Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Dont just complain, get out and Vote:
School Board, At-Large (You can vote for up to 3 candidates)
Cassandra R. Aucoin
Maureen T. Brody
Saundra T. Davis
I plan to vote for Moon and Davis, both sensible moderates. McElveen and McDaniel are hard no’s for me. Of the remaining at-large candidates, who is the best choice and why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Of course, they have people running for school board who even started that nutty group C4TJ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Dont just complain, get out and Vote:
School Board, At-Large (You can vote for up to 3 candidates)
Cassandra R. Aucoin
Maureen T. Brody
Saundra T. Davis
I plan to vote for Moon and Davis, both sensible moderates. McElveen and McDaniel are hard no’s for me. Of the remaining at-large candidates, who is the best choice and why?
Peter Gabor (Great Teacher!) : https://petergabor.org/
Full time HS teacher with FCPS since 2010, teaching Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics
Certificated in Math, Computer Science, Physics
Baccalaureate degrees from MIT in Electrical Engineering, Math, Computer Science
Masters degrees (EECS) and doctorate (CS) from Princeton
Also taught in NJ (Princeton HS), WA (Interlake HS), OR (St. Mary's Academy)
Have you met him?
What does he mean by this:
“ I believe FCPS should follow the rule of law, adhering to Federal, State, and Local statutes. I don't see how we can lead by example absent this.”
He has a doctorate in CS but his website looks like poo. Weird.
MY DC had him for Linear Algebra and one post AP CS class at TJ few years back and he seemed reasonable and level-headed. Very intelligent but not arrogant. Did not seem political at all. I think he would be like rational scientist in his approach to educational policies w/o being swayed by biases or emotions. I would vote for him but I usually do not vote in local elections.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Of course, they have people running for school board who even started that nutty group C4TJ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Dont just complain, get out and Vote:
School Board, At-Large (You can vote for up to 3 candidates)
Cassandra R. Aucoin
Maureen T. Brody
Saundra T. Davis
I plan to vote for Moon and Davis, both sensible moderates. McElveen and McDaniel are hard no’s for me. Of the remaining at-large candidates, who is the best choice and why?
Peter Gabor (Great Teacher!) : https://petergabor.org/
Full time HS teacher with FCPS since 2010, teaching Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics
Certificated in Math, Computer Science, Physics
Baccalaureate degrees from MIT in Electrical Engineering, Math, Computer Science
Masters degrees (EECS) and doctorate (CS) from Princeton
Also taught in NJ (Princeton HS), WA (Interlake HS), OR (St. Mary's Academy)
Have you met him?
What does he mean by this:
“ I believe FCPS should follow the rule of law, adhering to Federal, State, and Local statutes. I don't see how we can lead by example absent this.”
He has a doctorate in CS but his website looks like poo. Weird.
Actual CS has nothing to do with building websites. That is a trade more like plumbing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Of course, they have people running for school board who even started that nutty group C4TJ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Dont just complain, get out and Vote:
School Board, At-Large (You can vote for up to 3 candidates)
Cassandra R. Aucoin
Maureen T. Brody
Saundra T. Davis
I plan to vote for Moon and Davis, both sensible moderates. McElveen and McDaniel are hard no’s for me. Of the remaining at-large candidates, who is the best choice and why?
Peter Gabor (Great Teacher!) : https://petergabor.org/
Full time HS teacher with FCPS since 2010, teaching Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics
Certificated in Math, Computer Science, Physics
Baccalaureate degrees from MIT in Electrical Engineering, Math, Computer Science
Masters degrees (EECS) and doctorate (CS) from Princeton
Also taught in NJ (Princeton HS), WA (Interlake HS), OR (St. Mary's Academy)
Have you met him?
What does he mean by this:
“ I believe FCPS should follow the rule of law, adhering to Federal, State, and Local statutes. I don't see how we can lead by example absent this.”
He has a doctorate in CS but his website looks like poo. Weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Dont just complain, get out and Vote:
School Board, At-Large (You can vote for up to 3 candidates)
Cassandra R. Aucoin
Maureen T. Brody
Saundra T. Davis
I plan to vote for Moon and Davis, both sensible moderates. McElveen and McDaniel are hard no’s for me. Of the remaining at-large candidates, who is the best choice and why?
Peter Gabor (Great Teacher!) : https://petergabor.org/
Full time HS teacher with FCPS since 2010, teaching Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics
Certificated in Math, Computer Science, Physics
Baccalaureate degrees from MIT in Electrical Engineering, Math, Computer Science
Masters degrees (EECS) and doctorate (CS) from Princeton
Also taught in NJ (Princeton HS), WA (Interlake HS), OR (St. Mary's Academy)
Have you met him?
What does he mean by this:
“ I believe FCPS should follow the rule of law, adhering to Federal, State, and Local statutes. I don't see how we can lead by example absent this.”
He has a doctorate in CS but his website looks like poo. Weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Dont just complain, get out and Vote:
School Board, At-Large (You can vote for up to 3 candidates)
Cassandra R. Aucoin
Maureen T. Brody
Saundra T. Davis
I plan to vote for Moon and Davis, both sensible moderates. McElveen and McDaniel are hard no’s for me. Of the remaining at-large candidates, who is the best choice and why?
Peter Gabor (Great Teacher!) : https://petergabor.org/
Full time HS teacher with FCPS since 2010, teaching Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics
Certificated in Math, Computer Science, Physics
Baccalaureate degrees from MIT in Electrical Engineering, Math, Computer Science
Masters degrees (EECS) and doctorate (CS) from Princeton
Also taught in NJ (Princeton HS), WA (Interlake HS), OR (St. Mary's Academy)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Dont just complain, get out and Vote:
School Board, At-Large (You can vote for up to 3 candidates)
Cassandra R. Aucoin
Maureen T. Brody
Saundra T. Davis
I plan to vote for Moon and Davis, both sensible moderates. McElveen and McDaniel are hard no’s for me. Of the remaining at-large candidates, who is the best choice and why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Dont just complain, get out and Vote:
School Board, At-Large (You can vote for up to 3 candidates)
Cassandra R. Aucoin
Maureen T. Brody
Saundra T. Davis
Are these RWNJs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how a race-blind process that picks 50% of the seats based on the top 1.5% at each school and 50% of the top kids' in general discriminates by race?
I don't see it and was hoping someone could make their case clearly.
People prefer to make these imaginary claims that they know can't be backed up with facts or reason.
And by "people", PP means Republicans spreading lies to garner votes.
Dont just complain, get out and Vote:
School Board, At-Large (You can vote for up to 3 candidates)
Cassandra R. Aucoin
Maureen T. Brody
Saundra T. Davis