Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has released the House for the weekend and he is a scheduled speaker at a conference in Paris. She can deny whatever she wants, but the facts kind of speak for themselves.
Did any of the people who are reporting this check with the Speaker's office regarding his travel plans?
They asked his office who refused to provide answers about what he was doing. Why won’t they just say what he’s up to? What’s he hiding?
Who is "they?" Name names.
Corinne Day, for one. She is his press flack and should be able to handle the press.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has released the House for the weekend and he is a scheduled speaker at a conference in Paris. She can deny whatever she wants, but the facts kind of speak for themselves.
Did any of the people who are reporting this check with the Speaker's office regarding his travel plans?
They asked his office who refused to provide answers about what he was doing. Why won’t they just say what he’s up to? What’s he hiding?
Who is "they?" Name names.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has released the House for the weekend and he is a scheduled speaker at a conference in Paris. She can deny whatever she wants, but the facts kind of speak for themselves.
Did any of the people who are reporting this check with the Speaker's office regarding his travel plans?
They asked his office who refused to provide answers about what he was doing. Why won’t they just say what he’s up to? What’s he hiding?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has released the House for the weekend and he is a scheduled speaker at a conference in Paris. She can deny whatever she wants, but the facts kind of speak for themselves.
Did any of the people who are reporting this check with the Speaker's office regarding his travel plans?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has released the House for the weekend and he is a scheduled speaker at a conference in Paris. She can deny whatever she wants, but the facts kind of speak for themselves.
Did any of the people who are reporting this check with the Speaker's office regarding his travel plans?
Is Johnson at work today? Or did he release everyone early yesterday?
That’s all that matters. If he’s partying in Paris, then it’s just insult upon injury.
No - what matters is if journalist are actually reporting facts by gathering information from all sources.
Sounds like they aren't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has released the House for the weekend and he is a scheduled speaker at a conference in Paris. She can deny whatever she wants, but the facts kind of speak for themselves.
Did any of the people who are reporting this check with the Speaker's office regarding his travel plans?
Is Johnson at work today? Or did he release everyone early yesterday?
That’s all that matters. If he’s partying in Paris, then it’s just insult upon injury.
No - what matters is if journalist are actually reporting facts by gathering information from all sources.
Sounds like they aren't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has released the House for the weekend and he is a scheduled speaker at a conference in Paris. She can deny whatever she wants, but the facts kind of speak for themselves.
Did any of the people who are reporting this check with the Speaker's office regarding his travel plans?
Is Johnson at work today? Or did he release everyone early yesterday?
That’s all that matters. If he’s partying in Paris, then it’s just insult upon injury.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has released the House for the weekend and he is a scheduled speaker at a conference in Paris. She can deny whatever she wants, but the facts kind of speak for themselves.
Did any of the people who are reporting this check with the Speaker's office regarding his travel plans?
Anonymous wrote:He has released the House for the weekend and he is a scheduled speaker at a conference in Paris. She can deny whatever she wants, but the facts kind of speak for themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Under the GOP, it's clear the House Republicans are far more interested in performative bullshit and partisan witch hunts than they actually are about keeping the government running and functional.
It's a huge disgrace. I honestly can't understand how anyone in their right mind can vote Republican anymore.
Our govt isn't functional. Hasn't been for years. Where have you been?
Let me help you. REPUBLICANS have kept the govt from functioning. They put up ridiculous bills that they know they will not pass, they purposely hurt our National Security (looking at you Tommy T), and shut down govt if they don’t get their way. Don’t blame Democrats. You may not like their policies, but they are in government to enact legislation.
I don't like their policies and their lack of agility. I don't like that federal service has become a jobs program and that's there's a ridiculous number of layers of management in federal bureaucracies. I don't like the fact that we're paying more than ever for .gov and getting less.
I don't like that they screw up everything they touch and they've become an income transfer scheme for the progressive left. Your answer to everything is to throw more money at it.
My answer is to cut it severely and get rid of whole layers of management in government (AKA, the rubber-stamp brigade) and bring back the agility for it to be effective again.
Government - If you think the problems we create are bad, just wait until you see our solution.