Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would like to see the total compensation of non-school based staff. I know chiefs make well upwards of $200K and there are a lot of employees at willow oaks and gatehouse. I don’t care that they are a smaller number than school-based, we still pay them and most do very little to help teachers and students.
This and the teacher shortage is getting worse each year.
FCPS hiring a few chiefs has literally nothing to do with a teacher shortage. Their salaries are drops in the large bucket of the FCPS budget. Teachers who are upset about their salaries need to go after the real issue! a lack of funding from the state and county.
Or, start getting rid of wasteful programming that the community demands but is unnecessary:
1) AAP centers
2) AAP center transportation
3) the entire DEI department
4) the Get2Green staff
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would like to see the total compensation of non-school based staff. I know chiefs make well upwards of $200K and there are a lot of employees at willow oaks and gatehouse. I don’t care that they are a smaller number than school-based, we still pay them and most do very little to help teachers and students.
This and the teacher shortage is getting worse each year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our terrible elementary school principal got promoted to a middle school where o hear he is just as terrible. Hoping he gets a high school next!
I don't think moving from an ES principal to a MS principal is considered a "promotion"--just a job switch.
It’s more responsibility and typically more kids. Is the pay higher to reflect this?
ES and MS principals are paid the same now. Some elementary schools are almost as big as a middle school, and ES principals were tired of getting less pay for the same work. While a MS principal may have more students, they also have more administrators on their team.
Anonymous wrote:I would like to see the total compensation of non-school based staff. I know chiefs make well upwards of $200K and there are a lot of employees at willow oaks and gatehouse. I don’t care that they are a smaller number than school-based, we still pay them and most do very little to help teachers and students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Central office staff don’t need a 6% raise. And we don’t need to keep adding highly paid “chiefs.”
We will continue to add central administrators as the community continues to demand more programming!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which successful principals chose to leave FCPS? Did the majority go to over districts, or what happened to them? It would be interesting to see where they landed, and to understand why they left. It doesn’t seem like a big challenge if the district wanted to have real data about what caused them to go.
FCPS used to give an extra pension that neighboring districts don’t. Principals who have reached eligibility for that pension are “retiring” from FCPS, collecting retirement funds, and then working for neighboring districts and earning full salaries.
That extra pension was cut sometime in the late 90s or early 00s. These older teachers and administrators are grandfathered in. No one in their 40s or younger is getting an extra pension. I know because I was not offered that extra pension when I started work in the mid 00s.
-former FCPS teacher
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which successful principals chose to leave FCPS? Did the majority go to over districts, or what happened to them? It would be interesting to see where they landed, and to understand why they left. It doesn’t seem like a big challenge if the district wanted to have real data about what caused them to go.
FCPS used to give an extra pension that neighboring districts don’t. Principals who have reached eligibility for that pension are “retiring” from FCPS, collecting retirement funds, and then working for neighboring districts and earning full salaries.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Central office staff don’t need a 6% raise. And we don’t need to keep adding highly paid “chiefs.”
You might be surprised to learn that many folks in the school buildings daily helping your child are central office employees. But eff them, right?
Anonymous wrote:Central office staff don’t need a 6% raise. And we don’t need to keep adding highly paid “chiefs.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And those two with convictions discussed upthread should absolutely have been fired. Reid is asking for a huge transfer from the county budget but keeps so many on central office payroll when they should be fired.
There are 25,175 employees in FCPS. Of that 7.5% are non-school based. Of that 1888, you’re talking about less than 10 people in these central office roles.
That means that 99.996% of staff are NOT in that “so many on central office payroll.” Staff need that 6% increase.
Anonymous wrote:Central office staff don’t need a 6% raise. And we don’t need to keep adding highly paid “chiefs.”