Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:also please explain how the primary process is responsible for MT.

It discourages people from running because they know the race is actually decided at the primary and there isn’t a real election where the majority of voters can decide the winner. We won’t get a variety of candidates until there is an actual election for the school board. We need to open up the playing field and let people- all people- run on their own merit.

If you're concerned about discouraging people from running, go talk to APE. I know a handful of people who would have been great, but who didn't want to run and expose themselves and their families to Miranda's APE attack machine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:also please explain how the primary process is responsible for MT.

It discourages people from running because they know the race is actually decided at the primary and there isn’t a real election where the majority of voters can decide the winner. We won’t get a variety of candidates until there is an actual election for the school board. We need to open up the playing field and let people- all people- run on their own merit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:also please explain how the primary process is responsible for MT.

It discourages people from running because they know the race is actually decided at the primary and there isn’t a real election where the majority of voters can decide the winner. We won’t get a variety of candidates until there is an actual election for the school board. We need to open up the playing field and let people- all people- run on their own merit.

It discourages Republicans/InDEpEnDeNTs from running.

I think you are wrong. I think more democrats would run. I think more people in general would run.

Are you threatened by people having a choice?

To get around the Hatch law?

I used to dislike the process but after seeing our last “independent” guy turn MAGA then maybe this filter isn’t so bad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:also please explain how the primary process is responsible for MT.

It discourages people from running because they know the race is actually decided at the primary and there isn’t a real election where the majority of voters can decide the winner. We won’t get a variety of candidates until there is an actual election for the school board. We need to open up the playing field and let people- all people- run on their own merit.

It discourages Republicans/InDEpEnDeNTs from running.

I think you are wrong. I think more democrats would run. I think more people in general would run.

Are you threatened by people having a choice?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:also please explain how the primary process is responsible for MT.

It discourages people from running because they know the race is actually decided at the primary and there isn’t a real election where the majority of voters can decide the winner. We won’t get a variety of candidates until there is an actual election for the school board. We need to open up the playing field and let people- all people- run on their own merit.

It discourages Republicans/InDEpEnDeNTs from running.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh goody! Another thread filled with Miranda derangement syndrome.

Sorry the Miranda camp can't handle being criticized. That is what happens when you run for public office. What I see about MT is far less harsh than what you all said about every other school board member. And teachers. And other community members.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:also please explain how the primary process is responsible for MT.

It discourages people from running because they know the race is actually decided at the primary and there isn’t a real election where the majority of voters can decide the winner. We won’t get a variety of candidates until there is an actual election for the school board. We need to open up the playing field and let people- all people- run on their own merit.

Anonymous wrote:also please explain how the primary process is responsible for MT.

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is so silly.

1. Yes, you are “stuck” with MT bc you all vote and support an undemocratic process that allows a few thousand voters to decide the school board member in a primary that gets remarkably low turnout every year.

2. You should be glad the actual adult won the primary, because the only other candidate was barely an adult with no connection to Arlington let alone a record of volunteering or working at APS.

Go boo-hoo somewhere else, or work to change the primary process.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m leaving the ballot blank. Like another PP wrote, it won’t stop her from getting on to the board, but at least I won’t have helped her get there.

I’m not gonna vote for someone who acts like she deserves credit for living in the Valley when, as some of her supporters claimed during her first run, she and her husband could afford to live anywhere in Arlington. White savior much?

Yeah she lived in the Valley but sent one kid to private school, and didn't send the others to the neighborhood school. Not good enough for her and Mr. Miranda MAGA apparently.

TEMPORARILY sent one to private. They went Arlington Montessori for public.

Exactly, they avoided going to Drew. With the black and brown kids.

Stop this nonsense right now. I can barely stomach even spending the energy to confront the sheer ignorance in this post, but, Miranda currently lives in Green Valley. Presently. She was on Drew's PTA. Run your eyeballs instead of your mouth and do some research, it will serve you better.

How many years have her three kids attended Drew, collectively?

Exactly. She was the white savior on Drew's PTA without deigning to actually send her OWN kids there. Despicable.

Her oldest was at drew after Montessori left. That’s why she was on the pta. She covered all this in forums.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m leaving the ballot blank. Like another PP wrote, it won’t stop her from getting on to the board, but at least I won’t have helped her get there.

I’m not gonna vote for someone who acts like she deserves credit for living in the Valley when, as some of her supporters claimed during her first run, she and her husband could afford to live anywhere in Arlington. White savior much?

Yeah she lived in the Valley but sent one kid to private school, and didn't send the others to the neighborhood school. Not good enough for her and Mr. Miranda MAGA apparently.

TEMPORARILY sent one to private. They went Arlington Montessori for public.

Exactly, they avoided going to Drew. With the black and brown kids.

Stop this nonsense right now. I can barely stomach even spending the energy to confront the sheer ignorance in this post, but, Miranda currently lives in Green Valley. Presently. She was on Drew's PTA. Run your eyeballs instead of your mouth and do some research, it will serve you better.

How many years have her three kids attended Drew, collectively?

Exactly. She was the white savior on Drew's PTA without deigning to actually send her OWN kids there. Despicable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m leaving the ballot blank. Like another PP wrote, it won’t stop her from getting on to the board, but at least I won’t have helped her get there.

I’m not gonna vote for someone who acts like she deserves credit for living in the Valley when, as some of her supporters claimed during her first run, she and her husband could afford to live anywhere in Arlington. White savior much?

Yeah she lived in the Valley but sent one kid to private school, and didn't send the others to the neighborhood school. Not good enough for her and Mr. Miranda MAGA apparently.

Is your point that option schools should be dismantled?