Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UChicago scoops up many unhooked high stats kids who can full pay. A few years ago they got a 4.0/1600 SAT kid who arguably was the smartest in the grade. They accept kids who can handle the work and thrive in an academic environment. What is it with this board who want to pull the kids down just because they have some wealth. Wealth does not equate academic aptitude. Yes, there is privilege but as any parent knows there are many kids who do not take advantage of their academic privilege. Only the hardworking, smarter kids get in.
Agreed. Wealth may work at HYP, where gettin in is easier a lot harder than getting out. But not Chicago.
UChicago has the Business Economics major for kids who cannot hack their regular majors. It might have some smart kids but it is no comparison to HYP. Our NYC private does sends a few to the school every year and most kids are above average but in no way brilliant or outstanding. Infact, top students rarely apply ED to UChicago.
SAT and GPA averages are equal to or higher than HYP. Only CalTech and MIT regularly beat UChicago on the numbers.
Are you the poster who said their 100 Nobel prizes don't count because Economics is quackery?
The three top students at our high school are going to MIT, UChicago and Yale. All ED / REA
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UChicago scoops up many unhooked high stats kids who can full pay. A few years ago they got a 4.0/1600 SAT kid who arguably was the smartest in the grade. They accept kids who can handle the work and thrive in an academic environment. What is it with this board who want to pull the kids down just because they have some wealth. Wealth does not equate academic aptitude. Yes, there is privilege but as any parent knows there are many kids who do not take advantage of their academic privilege. Only the hardworking, smarter kids get in.
Agreed. Wealth may work at HYP, where gettin in is easier a lot harder than getting out. But not Chicago.
UChicago has the Business Economics major for kids who cannot hack their regular majors. It might have some smart kids but it is no comparison to HYP. Our NYC private does sends a few to the school every year and most kids are above average but in no way brilliant or outstanding. Infact, top students rarely apply ED to UChicago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UChicago scoops up many unhooked high stats kids who can full pay. A few years ago they got a 4.0/1600 SAT kid who arguably was the smartest in the grade. They accept kids who can handle the work and thrive in an academic environment. What is it with this board who want to pull the kids down just because they have some wealth. Wealth does not equate academic aptitude. Yes, there is privilege but as any parent knows there are many kids who do not take advantage of their academic privilege. Only the hardworking, smarter kids get in.
Agreed. Wealth may work at HYP, where gettin in is easier a lot harder than getting out. But not Chicago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Class of 2027
1) UChicago - 87.8%
https://collegeadmissions.uchicago.edu/apply/class-2027-profile
2) MIT - 84.6%
https://mitadmissions.org/apply/process/stats/
3) Harvard - 84%
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/05/harvards-class-of-2027-yield-continues-strong-trend/
4) Stanford 83.66% - Fall 2021
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/02/28/acceptance-rate-drops-to-3-68-majority-women-and-non-white-students/#:~:text=Out%20of%20the%20competitive%20applicant,3.95%25%20in%20the%20previous%20year.
5) Princeton - 76/6%
https://profile.princeton.edu/admission-and-costs
6) Yale - 69.97%
https://admissions.yale.edu/sites/default/files/2027classprofileweb.pdf
https://tophscollege.blogspot.com/2022/10/universities-with-highest-yield-rate.html
This is the direct reflection of an excellent admissions team
No, Chicago's high yield is the direct result of ED1 and ED2. It's hard NOT to have a high yield when you have both.
UPenn and Ivies invented ED back in the days and all sorts of tactics and the current cartel system.
it's the American system. Colleges using it to admit who actually has the highest interest in the school.
Applying ED to a school does not necessarily indicate you really want to go to a school. It means you will go but not that you want to go.
Anonymous wrote: Class of 2027
1) UChicago - 87.8%
https://collegeadmissions.uchicago.edu/apply/class-2027-profile
2) MIT - 84.6%
https://mitadmissions.org/apply/process/stats/
3) Harvard - 84%
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/05/harvards-class-of-2027-yield-continues-strong-trend/
4) Stanford 83.66% - Fall 2021
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/02/28/acceptance-rate-drops-to-3-68-majority-women-and-non-white-students/#:~:text=Out%20of%20the%20competitive%20applicant,3.95%25%20in%20the%20previous%20year.
5) Princeton - 76/6%
https://profile.princeton.edu/admission-and-costs
6) Yale - 69.97%
https://admissions.yale.edu/sites/default/files/2027classprofileweb.pdf
https://tophscollege.blogspot.com/2022/10/universities-with-highest-yield-rate.html
Anonymous wrote:UChicago scoops up many unhooked high stats kids who can full pay. A few years ago they got a 4.0/1600 SAT kid who arguably was the smartest in the grade. They accept kids who can handle the work and thrive in an academic environment. What is it with this board who want to pull the kids down just because they have some wealth. Wealth does not equate academic aptitude. Yes, there is privilege but as any parent knows there are many kids who do not take advantage of their academic privilege. Only the hardworking, smarter kids get in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still only #12 school in country
Sounds like your IQ.