Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Columbia is better, even with the recent locked campus/protests debacle/other negatives

If you're talking about recruiting in '25, Stern is considerably better than Columbia.

My personal feeling is that neither school is a healthy place for 18 year olds today. But at least the Columbia students have to read something to get through the Core. A very low bar.

Crime in NYC is about to skyrocket.

Can you please expand on that? DC is considering one of the NYC schools and I'm very concerned about this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Columbia is better, even with the recent locked campus/protests debacle/other negatives

If you're talking about recruiting in '25, Stern is considerably better than Columbia.

My personal feeling is that neither school is a healthy place for 18 year olds today. But at least the Columbia students have to read something to get through the Core. A very low bar.

Crime in NYC is about to skyrocket.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Columbia is better, even with the recent locked campus/protests debacle/other negatives

If you're talking about recruiting in '25, Stern is considerably better than Columbia.

My personal feeling is that neither school is a healthy place for 18 year olds today. But at least the Columbia students have to read something to get through the Core. A very low bar.

Anonymous wrote:Columbia any day. NYU is for rich kid Ivy rejects.

Anonymous wrote:This is so surprising to me. Back in the day, the elite ws firms preferred ivy to anyone else.

How did nyu pull this off? I am genuinely curious. Are they providing a more useful, relevant, or rigorous education? Do they provide better networking events? What have they done?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Columbia is better, even with the recent locked campus/protests debacle/other negatives

If you're talking about recruiting in '25, Stern is considerably better than Columbia.

My personal feeling is that neither school is a healthy place for 18 year olds today. But at least the Columbia students have to read something to get through the Core. A very low bar.

Agree that neither school is a healthy place for 18 year olds.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Columbia is better, even with the recent locked campus/protests debacle/other negatives

If you're talking about recruiting in '25, Stern is considerably better than Columbia.

My personal feeling is that neither school is a healthy place for 18 year olds today. But at least the Columbia students have to read something to get through the Core. A very low bar.

Anonymous wrote:Can't comment on stern/nyu, but i do have a recent Columbia college grad. With its small size and focus on liberal arts, I was surprised by the lack of student support - both for current students and career services. Just a tough place, competive and not much warmth. Teaching was mixed. Strong for classics but weak in several other areas. Grad students teaching core curriculum classes. Kid did fine (more because of their own intellect/initiative than the school).but we expected more for both the $ and perceived reputation.

Anonymous wrote:Love these nyu boosters because they're proud of their school (or kid's school). That's a great thing. However, writing that nyu undergrad is stronger than columbia college will just never be true. CC is staggeringly more competitive. It might feel good to write random sh*t on an anonymous forum, but it doesn't make it real. Grad schools are another matter, obviously.

Anonymous wrote:For finance and consulting recruiting, NYU wins. Columbia has that air of "the bottom Ivy." which never helps in recruiting. Career services are better at Stern too.