Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You generally can’t have a life partner if they are financially separate and at a very different wealth level than you. Mainly because if that’s true, your partner should spend all their time trying to build their personal financial base and for retirement, etc. It would be a mistake for them to spend their time being a SAHP or going on vacations or whatever else the richer partner might want to do with their time with their partner. Should they live in a house solely owned by their partner, or should they be building equity in whatever house they can afford on their own? Etc. You’re just going to struggle to run a family if you’re really running two separate families in different tax brackets. And it’s a recipe for resentment and bad power dynamics.
For the ultra wealthy, there’s so much middle ground for reasonable and generous prenups that allow everyone to proceed in good faith with a reasonable level of security. The media portrays it like it’s half or nothing but that’s not true.
Not true in every relationship. I was rich before meeting DW I never asked for a prenup, she has always had full access to the money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rich or wealthy?
Wealthy will have a prenup.
Rich needs someone to raise the kids.
If no kids desired, sure, don’t get married.
Not so fast. Even with a prenup, it can still be contested in court and you're at the mercy of the judicial system which is stacked against you.
The judicial system is stacked against the wealthy? Hahaha. The wealthy literally have killed people and got off scotch free. I don’t think you know how this country works.
I advise my UMC kids to steer clear of wealthy love interests.
Anonymous wrote:You generally can’t have a life partner if they are financially separate and at a very different wealth level than you. Mainly because if that’s true, your partner should spend all their time trying to build their personal financial base and for retirement, etc. It would be a mistake for them to spend their time being a SAHP or going on vacations or whatever else the richer partner might want to do with their time with their partner. Should they live in a house solely owned by their partner, or should they be building equity in whatever house they can afford on their own? Etc. You’re just going to struggle to run a family if you’re really running two separate families in different tax brackets. And it’s a recipe for resentment and bad power dynamics.
For the ultra wealthy, there’s so much middle ground for reasonable and generous prenups that allow everyone to proceed in good faith with a reasonable level of security. The media portrays it like it’s half or nothing but that’s not true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most rich men want the social standing that a high quality wife brings. This feels like a question only a man from a lower class/lower middle class background would ask.
I totally agree!
Anonymous wrote:The math just doesn’t seem to work. Why not just have kids with your girlfriend and never get married?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rich or wealthy?
Wealthy will have a prenup.
Rich needs someone to raise the kids.
If no kids desired, sure, don’t get married.
Not so fast. Even with a prenup, it can still be contested in court and you're at the mercy of the judicial system which is stacked against you.
Anonymous wrote:Rich or wealthy?
Wealthy will have a prenup.
Rich needs someone to raise the kids.
If no kids desired, sure, don’t get married.
Anonymous wrote:You generally can’t have a life partner if they are financially separate and at a very different wealth level than you. Mainly because if that’s true, your partner should spend all their time trying to build their personal financial base and for retirement, etc. It would be a mistake for them to spend their time being a SAHP or going on vacations or whatever else the richer partner might want to do with their time with their partner. Should they live in a house solely owned by their partner, or should they be building equity in whatever house they can afford on their own? Etc. You’re just going to struggle to run a family if you’re really running two separate families in different tax brackets. And it’s a recipe for resentment and bad power dynamics.
For the ultra wealthy, there’s so much middle ground for reasonable and generous prenups that allow everyone to proceed in good faith with a reasonable level of security. The media portrays it like it’s half or nothing but that’s not true.
Anonymous wrote:Most rich men want the social standing that a high quality wife brings. This feels like a question only a man from a lower class/lower middle class background would ask.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quality women will demand marriage.
This. You have to take a "discount" on the quality of wife. Elon, mentioned above, is a great example. His ex wife was prettier, smarter, and a better mother than his subsequent baby mamas.
Which one? He had several and he was into couple swapping with all of them. Men don't care about "quality" women, they want beautiful, great in bed, and someone who puts them on a pedestal.
Anonymous wrote:Wait, why is the OP about rich men only? Seems to me marriage would be even a worse deal for rich women, under OP’s hypothesis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quality women will demand marriage.
This. You have to take a "discount" on the quality of wife. Elon, mentioned above, is a great example. His ex wife was prettier, smarter, and a better mother than his subsequent baby mamas.