Anonymous wrote:I’m being invited to a destination wedding this summer in another continent and just traveling there will cost over $2000. This is out of control
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You should give 300
No, I *should* drink less, eat more vegetables, and stop swearing so much.
But there is no *should* when it comes to gifts. Gifts are entirely optional and 100% at the discretion of the giver.
I've been to many weddings -- from simple backyard affairs to four-day $500K extravaganzas. The amount spent on the event, the amount I spent to dress/get there has nothing to do with how much I give the couple. Our relationship is the only thing that matters.
And this thread just reminded me that the couple who hosted the four-day extravaganza still hasn't sent a thank you note. That factors into future gifts.
Did you send a thank you note for the extravaganza?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have never given only $100 to a wedding, and the first one I went to was in the mid 90’s. $100 would have seemed like an insult- I’d have been embarrassed to give that little.
You are seriously out of touch. I could not have afforded more than $100 back then, and even now it’s not nothing for my family. If you would judge a friend for the amount of a gift then good riddance. I hate to be unkind on here but posts like yours disgust me.
Anonymous wrote:The responses on these threads get tiresome, especially those calling others cheap or claiming you should cover the cost of your plate. The amount one gives should be based on the gifters budget and relationship. Obviously the area of the country and cultural norms also play a role. It’s tacky to invite people expecting a minimum amount. A gift isn’t an admission ticket. We received mostly $75-$100 gifts in the 90s. Our nephew is getting married soon and is from an affluent family so I don’t want to look cheap but DH’s travel expenses alone will be over $1000. We have 2 kids in college and lots of expenses so it’s a lot just for DH to attend so we probably will give $200. I hope we aren’t judged for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have never given only $100 to a wedding, and the first one I went to was in the mid 90’s. $100 would have seemed like an insult- I’d have been embarrassed to give that little.
Your privilege is showing.
What privilege? I rent, don’t own a car and earn five figures. But wedding are important and I save up and sacrifice other things for that.
Anonymous wrote:I have never given only $100 to a wedding, and the first one I went to was in the mid 90’s. $100 would have seemed like an insult- I’d have been embarrassed to give that little.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have never given only $100 to a wedding, and the first one I went to was in the mid 90’s. $100 would have seemed like an insult- I’d have been embarrassed to give that little.
Your privilege is showing.
Anonymous wrote:Good grief, what a bunch of cheap misers.
$50 for a wedding? No wonder why you don't get invited anywhere. That's like a bowl of chipotle these days.