...4b288a0a8415735e24ab
Is there an update on this case? Has the child been returned to the Afghani couple?
How would they be returned if their parents were killed in war?